Literature DB >> 25751468

Surgical management of odontoid fractures at level one trauma center: a single-center series of 142 cases.

Dattaraj Paramanand Sawarkar, Pankaj Kumar Singh1, Saquib Azad Siddique, Deepak Agrawal, Guru Dutta Satyarthee, Deepak Kumar Gupta, Sumit Sinha, Shashank S Kale, Bhawani Shanker Sharma.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Odontoid fractures constitute 9-20% of all adult cervical spine fractures. The present study was carried out to focus on the nuances involved in the surgical management of odontoid fractures.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with an odontoid fracture, admitted for surgical stabilization, between January 2008 and March 2014, were included in the study.
RESULTS: Among 142 patients [127 male and 15 female patients; median age: 28 years range 4-75 years], type II odontoid fractures were present in 111, type IIA fractures in 8, and type III fractures in 23 patients. 58.5% patients had been involved in a motor vehicular accident while 38.7% had sustained a fall. Eighty-five patients (59.9%) with a well-reduced fracture and an intact transverse ligament underwent anterior odontoid screw (OS) placement; the other 57 patients (40.1%) underwent posterior fixation (PF). The mean follow-up duration was 22 months (range: 6 months-5.4 years). OS placement was successful in 82 patients (96.5%) with a fusion rate of 95% (95.8% in type II, 100% in type III, and 75% in type IIA odontoid fractures). The procedure-related morbidity was 11.7%. One patient died of sub-arachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) that occurred during OS placement. The PF procedures had a better fusion rate (96.5%). The latter patients, however, had significant restriction of their neck movements and an overall morbidity of 8.7%. The revision surgery rates after OS placement and PF fixation were 7% and 3.5%, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: Anterior OS fixation shows excellent fusion rates and should be the first-line management in reduced/non-displaced acute type II (including type IIA) and high type III odontoid fractures as it preserves cervical motion. PF, that has also been associated with an excellent fusion rate, should be reserved for patients where OS fixation has either failed or has not been feasible.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25751468     DOI: 10.4103/0028-3886.152633

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurol India        ISSN: 0028-3886            Impact factor:   2.117


  5 in total

1.  Fractures of C2 (Axis) Vertebra: Clinical Presentation and Management.

Authors:  Ahmed Bakhsh; Ahmed Alzahrani; Ali Hassan Aljuzair; Umair Ahmed; Hany Eldawoody
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2020-12-29

Review 2.  The impact of odontoid screw fixation techniques on screw-related complications and fusion rates: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Ivan Lvov; Andrey Grin; Aleksandr Talypov; Ivan Godkov; Anton Kordonskiy; Ulugbek Khushnazarov; Vladimir Smirnov; Vladimir Krylov
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2020-06-15       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Neurological recovery after surgical intervention of a complete spinal cord injury secondary to a chronic untreated odontoid neck fracture: a lesson in patient prognostication.

Authors:  Patricio Iii Espinoza Dumlao; Samuel Grozman
Journal:  BMJ Case Rep       Date:  2020-01-13

4.  A new tool in percutaneous anterior odontoid screw fixation.

Authors:  Yan Wang; Min Li; Guanxing Cui; Jing Li; Zhiliang Guo; Dahai Zhang; Haijun Teng; Haijiang Lu
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2021-01-18       Impact factor: 2.362

5.  Endoscopic Anterior Odontoid Screw Fixation for the Odontoid Fracture: A Cadaveric Pilot Study.

Authors:  Shweta Kedia; Dattaraj Sawarkar; Rajeev Sharma; Nasim Mansoori; Sanjeevv Lalwani; Deepak Gupta; Rajinder Kumar; Shashank Sharad Kale
Journal:  Asian J Neurosurg       Date:  2021-03-20
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.