Literature DB >> 25750076

Consequences of the Chicago DSD Consensus: A Personal Perspective.

I A Hughes1.   

Abstract

A decade has passed since the Chicago Consensus meeting was convened to consider how to improve the management of individuals and their families with an intersex disorder. It is apposite to review, from an individual perspective, what impact the Consensus has had on clinical practice and research. Emphasis is placed on nomenclature and DSD classification, multidisciplinary team working, striving to reach a causative diagnosis for DSD, the value of uniformity of collective case registries for rare conditions, and the potential for meaningful clinical outcome studies and basic scientific research. The impact of the Consensus can be gauged objectively by an exponential increase in DSD-related publications in the medical and scientific literature and organisation of numerous national and international meetings. Psychologists and social scientists have embraced the subject area and enhanced the holistic approach to management of DSD. Much needs to be done to improve diagnosis, and to identify measures to predict outcome that can be used both in sex assignment decision-making and to improve the quality of life for young adults with DSD. Though challenging, these goals are attainable through specialist multidisciplinary clinics working at local level and the DSD community at large, collaborating at national and international levels to tap the data resources now being developed. © Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25750076     DOI: 10.1055/s-0035-1545274

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Horm Metab Res        ISSN: 0018-5043            Impact factor:   2.936


  8 in total

1.  Negotiating intersex: A case for revising the theory of social diagnosis.

Authors:  Tania M Jenkins; Susan E Short
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2016-12-31       Impact factor: 4.634

2.  Disorders of sexual development with XY karyotype and female phenotype: clinical findings and genetic background in a cohort from a single centre.

Authors:  G Costagliola; M Cosci O di Coscio; B Masini; F Baldinotti; M A Caligo; N Tyutyusheva; M R Sessa; D Peroni; S Bertelloni
Journal:  J Endocrinol Invest       Date:  2020-05-06       Impact factor: 4.256

Review 3.  Disorders/Differences of Sex Development Presenting in the Newborn With 46,XY Karyotype.

Authors:  Silvano Bertelloni; Nina Tyutyusheva; Margherita Valiani; Franco D'Alberton; Fulvia Baldinotti; Maria Adelaide Caligo; Giampiero I Baroncelli; Diego G Peroni
Journal:  Front Pediatr       Date:  2021-04-22       Impact factor: 3.418

4.  A novel missense mutation of NR5A1 c.46T>C (p.C16R) in a Chinese infant with ambiguous genitalia.

Authors:  Dan Zhang; Ying Xin; Ming-Yu Li; Ling-Zhe Meng; Ya-Jie Tong
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2022 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.054

5.  Should CAH in Females Be Classified as DSD?

Authors:  Ricardo González; Barbara M Ludwikowski
Journal:  Front Pediatr       Date:  2016-05-13       Impact factor: 3.418

6.  Analytical Review of Contemporary Fatwas in Resolving Biomedical Issues Over Gender Ambiguity.

Authors:  Taqwa Zabidi
Journal:  J Relig Health       Date:  2019-02

7.  Molecular Aspects of Sex Development in Mammals: New Insight for Practice.

Authors:  Laura Audí; Silvano Bertelloni; Christa E Flück
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2020-11-30       Impact factor: 5.923

Review 8.  Dynamic Testing for Evaluation of Adrenal and Gonadal Function in Pediatric and Adult Endocrinology: An Overview.

Authors:  Alpesh Goyal; Suraj Kubihal; Yashdeep Gupta; Viveka P Jyotsna; Rajesh Khadgawat
Journal:  Indian J Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2019 Nov-Dec
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.