Literature DB >> 25750415

Vision in avian emberizid foragers: maximizing both binocular vision and fronto-lateral visual acuity.

Bret A Moore1, Diana Pita1, Luke P Tyrrell1, Esteban Fernández-Juricic2.   

Abstract

Avian species vary in their visual system configuration, but previous studies have often compared single visual traits between two to three distantly related species. However, birds use different visual dimensions that cannot be maximized simultaneously to meet different perceptual demands, potentially leading to trade-offs between visual traits. We studied the degree of inter-specific variation in multiple visual traits related to foraging and anti-predator behaviors in nine species of closely related emberizid sparrows, controlling for phylogenetic effects. Emberizid sparrows maximize binocular vision, even seeing their bill tips in some eye positions, which may enhance the detection of prey and facilitate food handling. Sparrows have a single retinal center of acute vision (i.e. fovea) projecting fronto-laterally (but not into the binocular field). The foveal projection close to the edge of the binocular field may shorten the time to gather and process both monocular and binocular visual information from the foraging substrate. Contrary to previous work, we found that species with larger visual fields had higher visual acuity, which may compensate for larger blind spots (i.e. pectens) above the center of acute vision, enhancing predator detection. Finally, species with a steeper change in ganglion cell density across the retina had higher eye movement amplitude, probably due to a more pronounced reduction in visual resolution away from the fovea, which would need to be moved around more frequently. The visual configuration of emberizid passive prey foragers is substantially different from that of previously studied avian groups (e.g. sit-and-wait and tactile foragers).
© 2015. Published by The Company of Biologists Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Birds; Visual acuity; Visual fields

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25750415     DOI: 10.1242/jeb.108613

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Biol        ISSN: 0022-0949            Impact factor:   3.312


  8 in total

1.  Mimicry-dependent lateralization in the visual inspection of foreign eggs by American robins.

Authors:  Hannah M Scharf; Katharine Stenstrom; Miri Dainson; Thomas J Benson; Esteban Fernandez-Juricic; Mark E Hauber
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2019-07-24       Impact factor: 3.703

2.  Great-tailed grackles can independently direct their eyes toward different targets.

Authors:  Jessica L Yorzinski
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2021-05-06       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 3.  Understanding the retinal basis of vision across species.

Authors:  Tom Baden; Thomas Euler; Philipp Berens
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2019-11-28       Impact factor: 34.870

4.  The Orientation of Visual Space from the Perspective of Hummingbirds.

Authors:  Luke P Tyrrell; Benjamin Goller; Bret A Moore; Douglas L Altshuler; Esteban Fernández-Juricic
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2018-01-30       Impact factor: 4.677

Review 5.  What Drives Bird Vision? Bill Control and Predator Detection Overshadow Flight.

Authors:  Graham R Martin
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2017-11-07       Impact factor: 4.677

6.  Avian binocular vision: It's not just about what birds can see, it's also about what they can't.

Authors:  Luke P Tyrrell; Esteban Fernández-Juricic
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-03-29       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Does retinal configuration make the head and eyes of foveate birds move?

Authors:  Bret A Moore; Luke P Tyrrell; Diana Pita; Olaf R P Bininda-Emonds; Esteban Fernández-Juricic
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-01-12       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Cryptochrome expression in avian UV cones: revisiting the role of CRY1 as magnetoreceptor.

Authors:  Atticus Pinzon-Rodriguez; Rachel Muheim
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-06-16       Impact factor: 4.379

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.