| Literature DB >> 25751618 |
Miika Korhonen1, Antti Muuronen1, Otso Arponen1, Pirjo Mustonen2, Marja Hedman3, Pekka Jäkälä4, Ritva Vanninen1, Mikko Taina1.
Abstract
The left atrial appendage (LAA) is the typical origin for intracardiac thrombus formation. Whether LAA morphology is associated with increased stroke/TIA risk is controversial and, if it does, which morphological type most predisposes to thrombus formation. We assessed LAA morphology in stroke patients with cryptogenic or suspected cardiogenic etiology and in age- and gender-matched healthy controls. LAA morphology and volume were analyzed by cardiac computed tomography in 111 patients (74 males; mean age 60 ± 11 years) with acute ischemic stroke of cryptogenic or suspected cardiogenic etiology other than known atrial fibrillation (AF). A subgroup of 40 patients was compared to an age- and gender-matched control group of 40 healthy individuals (21 males in each; mean age 54 ± 9 years). LAA was classified into four morphology types (Cactus, ChickenWing, WindSock, CauliFlower) modified with a quantitative qualifier. The proportions of LAA morphology types in the main stroke group, matched stroke subgroup, and control group were as follows: Cactus (9.0%, 5.0%, 20.0%), ChickenWing (23.4%, 37.5%, 10.0%), WindSock (47.7%, 35.0%, 67.5%), and CauliFlower (19.8%, 22.5%, 2.5%). The distribution of morphology types differed significantly (P<0.001) between the matched stroke subgroup and control group. The proportion of single-lobed LAA was significantly higher (P<0.001) in the matched stroke subgroup (55%) than the control group (6%). LAA volumes were significantly larger (P<0.001) in both stroke study groups compared to controls patients. To conclude, LAA morphology differed significantly between stroke patients and controls, and single-lobed LAAs were overrepresented and LAA volume was larger in patients with acute ischemic stroke of cryptogenic or suspected cardiogenic etiology.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2015 PMID: 25751618 PMCID: PMC4353716 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0118822
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Fig 1LAA morphology types based on Wang’s classification with Kimura’s quantitative limits.
LAA length was measured from the orifice area (dashed orange line) to the farthest point of the LAA via the center of the main lobe. The bend angle was measured with an imaginary vertical line (red dashed line) and a line between the main lobe and the farthest point of the LAA. Cactus has a dominant central lobe, one or more secondary lobes, and total length less than 4 cm. ChickenWing has only one lobe, total length more than 4 cm, and a bend angle less than 100°. WindSock has one dominant lobe with several secondary, or even tertiary lobes, total length more than 4 cm, and a bend angle of over 100°. CauliFlower has a total length less than 4 cm and complex internal structures.
Clinical Characteristics of the Main Stroke Group (n = 111), the Matched Stroke Subgroup (n = 40) and Control Group (n = 40).
| Characteristic | Main stroke group | Matched stroke subgroup | Control group |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, years | 60.4 ± 11.2 | 53.9 ± 9.3 | 53.8 ± 9.0 | ns |
| Males | 74 (66.7) | 21 (52.5) | 21 (52.5) | ns |
| Body mass index, kg/m2 | 27.8 ± 4.4 | 28.7 ± 4.8 | 25.3 ± 4.1 | 0.002 |
| Body surface area, m2 | 2.0 ± 0.2 | 2.0 ± 0.2 | 1.8 ± 0.2 | 0.033 |
| Caucasian | 111 (100) | 40 (100.0) | 40 (100.0) | ns |
| Hypertension | 63 (56.8) | 16 (40.0) | 0 (0.0) | <0.001 |
| Dyslipidemia | 39 (35.1) | 14 (35.0) | 16 (40.0) | ns |
| Diabetes | 12 (10.8) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | ns |
| Smokers | 27 (24.3) | 9 (22.5) | 1 (2.5) | 0.003 |
| Left ventricle dysfunction, n (%) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | ns |
| AF or AFl on 24- hour ambulatory Holter ECG | 17 (15.3) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0) | ns |
| Left ventricle ejection fraction, % | 63.6 ± 10.4 | 66.0 ± 10.2 | 63.7 ± 7.7 | ns |
| Prior myocardial infarction | 10 (9.0) | 2 (5.0) | 0 (0.0) | ns |
| Prior stroke | 19 (17.1) | 5 (12.5) | 0 (0.0) | 0.021 |
| Left atrium volume on CT, mL | 95.3 ± 31.2 | 85.5 ± 21.1 | 59.8 ± 15.3 | <0.001 |
| Left atrium volume on CT adjusted for height, mL/m | 55.6 ± 17.6 | 50.5 ± 12.6 | 35.1 ± 8.0 | <0.001 |
| Left atrium volume on CT adjusted for BSA, mL/m2 | 48.7 ± 15.6 | 43.9 ± 10.9 | 32.2 ± 6.7 | <0.001 |
| Left atrial appendage volume on CT, mL | 12.6 ± 5.2 | 10.2 ± 3.3 | 6.2 ± 1.9 | <0.001 |
| Left atrial appendage volume on CT adjusted for height, mL/m | 7.4 ± 3.0 | 6.5 ± 2.2 | 3.7 ± 1.1 | <0.001 |
| Left atrial appendage volume on CT adjusted for BSA, mL/m2 | 6.5 ± 2.7 | 5.7 ± 2.0 | 3.4 ± 1.1 | <0.001 |
| LAA thrombus in TEE and CT | 6 (5.4) | 0 (0) | 0 (0.0) | ns |
| LAA peak flow velocity, cm/s | 0.65 ± 0.6 | 0.64 ± 0.4 | NA | |
| Patent foramen ovale | 11 (11.2) | 5 (13.2) | NA | |
| Prosthetic aortic or mitral valve | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | ns |
| Aortic stenosis | 1 (0.9) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | ns |
| Mitral stenosis | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | ns |
| Mild or moderate mitral regurgitation | 32 (35.6) | 9 (30.0) | NA | |
| Moderately severe or severe mitral regurgitation | 1 (1.1) | 0 (0) | NA |
Data are given as n (%) or mean ± SDAF = Atrial Fibrillation; AFl = Atrial Flutter; CT = Computed Tomography; ECG = Electrocardiography; NA = Not assessed; ns = not significant; TEE = Transesophageal echocardiogram
a Statistical significance between matched stroke subgroup and control group
b n = 109
c n = 37
d n = 79
e n = 31
f n = 98
g n = 38
h n = 90
i n = 30
Fig 2Prevalence of LAA morphologies among the three study groups.
Fig 3Prevalence of single-lobed LAA and multiple lobe (≥ 2) LAA in the three study groups.
Comparison of Morphology-related Variables in Specific Left Atrial Appendage (LAA) Morphology Types in the Main Stroke Group (n = 111).
| LAA morphology | n (%) | Age, years | LAA volume unadjusted, mL | LAA volume adjusted for height, mL/m | LAA volume adjusted for body surface area, mL/m2 | Enlarged LAA volume adjusted for body surface area |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean ± SD | Mean ± SD | Mean ± SD | Mean ± SD | n (% of total morphology type) | ||
| Cactus | 10 (9.0) | 62.6 ± 8.7 | 12.4 ± 5.7 | 7.2 ± 3.3 | 6.5 ± 3.2 | 6 (60) |
| ChickenWing | 26 (23.4) | 56.5 ± 12.0 | 13.9 ± 6.0 | 8.1 ± 3.3 | 7.1 ± 2.9 | 16 (62) |
| WindSock | 53 (47.7) | 61.9 ± 11.4 | 13.5 ± 4.8 | 7.9 ± 2.8 | 6.9 ± 2.5 | 41 (77) |
| CauliFlower | 22 (19.8) | 60.6 ± 10.3 | 9.0 ± 3.2 | 5.2 ± 1.9 | 4.6 ± 1.8 | 6 (27) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Mean ± SD | Mean ± SD | Mean ± SD | Mean ± SD | n (% of total morphology type) | ||
| Cactus | 10 (9.0) | 62.6 ± 8.7 | 12.4 ± 5.7 | 7.2 ± 3.3 | 6.5 ± 3.2 | 6 (60) |
| ChickenWing | 26 (23.4) | 56.5 ± 12.0 | 13.9 ± 6.0 | 8.1 ± 3.3 | 7.1 ± 2.9 | 16 (62) |
| WindSock | 53 (47.7) | 61.9 ± 11.4 | 13.5 ± 4.8 | 7.9 ± 2.8 | 6.9 ± 2.5 | 41 (77) |
| CauliFlower | 22 (19.8) | 60.6 ± 10.3 | 9.0 ± 3.2 | 5.2 ± 1.9 | 4.6 ± 1.8 | 6 (27) |
Note: Significance assessed using the Mann-Whitney U-test
a P<0.05
b P<0.001
SD = standard deviation
Left Atrial Appendage (LAA) Morphology and Increased Stroke Risk in the Literature.
| Group, year | Total N (Males, N [%]) | Mean age ± SD | Modality | Indication for imaging | Type of study | LAA classification (number of classes) | Stroke- associated LAA morphology | Other findings |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yamamoto et al, 2014 [ | 564 (457[81%]) | 61 ± 11 | TEE (3D) | AF ablation | Prospective | Complex vs. non-complex morphology (2) | Complex morphology | Increased number of LAA lobes independently associated with LAA thrombus formation |
| Kimura et al, 2013 [ | 80 (66[83%]) | 59 ± 6 | CT | AF ablation | Retrospective | Quantitative Wang’s model (4) | ChickenWing | CauliFlower dominant morphology (40%) |
| Khurram et al, 2013 [ | 678 (507[75%]) | 60 ± 10 | CT | AF ablation | Retrospective | Wang’s model (4) | Different morphologies not associated with stroke | ChickenWing dominant morphology (58%); short LAA length associated with stroke |
| Anselmino et al, 2013 [ | 348 (274[79%]) | 57 ± 11 | CT/MRI | AF ablation and SCI burden assessment | Retrospective | Wang’s model (4) | NA | CauliFlower and Windsock associated with the prevalence of SCI |
| Makino et al, 2013 [ | 103 (NA) | NA | TEE and cCT | AF | Retrospective | Wang’s model (4) | NA | ChickenWing morphology associated with elevated LAA flow velocity |
| Park et al, 2013 [ | 264 (212[80%]) | 55 ± 11 | 3D-CT and TEE | AF ablation | Retrospective | No classification, only quantitative LAA measurements | NA | Depressed systolic function of the LAA was significantly related to stroke/TIA and recurrence of AF after catheter ablation |
| Di Biase et al, 2012 [ | 932 (734[79%]) | 59 ± 10 | CT/MRI | AF ablation | Retrospective | Wang’s model (4) | Non-ChickenWing | ChickenWing dominant morphology (48%); Windsock more common in men |
| Koplay et al, 2012 [ | 320 (223[70%]) | 58 ± NA | MDCT | Various indications for CAD | Retrospective | Modified Lacomis’ model (5) | Different morphologies not associated with thrombus formation | Dominant morphology was type 2b (Fan) where LAA tip was short, not prominent and inferiorly oriented |
| Shi et al, 2012 [ | 75 (42[56%]) | 42 ± 12 | CTA | AF or ASD | Prospective | Shi’s model (8) | NA | Tube morphology with a single lobe was more common in AF patients than ASD patients |
| Walker et al, 2012 [ | 59 (43[73%]) | 60 ± 8 | CT | AF ablation | Prospective | No classification, only quantitative LAA measurements | NA | Strong correlation between increased LAA volume and LA volume; LAA orifice dimensions were significantly larger in persistent AF than PAF |
a According to LAA quantitative measurements: Cactus, ChickenWing, CauliFlower, WindSock
b According to LAA external appearance: Cactus, ChickenWing, CauliFlower, WindSock
c According to LAA tip orientation and external appearance: Horseshoe, Hand-finger, Fan, Wing, Hook, Wedge, Swan
d According to LAA external appearance: Tube, Claw, Sphere-like, Tadpole, Willow-leaf, Sword, Duckbill, Irregular
AF = atrial fibrillation; ASD = atrial septal defect; CAD = coronary artery disease; cCT = cardiac CT; CT = computed tomography; CTA = CT angiography; LAA = left atrial appendage; MDCT = multidetector CT; MRI = magnetic resonance imaging; NA = not applicable; PAF = paroxysmal AF; SCI = silent cerebral ischemia; SD = standard deviation; TEE = transesophageal echocardiogram