BACKGROUND: The use of invasive coronary angiography in stable ischemic heart disease (IHD) varies widely. OBJECTIVE: To validate the 2012 appropriate use criteria for diagnostic catheterization by examining the relationship between the appropriateness of cardiac catheterization in patients with suspected stable IHD and the proportion of patients with obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD) and subsequent revascularization. DESIGN: Population-based, observational, multicenter cohort study. SETTING: The Cardiac Care Network, a registry of all patients having elective angiography at 18 hospitals in Ontario, Canada, between 1 October 2008 and 30 September 2011. PATIENTS: Persons without prior coronary revascularization or myocardial infarction who had angiography for suspected stable CAD. MEASUREMENTS: Appropriateness scores were ascertained by using data collected at the time of the index angiography and were categorized as appropriate, inappropriate, or uncertain. RESULTS: Among the final cohort of 48 336 patients, 58.2% of angiographic studies were classified as appropriate, 10.8% were classified as inappropriate, and 31.0% were classified as uncertain. Overall, 45.5% of patients had obstructive CAD. In patients with appropriate indications for angiography, 52.9% had obstructive CAD, with 40.0% undergoing revascularization. In those with inappropriate indications, 30.9% had obstructive CAD and 18.9% underwent revascularization; in those with uncertain indications, 36.7% had obstructive CAD and 25.9% had revascularization. Although more patients with appropriate indications had obstructive CAD and underwent revascularization (P < 0.001), a substantial proportion of those with inappropriate or uncertain indications had important coronary disease. LIMITATION: Data were not available on whether symptoms were atypical. CONCLUSION: Despite the association between appropriateness category and obstructive CAD, this study raises concerns about the ability of the appropriate use criteria to guide clinical decision making. PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE: Canadian Institutes of Health Research.
BACKGROUND: The use of invasive coronary angiography in stable ischemic heart disease (IHD) varies widely. OBJECTIVE: To validate the 2012 appropriate use criteria for diagnostic catheterization by examining the relationship between the appropriateness of cardiac catheterization in patients with suspected stable IHD and the proportion of patients with obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD) and subsequent revascularization. DESIGN: Population-based, observational, multicenter cohort study. SETTING: The Cardiac Care Network, a registry of all patients having elective angiography at 18 hospitals in Ontario, Canada, between 1 October 2008 and 30 September 2011. PATIENTS: Persons without prior coronary revascularization or myocardial infarction who had angiography for suspected stable CAD. MEASUREMENTS: Appropriateness scores were ascertained by using data collected at the time of the index angiography and were categorized as appropriate, inappropriate, or uncertain. RESULTS: Among the final cohort of 48 336 patients, 58.2% of angiographic studies were classified as appropriate, 10.8% were classified as inappropriate, and 31.0% were classified as uncertain. Overall, 45.5% of patients had obstructive CAD. In patients with appropriate indications for angiography, 52.9% had obstructive CAD, with 40.0% undergoing revascularization. In those with inappropriate indications, 30.9% had obstructive CAD and 18.9% underwent revascularization; in those with uncertain indications, 36.7% had obstructive CAD and 25.9% had revascularization. Although more patients with appropriate indications had obstructive CAD and underwent revascularization (P < 0.001), a substantial proportion of those with inappropriate or uncertain indications had important coronary disease. LIMITATION: Data were not available on whether symptoms were atypical. CONCLUSION: Despite the association between appropriateness category and obstructive CAD, this study raises concerns about the ability of the appropriate use criteria to guide clinical decision making. PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE: Canadian Institutes of Health Research.
Authors: Jarrod E Dalton; David A Zidar; Belinda L Udeh; Manesh R Patel; Jesse D Schold; Neal V Dawson Journal: Med Care Date: 2016-06 Impact factor: 2.983
Authors: Luis Sérgio Carvalho Luciano; Roberto Léo da Silva; Ozir Miguel Londero Filho; Leandro Waldrich; Luciano Panata; Ana Paula Trombetta; Julio Cesar Preve; Tammuz Fattah; Luiz Carlos Giuliano; Luiz Eduardo Koenig São Thiago Journal: Arq Bras Cardiol Date: 2019-03-14 Impact factor: 2.000
Authors: Andrew Remfry; Howard Abrams; David M Dudzinski; Rory B Weiner; R Sacha Bhatia Journal: Cardiovasc Ultrasound Date: 2015-11-14 Impact factor: 2.062
Authors: Idan Roifman; Harindra C Wijeysundera; Peter C Austin; Mohammad R Rezai; Graham A Wright; Jack V Tu Journal: J Am Heart Assoc Date: 2017-07-19 Impact factor: 5.501