| Literature DB >> 25750718 |
Lauren A MacDonald1, Nicole Farquharson2, Gillian Merritt1, Sam Fooks1, Andrew S Medeiros3, Roland I Hall1, Brent B Wolfe2, Merrin L Macrae4, Jon N Sweetman5.
Abstract
Shallow lakes are dominant features in subarctic and Arctic landscapes and are responsive to multiple stressors, which can lead to rapid changes in limnological regimes with consequences for aquatic resources. We address this theme in the coastal tundra region of Wapusk National Park, western Hudson Bay Lowlands (Canada), where climate has warmed during the past century and theEntities:
Keywords: Carbon isotopes; Hudson Bay Lowlands; Lesser Snow Goose; climate warming; diatoms; limnology; nitrogen isotopes; paleolimnology; pigments; tundra pond
Year: 2015 PMID: 25750718 PMCID: PMC4338974 DOI: 10.1002/ece3.1354
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Ecol Evol ISSN: 2045-7758 Impact factor: 2.912
Figure 1Location of Wapusk National Park (Manitoba, Canada) and the three study ponds (WAP 20, WAP 21, and WAP 12). WAP 20 and WAP 21 are situated in an area of high disturbance by LSG since ∽1979, whereas WAP 12 is located outside of this area as of 2008. Gray regions depict the geographic limits of the LSG distribution at four time periods (based on data provided by Parks Canada in 2010).
Figure 2Photographs (A), (B), and (C) depict LSG disturbance in and adjacent to ponds WAP 20 and WAP 21. Photograph (D) is from WAP 12 and depicts a pond with low disturbance from the LSG population. Graph in panel (E) is an estimate of LSG population rise (Abraham et al. 2005ab; pg. 843). The solid line is a 3-year running average.
Analytical strategy for the sediment cores
| Analysis | WAP 20 | WAP 21 | WAP 12 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Loss on ignition | Core 2, core 3, and core 5 | Core 1 | Core 1 and core 2 |
| Every 0.5-cm interval | Every 0.5-cm interval | Every 0.5-cm interval | |
| Chronology | Core 3 | Core 1 | Core 2 |
| Every fourth 0.5-cm interval | Every second 0.5-cm interval | Every second 0.5-cm interval | |
| Geochemistry | Core 3 | Core 1 | Core 1 |
| Every second 0.5-cm interval | 0–19 cm: every second 0.5-cm interval | Every 0.5-cm interval | |
| 19–bottom: every 0.5-cm interval | |||
| Diatoms | Core 3 | Core 1 | Core 1 |
| Every second 0.5-cm interval | Every second 0.5-cm interval | Every second 0.5-cm interval | |
| Pigments | Core 2 | Core 1 | Core 1 |
| Every second 0.5-cm interval | Every second 0.5-cm interval | Every second 0.5-cm interval |
Figure 3Left panels present scatterplots showing activity profiles for the radioisotopes and depth–age profiles for (A) WAP 20, (B) WAP 21, and (C) WAP 12 sediment cores. Right panels present sedimentation rates. Error bars represent standard deviations.
Figure 6Stratigraphic profiles of selected paleolimnological variables for WAP 12. The vertical axis presents the age of the sediment core, as estimated from the 210Pb analysis. The average fitted breakpoint date of physical and geochemical variables is shown by a dashed line with the relative error indicated with a gray bar. The breakpoints were also applied to diatom and pigment profiles.
Figure 4Stratigraphic profiles of selected paleolimnological variables for WAP 20. The vertical axis presents the age of the sediment core, as estimated from the 210Pb analysis. The average fitted breakpoint date of physical and geochemical variables is shown by a dashed line with the relative error indicated with a gray bar. The breakpoints were also applied to diatom and pigment profiles.
Figure 5Stratigraphic profiles of selected paleolimnological variables for WAP 21. The vertical axis presents the age of the sediment core, as estimated from the 210Pb analysis. The average fitted breakpoint date of physical and geochemical variables is shown by a dashed line with the relative error indicated with a gray bar. The breakpoints were also applied to diatom and pigment profiles.
Figure 7Line plots depicting average seasonal values for selected limnological parameters of ponds WAP 20, WAP 21, and WAP 12 based on findings of MacDonald et al. (2014). Values represent the average of samples collected in early-June 2010–2012, late July 2010–2012, and mid-September 2010–2012. Values for WAP 12 July do not include July 2010 as the pond desiccated, and thus, samples could not be collected.
Figure 8Depiction of the evolution of pond limnology, nutrient behavior, and aquatic community in response to the different drivers of change. The solid horizontal line represents the limnological regime shift that all ponds experienced in response to climate warming, and the dashed horizontal line represents the limnological regime shift that only the LSG-disturbed ponds (WAP 20 and WAP 21) experienced.
The most sensitive limnological and paleolimnological parameters for identifying regime shifts from climate warming and LSG population expansion based on this study
| Stressor | Paleolimnology | Limnology | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Parameter | Interpretation | Parameter | Interpretation | |
| Climate Warming | Organic matter content | • Increase reflects increasing productivity | n/a | n/a |
| Diatoms | • Switch in dominance from episammic to benthic mat-dwelling taxa (e.g., Fragilaria pinnata to Denticula kuetzingii) indicates habitat shift | |||
| Pigments | • Appearance of cyanobacteria pigments (e.g., aphanizophyll) suggests N-limited conditions | |||
| Lesser Snow Goose Expansion | • Increase from 0‰ suggests increased N availability and increased productivity | • Mid-summer decline suggests chemically-enhanced CO2 invasion due to high productivity and high C demand | ||
| Pigments | • Decrease in cyanobacteria pigment abundance suggests increased N supply | ΔΔ13 | • Decrease in values to below 20‰ suggest high C demand | |
| • Decrease suggests chemically-enhanced CO2 invasion due to high productivity and high C demand | Conductivity | • High values due to erosional input of dissolved ions | ||