Literature DB >> 25752567

Killing of Streptococcus pneumoniae by azithromycin, clarithromycin, erythromycin, telithromycin and gemifloxacin using drug minimum inhibitory concentrations and mutant prevention concentrations.

J M Blondeau1, S D Shebelski2, C K Hesje3.   

Abstract

Streptococcus pneumoniae continues to be a significant respiratory pathogen, and increasing antimicrobial resistance compromises the use of β-lactam and macrolide antibiotics. Bacterial eradication impacts clinical outcome, and bacterial loads at the site of infection may fluctuate. Killing of two macrolide- and quinolone-susceptible clinical S. pneumoniae isolates by azithromycin, clarithromycin, erythromycin, telithromycin and gemifloxacin against varying bacterial densities was determined using the measured minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) and mutant prevention concentration (MPC). For kill experiments, 10(6)-10(9) CFU/mL were exposed to the drug and were sampled at 0, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 12 and 24 h following drug exposure. The log(10) reduction and percent reduction (kill) of viable cells was recorded. MICs and MPCs (mg/L) for azithromycin, clarithromycin, erythromycin, telithromycin and gemifloxacin were 0.063-0.125/0.5-1, 0.031-0.063/0.25-0.5, 0.063/0.25-0.5, 0.008/0.016 and 0.031/0.25, respectively. Killing 10(6)-10(9) CFU/mL of bacteria by the drug MIC yielded incomplete killing, however log10 reductions occurred by 12 h and 24 h for all drugs. Exposure of 10(6)-10(9) CFU/mL to MPC drug concentrations resulted in the following log(10) reduction by 6h of drug exposure: azithromycin, 1.3-3.9; clarithromycin, 1.9-5.8; erythromycin, 0.8-4.7; telithromycin, 0.3-1.7; and gemifloxacin, 1.8-4.2. Bacterial loads at the site of infection may range from 10(6) to 10(9), and kill experiments utilising a higher bacterial inoculum provided a more accurate measure of antibiotic performance in high biomass situations. Killing was slower with telithromycin. Kill was greater and fastest with MPC versus MIC drug concentrations.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier B.V. and the International Society of Chemotherapy. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Killing activity; Macrolides; Mutant prevention concentration; Quinolones; Streptococcus pneumoniae

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25752567     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2014.12.034

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Antimicrob Agents        ISSN: 0924-8579            Impact factor:   5.283


  9 in total

Review 1.  Revisiting the mutant prevention concentration to guide dosing in childhood tuberculosis.

Authors:  Devan Jaganath; H Simon Schaaf; Peter R Donald
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  2017-07-01       Impact factor: 5.790

Review 2.  The Role of Macrolides in Chronic Rhinosinusitis (CRSsNP and CRSwNP).

Authors:  Gretchen M Oakley; Richard J Harvey; Valerie J Lund
Journal:  Curr Allergy Asthma Rep       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 4.806

Review 3.  Individualising Therapy to Minimize Bacterial Multidrug Resistance.

Authors:  A J Heffernan; F B Sime; J Lipman; J A Roberts
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 9.546

4.  Assessment of Long-Term Macrolide Exposure on the Oropharyngeal Microbiome and Macrolide Resistance in Healthy Adults and Consequences for Onward Transmission of Resistance.

Authors:  Jocelyn M Choo; Geraint B Rogers; Lucy D Burr; Steven L Taylor; Alyson Richard; Veronika Schreiber; Stevie Lingman; Megan Martin; Lito E Papanicolas
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2022-03-16       Impact factor: 5.938

5.  Determination of the Mutant Selection Window and Evaluation of the Killing of Mycoplasma gallisepticum by Danofloxacin, Doxycycline, Tilmicosin, Tylvalosin and Valnemulin.

Authors:  Nan Zhang; Xiaomei Ye; Yuzhi Wu; Zilong Huang; Xiaoyan Gu; Qinren Cai; Xiangguang Shen; Hongxia Jiang; Huanzhong Ding
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-01-04       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Clinical And Bacteriological Impact Of Clarithromycin In Streptococcal Pharyngitis: Findings From A Meta-Analysis Of Clinical Trials.

Authors:  Daryl J Hoban; Jos Nauta
Journal:  Drug Des Devel Ther       Date:  2019-10-16       Impact factor: 4.162

7.  In vitro killing of canine strains of Staphylococcus pseudintermedius and Escherichia coli by cefazolin, cefovecin, doxycycline and pradofloxacin over a range of bacterial densities.

Authors:  Joseph M Blondeau; Shantelle D Fitch
Journal:  Vet Dermatol       Date:  2020-02-06       Impact factor: 1.589

8.  Pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic modeling of tylosin against Streptococcus suis in pigs.

Authors:  Lingli Huang; Haiyang Zhang; Mei Li; Ijaz Ahmad; Yulian Wang; Zonghui Yuan
Journal:  BMC Vet Res       Date:  2018-10-24       Impact factor: 2.741

9.  Optimal regimens based on PK/PD cutoff evaluation of ceftiofur against Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae in swine.

Authors:  Da Sun; Kun Mi; Haihong Hao; Shuyu Xie; Dongmei Chen; Lingli Huang
Journal:  BMC Vet Res       Date:  2020-09-29       Impact factor: 2.741

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.