Literature DB >> 25752201

Accuracy of loop-mediated isothermal amplification for the diagnosis of Clostridium difficile infection: a systematic review.

Aaron Lloyd1, Vinay Pasupuleti1, Priyaleela Thota1, Chaitanya Pant2, David D K Rolston3, Adrian V Hernandez4, Vicente A Benites-Zapata5, Thomas G Fraser6, Curtis J Donskey7, Abhishek Deshpande8.   

Abstract

Loop-mediated isothermal DNA amplification (LAMP) is currently used as standalone diagnostic test for C. difficile infection (CDI). We assessed the diagnostic accuracy of LAMP for the diagnosis of CDI. We searched 5 databases to identify studies that compared LAMP with culture cytotoxicity neutralization assay or anaerobic toxigenic culture (TC) of C. difficile. We used the random-effects model to calculate pooled sensitivities, specificities, diagnostic odds ratios, and their 95% confidence intervals (CIs). The search of the databases yielded 16 studies (6979 samples) that met inclusion criteria. When TC was used as the gold standard (6572 samples), bivariate analysis yielded a mean sensitivity of 0.95 (95% CI, 0.93-0.97; I(2)=67.4) and a mean specificity of 0.99 (95% CI, 0.96-1.00; I(2)=97.0). LAMP is a useful diagnostic tool with high sensitivity and specificity for detecting CDI. The results should, however, be interpreted only in the presence of clinical suspicion and symptoms of CDI.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  C. difficile; CDI; Diagnostic accuracy; LAMP; Sensitivity; Specificity

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25752201     DOI: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2015.02.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis        ISSN: 0732-8893            Impact factor:   2.803


  6 in total

1.  Performance Evaluation of the Novodiag Bacterial GE+ Multiplex PCR Assay.

Authors:  Charly Roy; David Robert; Lucie Bénéjat; Alice Buissonnière; Astrid Ducournau; Francis Mégraud; Emilie Bessède; Delphine Boraud; Philippe Lehours
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2020-09-22       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 2.  Host response to Clostridium difficile infection: Diagnostics and detection.

Authors:  Elena A Usacheva; Jian-P Jin; Lance R Peterson
Journal:  J Glob Antimicrob Resist       Date:  2016-09-20       Impact factor: 4.035

3.  A prospective study of two isothermal amplification assays compared with real-time PCR, CCNA and toxigenic culture for the diagnosis of Clostridium difficile infection.

Authors:  Martina Neuendorf; Raquel Guadarrama-Gonzalez; Birgit Lamik; Colin R MacKenzie
Journal:  BMC Microbiol       Date:  2016-02-12       Impact factor: 3.605

Review 4.  Current and Future Perspectives on Isothermal Nucleic Acid Amplification Technologies for Diagnosing Infections.

Authors:  Godwin Attah Obande; Kirnpal Kaur Banga Singh
Journal:  Infect Drug Resist       Date:  2020-02-12       Impact factor: 4.003

Review 5.  Loop mediated isothermal amplification: An innovative gene amplification technique for animal diseases.

Authors:  Pravas Ranjan Sahoo; Kamadev Sethy; Swagat Mohapatra; Debasis Panda
Journal:  Vet World       Date:  2016-05-11

6.  Accuracy of Xpert Clostridium difficile assay for the diagnosis of Clostridium difficile infection: A meta analysis.

Authors:  Yuanyuan Bai; Xiaorong Sun; Yan Jin; Yueling Wang; Juan Li
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-10-09       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.