| Literature DB >> 25750860 |
Pratik Satya1, Maya Karan1, Sourav Jana1, Sabyasachi Mitra1, Amit Sharma1, P G Karmakar1, D P Ray2.
Abstract
Twenty-four start codon targeted (SCoT) markers were used to assess genetic diversity and population structure of indigenous, introduced and domesticated ramie (Boehmeria nivea L. Gaudich.). A total of 155 genotypes from five populations were investigated for SCoT polymorphism, which produced 136 amplicons with 87.5% polymorphism. Polymorphism information content and resolving power of the SCoT markers were 0.69 and 3.22, respectively. The Indian ramie populations exhibited high SCoT polymorphism (> 50%), high genetic differentiation (GST = 0.27) and moderate gene flow (Nm = 1.34). Analysis of molecular variance identified significant differences for genetic polymorphism among the populations explaining 13.1% of the total variation. The domesticated population exhibited higher genetic polymorphism and heterozygosity compared to natural populations. Cluster analysis supported population genetic analysis and suggested close association between introduced and domesticated genotypes. The present study shows effectiveness of employing SCoT markers in a cross pollinated heterozygous species like Boehmeria, and would be useful for further studies in population genetics, conservation genetics and cultivar improvement.Entities:
Keywords: AMOVA; Boehmeria nivea; Genetic diversity; India; Population structure; Ramie; SCoT
Year: 2015 PMID: 25750860 PMCID: PMC4349193 DOI: 10.1016/j.mgene.2015.01.003
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Meta Gene ISSN: 2214-5400
Fig. 1A representative outline of geographical distribution of Indian ramie genotypes sampled for the present study. The arrows indicate direction of gene flow among populations.
Genetic polymorphism generated by 20 SCoT markers in ramie.
| Sl no. | Primer name | Primer sequence (5′–3′) | NTB | NPB | PIC | Rp | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. | S1 | CAACAATGGCTACCACCA | 5 | 3 | 0.50 | 2.84 | 0.57 |
| 2. | S2 | CAACAATGGCTACCACCC | 8 | 6 | 0.69 | 3.75 | 0.47 |
| 3. | S3 | CAACAATGGCTACCACCG | 5 | 4 | 0.82 | 2.38 | 0.58 |
| 4. | S6 | CAACAATGGTCACCACGC | 5 | 5 | 0.93 | 1.97 | 0.39 |
| 5. | S7 | CAACAATGGTCACCACGG | 10 | 5 | 0.46 | 3.81 | 0.38 |
| 6. | S11 | AAGCAATGGCTACCACCA | 5 | 3 | 0.63 | 2.80 | 0.56 |
| 7. | S12 | ACGACATGGCGACCAACG | 5 | 1 | 0.25 | 1.43 | 0.29 |
| 8. | S13 | ACGACATGGCGACCATCG | 10 | 8 | 0.71 | 5.00 | 0.50 |
| 9. | S14 | ACGACATGGCGACCACGC | 7 | 5 | 0.70 | 3.68 | 0.61 |
| 10. | S15 | ACGACATGGCGACCGCGA | 6 | 6 | 0.84 | 3.97 | 0.66 |
| 11. | S16 | ACCATGGCTACCACCGAC | 6 | 5 | 0.85 | 3.79 | 0.75 |
| 12. | S17 | ACCATGGCTACCACCGAG | 4 | 3 | 0.58 | 1.85 | 0.46 |
| 13. | S18 | ACCATGGCTACCACCGCC | 10 | 9 | 0.75 | 4.75 | 0.47 |
| 14. | S19 | ACCATGGCTACCACCGGC | 4 | 4 | 0.89 | 1.24 | 0.31 |
| 15. | S21 | ACGACATGGCGACCCACA | 9 | 6 | 0.59 | 3.64 | 0.45 |
| 16. | S22 | AACCATGGCTACCACCAC | 10 | 7 | 0.70 | 4.81 | 0.48 |
| 17. | S26 | ACCATGGCTACCACCGTC | 4 | 3 | 0.76 | 1.85 | 0.62 |
| 18. | S28 | CCATGGCTACCACCGCCA | 8 | 7 | 0.69 | 4.18 | 0.52 |
| 19. | S29 | CCATGGCTACCACCGGCC | 6 | 4 | 0.64 | 2.29 | 0.38 |
| 20. | S31 | CCATGGCTACCACCGCCT | 9 | 8 | 0.78 | 4.29 | 0.54 |
NTB, total number of bands amplified; NPB, number of polymorphic bands; PP, polymorphism (%), Rp, resolving power; , mean resolving power; J, Jaccard's similarity coefficient.
Genetic diversity parameters for the ramie populations under study.
| Population/group | Sample size | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lower Assam | 24 | 1.12 ± 0.07 | 1.22 ± 0.03 | 0.21 ± 0.02 | 0.14 ± 0.01 | 40.8 | ||||
| Upper Assam | 36 | 1.42 ± 0.07 | 1.35 ± 0.04 | 0.29 ± 0.03 | 0.21 ± 0.04 | 52.3 | ||||
| Meghalaya | 22 | 1.27 ± 0.07 | 1.30 ± 0.03 | 0.28 ± 0.02 | 0.18 ± 0.02 | 58.5 | ||||
| Introduced | 17 | 1.84 ± 0.04 | 1.46 ± 0.03 | 0.43 ± 0.02 | 0.28 ± 0.01 | 88.5 | ||||
| Domesticated population | 56 | 1.94 ± 0.03 | 1.44 ± 0.03 | 0.42 ± 0.01 | 0.27 ± 0.01 | 95.4 | ||||
| Total | 155 | 1.52 ± 0.03 | 1.35 ± 0.01 | 0.32 ± 0.01 | 0.21 ± 0.01 | 59.87 ± 9.04 | 0.36 | 0.18 | 0.52 | 0.46 |
Nei's unbiased genetic distance among the natural and breeding populations of ramie.
| Upper Assam | Lower Assam | Meghalaya | Domesticated population | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | 0.205 | 0.236 | 0.195 | 0.047 |
| Upper Assam | 0.076 | 0.099 | 0.266 | |
| Lower Assam | 0.077 | 0.289 | ||
| Meghalaya | 0.248 |
Variability in ramie populations under study revealed by AMOVA.
| Source | df | Mean square | Estimated variation | Variation (%) | P value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Among populations | 4 | 103.80 | 3.32 | 13.1 | 0.18 | < 0.001 |
| Among groups | 2 | 424.80 | 6.76 | 26.6 | 0.27 | < 0.001 |
| Within populations | 148 | 16.35 | 15.33 | 60.3 | 0.40 | < 0.001 |
Fig. 2Dendrogram showing relationship of B. nivea populations based on Jaccard's similarity coefficient. Bootstrap values are indicated at each node.