Literature DB >> 25752354

Policy commercializing nonprofits in health: the history of a paradox from the 19th century to the ACA.

Daniel M Fox1.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: POLICY POINTS: Health policy in the United States has, for more than a century, simultaneously and paradoxically incentivized the growth as well as the commercialization of nonprofit organizations in the health sector. This policy paradox persists during the implementation of the Affordable Care Act of 2010. CONTEXT: For more than a century, policy in the United States has incentivized both expansion in the number and size of tax-exempt nonprofit organizations in the health sector and their commercialization. The implementation of the Affordable Care Act of 2010 (ACA) began yet another chapter in the history of this policy paradox.
METHODS: This article explores the origin and persistence of the paradox using what many scholars call "interpretive social science." This methodology prioritizes history and contingency over formal theory and methods in order to present coherent and plausible narratives of events and explanations for them. These narratives are grounded in documents generated by participants in particular events, as well as conversations with them, observing them in action, and analysis of pertinent secondary sources. The methodology achieves validity and reliability by gathering information from multiple sources and making disciplined judgments about its coherence and correspondence with reality.
FINDINGS: A paradox with deep historical roots persists as a result of consensus about its value for both population health and the revenue of individuals and organizations in the health sector. Participants in this consensus include leaders of governance who have disagreed about many other issues. The paradox persists because of assumptions about the burden of disease and how to address it, as well as about the effects of biomedical science that is translated into professional education, practice, and the organization of services for the prevention, diagnosis, treatment, and management of illness.
CONCLUSIONS: The policy paradox that has incentivized the growth and commercialization of nonprofits in the health sector since the late 19th century remains influential in health policy, especially for the allocation of resources. However, aspects of the implementation of the ACA may constrain some of the effects of the paradox.
© 2015 Milbank Memorial Fund.

Entities:  

Keywords:  health financing; health policy; health providers; health services

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25752354      PMCID: PMC4364435          DOI: 10.1111/1468-0009.12109

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Milbank Q        ISSN: 0887-378X            Impact factor:   4.911


  21 in total

1.  Political evolution of federal health care regulation.

Authors:  L D Brown
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 6.301

2.  Sharing governmental authority: Blue Cross and hospital planning in New York City.

Authors:  D M Fox
Journal:  J Health Polit Policy Law       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 2.265

3.  Between public and private: a half century of Blue Cross and Blue Shield in New York.

Authors:  D M Fox; D Rosner; R A Stevens
Journal:  J Health Polit Policy Law       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 2.265

4.  Tax administration as health policy: hospitals, the Internal Revenue Service, and the courts.

Authors:  D M Fox; D C Schaffer
Journal:  J Health Polit Policy Law       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 2.265

5.  From piety to platitudes to pork: the changing politics of health workforce policy.

Authors:  D M Fox
Journal:  J Health Polit Policy Law       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 2.265

6.  Anticipating the magic moment: the public interest in health plan conversions in California.

Authors:  D M Fox; P Isenberg
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 6.301

7.  Health policy and ERISA: interest groups and semipreemption.

Authors:  D M Fox; D C Schaffer
Journal:  J Health Polit Policy Law       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 2.265

8.  From reform to relativism: a history of economists and health care.

Authors:  D M Fox
Journal:  Milbank Mem Fund Q Health Soc       Date:  1979

9.  The decline of historicism: the case of compulsory health insurance in the United States.

Authors:  D M Fox
Journal:  Bull Hist Med       Date:  1983       Impact factor: 1.314

Review 10.  Policy and epidemiology: financing health services for the chronically ill and disabled, 1930-1990.

Authors:  D M Fox
Journal:  Milbank Q       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 4.911

View more
  3 in total

1.  Fox Responds.

Authors:  Daniel M Fox
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  A Platform to Launch a Collective Discussion About Reforming US Health Politics and Policy.

Authors:  Daniel M Fox; Colleen M Grogan
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 9.308

3.  For-Profit Hospitals Have Thrived Because of Generous Public Reimbursement Schemes, Not Greater Efficiency: A Multi-Country Case Study.

Authors:  Patrick P T Jeurissen; Florien M Kruse; Reinhard Busse; David U Himmelstein; Elias Mossialos; Steffie Woolhandler
Journal:  Int J Health Serv       Date:  2020-10-27       Impact factor: 1.663

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.