| Literature DB >> 25750716 |
Erika de la Peña-Cuéllar1, Julieta Benítez-Malvido1, Luis Daniel Avila-Cabadilla2, Miguel Martínez-Ramos1, Alejandro Estrada3.
Abstract
Tropical forests around the world have been lost, mainly because of agricultural activities. Linear elements like riparian vegetation in fragmented tropical landscapes help maintain the native flora and fauna. Information about the role of riparian corridors as a reservoir of bat species, however, is scanty. We assessed the value of riparian corridors on the conservation of phyllostomid bat assemblage in an agricultural landscape of southern Mexico. For 2 years (2011-2013), mist-netting at ground level was carried out twice during the dry season (December to May) and twice during the wet season (June to November) in different habitats: (1) riparian corridors in mature forest, (2) riparian corridors in pasture, (3) continuous forest away from riparian vegetation, and (4) open pastures. Each habitat was replicated three times. To determine the influence of vegetation structure on bat assemblages, all trees (≥10 cm dbh) were sampled in all habitats. Overall, 1752 individuals belonging to 28 species of Phyllostomidae were captured with Sternodermatinae being the most rich and abundant subfamily. Riparian corridors in mature forest and pastures had the greatest species richness and shared 65% of all species. Open pastures had the lowest richness and abundance of bats with no Phyllostominae species recorded. Six of the 18 species recorded could be considered as habitat indicators. There was a positive relationship between bat species composition and tree basal area. Our findings suggest that contrary to our expectations, bats with generalist habits and naturally abundant could be useful detector taxa of habitat modification, rather than bats strongly associated with undisturbed forest. Also in human-dominated landscapes, the maintenance of habitat elements such as large trees in riparian corridors can serve as reservoirs for bat species, especially for those that are strongly associated with undisturbed forest.Entities:
Keywords: Agricultural matrix; corridors; diversity; frugivores; indicator taxa
Year: 2015 PMID: 25750716 PMCID: PMC4338972 DOI: 10.1002/ece3.1375
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Ecol Evol ISSN: 2045-7758 Impact factor: 2.912
Figure 1Study area and bat sampling sites at the Lacandona forest, Chiapas, Mexico.
Number of bats captured by species in different habitat types at Lacandona, Chiapas, Mexico. Bat guilds are as follows: F, frugivores; GI, gleaning insectivores; N, nectarivores; C, carnivores; and S, sanguivores
| FAMILY Subfamily | Guild | Habitats | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Riparian mature (RM) | Riparian pasture (RP) | Mature forest (MF) | Pasture (P) | Total | ||
| PHYLLOSTOMIDAE | ||||||
| Carolliinae | ||||||
| | F | 20 (1.11) | 34 (1.8) | 5 (0.31) | 1 (0.05) | 60 |
| | F | 9 (0.5) | 6 (0.33) | 8 (0.5) | 2 (0.11) | 25 |
| Desmodontinae | ||||||
| | S | 1 (0.05) | 8 (0.44) | 1 (0.06) | 4 (0.22) | 14 |
| | S | 0 | 1 (0.05) | 1 (0.06) | 0 | 2 |
| Glossophaginae | ||||||
| | N | 2 (0.11) | 0 | 1 (0.06) | 0 | 3 |
| | N | 6 (0.33) | 80 (4.44) | 2 (0.12) | 20 (1.11) | 108 |
| | N | 0 | 0 | 4 (0.25) | 0 | 4 |
| | N | 1 (0.07) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Phyllostominae | ||||||
| | GI | 1 (0.05) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| | GI | 2 (0.11) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| | GI | 0 | 7 (0.38) | 0 | 0 | 7 |
| | GI | 0 | 1 (0.05) | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| | C | 2 (0.11) | 0 | 1 (0.06) | 0 | 3 |
| | GI | 3 (0.16) | 2 (0.11) | 3 (0.18) | 0 | 8 |
| Stenodermatinae | ||||||
| | F | 72 (4) | 59 (3.27) | 41 (2.56) | 29 (1.61) | 201 |
| | F | 113 (6.27) | 190 (10.55) | 25 (1.56) | 74 (4.11) | 402 |
| | F | 8 (0.44) | 11 (0.61) | 0 | 6 (0.33) | 25 |
| | F | 1 (0.05) | 0 | 2 (0.12) | 0 | 3 |
| | F | 3 (0.16) | 8 (0.44) | 4 (0.25) | 1 (0.05) | 16 |
| | F | 1 (0.05) | 1 (0.05) | 2 (0.12) | 1 (0.05) | 5 |
| | F | 2 (0.11) | 3 (0.16) | 2 (0.12) | 1 (0.05) | 8 |
| | F | 0 | 3 (0.16) | 1 (0.06) | 0 | 4 |
| | F | 24 (1.33) | 47 (2.61) | 2 (0.12) | 9 (0.5) | 82 |
| | F | 68 (3.77) | 315 (17.5) | 27 (1.68) | 119 (6.61) | 529 |
| | F | 1 (0.05) | 1 (0.05) | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| | F | 48 (2.66) | 92 (5.11) | 0 | 29 (1.61) | 169 |
| | F | 7 (0.38) | 5 (0.27) | 1 (0.06) | 3 (0.16) | 16 |
| | F | 39 (2.16) | 11 (0.611) | 1 (0.06) | 0 | 51 |
| Total abundance | 434 | 885 | 134 | 299 | 1752 | |
| Samples | 18 | 18 | 16 | 18 | 70 | |
| Richness | 23 | 21 | 20 | 14 | 28 | |
| Completeness(%) | 87 | 92 | 92 | 89 | ||
Parentheses indicate the relative abundance (bats captured per night sampling) from 18 nights of sampling for RM, RP, and P, and 16 nights of sampling for MF.
Feeding strategy based on Soriano (2000); =Nomadic and =Sedentary.
1Based on the average of the following indices: ICE, Chao2 and Bootstrap.
Figure 2Individual-based rarefaction curves of bat species within different habitat types at the Lacandona forest. Dotted lines delineate 95% of confidence intervals.
Figure 3Rank-abundance (dominance-diversity) curves of bat species at Lacandona forest. Numbers represent the species captured. 1: Artibeus jamaicensis, 2: A. lituratus, 3: A. phaeotis, 4: A. toltecus, 5: A. watsoni, 6: Carollia perspicillata, 7: C. sowelli, 8: Centurio senex, 9: Chiroderma salvini, 10: C. villosum, 11: Choeroniscus godmani, 12: Desmodus rotundus, 13: Diphylla ecaudata, 14: Glossophaga soricina, 15: Hylonicteris underwoodi, 16: Lampronycteris brachyotis, 17: Lichonycteris obscura, 18: Lonchorhina aurita, 19: Mimon crenulatum, 20: Phyllostomus discolor, 21: Platyrrhinus helleri, 22: Sturnira lilium, 23: S. ludovici, 24: Tonatia saurophila, 25: Trachops cirrhosus, 26: Uroderma bilobatum, 27: Vampyressa thyone, and 28: Vampyrodes caraccioli.
Figure 4NMDS ordination based on species composition and bat abundance data at the Lacandona forest, where RM, riparian mature; RP, riparian pasture; MF, mature forest; P, open pasture.
Bat taxa with a significant indicator value (IV) in the Lacandona, Chiapas, Mexico
| Taxonomic level | Taxon | Habitat | IV | Category | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Subfamily | Glossophaginae | RP | 0.682 | I | |
| Stenodermatinae | RP | 0.500 | I | ||
| Desmodontinae | RP | 0.548 | 0.271 | D | |
| Genus | Glossophaga | MF | 0.739 | I | |
| Lonchorhina | RM | 0.666 | 0.192 | D | |
| Mimon | RP | 0.666 | 0.170 | D | |
| Platyrrhinus | RP | 0.573 | 0.321 | D | |
| Sturnira | RP | 0.593 | I | ||
| Uroderma | RP | 0.544 | 0.087 | D | |
| Vampyrodes | RM | 0.761 | 0.212 | D | |
| Species | RP | 0.559 | 0.215 | D | |
| RP | 0.739 | I | |||
| RM | 0.666 | 0.186 | D | ||
| RP | 0.666 | 0.183 | D | ||
| RP | 0.573 | 0.337 | D | ||
| RP | 0.593 | I | |||
| RP | 0.544 | 0.089 | D | ||
| RM | 0.761 | 0.222 | D |
RM, riparian mature; RP, riparian pasture; MF, mature forest; P, open pasture; D, detector taxon; I, indicator taxon.
Significant P-values (<0.05) appear in bold.
Confidence set of plausible models (95%) explaining the variation in response variables
| Response variable | Model |
| logLik | AIC | Δ |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Night data analyses | ||||||
| Abundance | Season | 3 | 450.82 | 910.64 | 0.00 | 0.81 |
| Habitat + Season | 6 | 442.39 | 913.58 | 2.93 | 0.19 | |
| Habitat | 5 | 500.12 | 1020.24 | 109.59 | 0.00 | |
| Site data analyses | ||||||
| Species composition | Habitat | 5 | 2.12 | 15.75 | 0.00 | 0.56 |
| 3 | 4.35 | 17.70 | 1.94 | 0.21 | ||
K, number of estimated parameters; logLik, log-likelihood; AIC, sample-sized adjusted Akaike information criterion; Δ, Akaike differences; and w, Akaike weights. Response variables: species abundances, species rarified at lowest number of captures, species composition, and guild composition. Explanatory variables are the following: habitat, Vspcomp, using scores of NMDS axis 1; Vheight, average height of trees at each site; Vbasal area, total basal area at each site; Vabundance, total number of trees; Vrich, number or species.