Literature DB >> 25750038

Appropriate time for selective biliary cannulation by trainees during ERCP--a randomized trial.

Yanglin Pan1, Lina Zhao2, Joseph Leung3, Rongchun Zhang1, Hui Luo1, Xiangping Wang1, Zhiguo Liu1, Bingnian Wan1, Qin Tao1, Shaowei Yao1, Na Hui1, Daiming Fan1, Kaichun Wu1, Xuegang Guo1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIM: The allocation of sufficient time for trainees to attempt cannulation is necessary for learning and to ensure success with endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) training. However, it is important to balance the benefit to trainee practice against the potential risks to patients. The appropriate time for attempted cannulation by trainees remains unclear. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Three different time limits (5, 10, 15 minutes) were set for cannulation attempts made by four trainees in patients with native papilla undergoing ERCP. Patients were randomly assigned to the 5-, 10-, or 15-minute groups in a 1:1:1 ratio. Rectal indomethacin was used in high-risk patients. The primary outcome was successful cannulation within the allocated time. Secondary outcomes included performance scores, overall success rate, and post-ERCP pancreatitis (PEP).
RESULTS: A total of 256 patients were randomly assigned to the 5-minute (n = 84), 10-minute (n = 86), or 15-minute (n = 86) groups. Patients' baseline characteristics were comparable. Success rates for selective bile duct cannulation by trainees were 43.8 %, 75.0 %, and 71.8 % in the 5-, 10-, and 15-minute groups, respectively (P < 0.001). Trainees' self-reported performance scores and video assessment by an independent reviewer were comparable between the 10- and 15-minute groups, which were higher than the 5-minute group (both P  < 0.001). Trainers took over the cannulation procedure when trainees did not succeed within the allocated time. There was no significant difference in the overall success rates in cannulation between the three groups. No differences were noted in the use of rectal indomethacin and overall complication rates. Four patients in each group developed PEP (P = 0.996).
CONCLUSION: A time of 10 minutes was considered to be appropriate for trainees to attempt cannulation, with acceptable cannulation success rates and complications. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov number (NCT01851226). © Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25750038     DOI: 10.1055/s-0034-1391564

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Endoscopy        ISSN: 0013-726X            Impact factor:   10.093


  10 in total

1.  Measuring trainee competence in performing endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: A systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Theodor Voiosu; Paul Bălănescu; Andrei Voiosu; Andreea Benguş; Carmen Preda; Devica S Umans; Radu Bogdan Mateescu; Jeanin E van Hooft
Journal:  United European Gastroenterol J       Date:  2018-11-28       Impact factor: 4.623

2.  Young GI Angle: How to manage complications in interventional endoscopy.

Authors:  Henriette Heinrich; Marianna Arvanitakis
Journal:  United European Gastroenterol J       Date:  2020-07       Impact factor: 4.623

3.  Continuous Infusion of Fluid Hydration Over 24 Hours Does Not Prevent Post-Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography Pancreatitis.

Authors:  Arunchai Chang; Nonthalee Pausawasdi; Phunchai Charatcharoenwitthaya; Uayporn Kaosombatwattana; Tassanee Sriprayoon; Julajak Limsrivilai; Varayu Prachayakul; Somchai Leelakusolvong
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2021-10-15       Impact factor: 3.487

4.  What Would Be the Appropriate Number of Clinical ERCP Cases for Trainees to Acquire Basic Competence? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Wenkang Fu; Joseph Leung; Yudong Wang; Tang-Wei Chuang; Wei-Chih Liao; Wenbo Meng; Wence Zhou; Xun Li
Journal:  Turk J Gastroenterol       Date:  2021-01       Impact factor: 1.852

5.  Influence of night duty on endoscopic therapy for bile duct stones.

Authors:  Mitsuru Sugimoto; Tadayuki Takagi; Rei Suzuki; Naoki Konno; Hiroyuki Asama; Ko Watanabe; Jun Nakamura; Hitomi Kikuchi; Yuichi Waragai; Mika Takasumi; Takuto Hikichi; Hiromasa Ohira
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-11-14       Impact factor: 5.742

6.  Can Trainees Safely Perform Endoscopic Treatments for Common Bile Duct Stones? A Single-center Retrospective Study.

Authors:  Tomoya Iida; Hiroyuki Kaneto; Kohei Wagatsuma; Hajime Sasaki; Yumiko Naganawa; Suguru Nakagaki; Shuji Satoh; Haruo Shimizu; Hiroshi Nakase
Journal:  Intern Med       Date:  2018-02-09       Impact factor: 1.271

7.  ERCP PERFORMANCE IN A TERTIARY BRAZILIAN CENTER: FOCUS ON NEW RISK FACTORS, COMPLICATIONS AND QUALITY INDICATORS.

Authors:  Alana Costa Borges; Paulo César de Almeida; Stella Maria Torres Furlani; Marcelo de Sousa Cury; Douglas K Pleskow
Journal:  Arq Bras Cir Dig       Date:  2018-06-21

Review 8.  Pancreatitis after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: A narrative review.

Authors:  Igor Braga Ribeiro; Epifanio Silvino do Monte Junior; Antonio Afonso Miranda Neto; Igor Mendonça Proença; Diogo Turiani Hourneaux de Moura; Mauricio Kazuyoshi Minata; Edson Ide; Marcos Eduardo Lera Dos Santos; Gustavo de Oliveira Luz; Sergio Eiji Matuguma; Spencer Cheng; Renato Baracat; Eduardo Guimarães Hourneaux de Moura
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2021-05-28       Impact factor: 5.742

9.  Training in ERCP: a multifaceted enterprise now more than ever.

Authors:  James H Tabibian; Joseph W Leung
Journal:  Endosc Int Open       Date:  2018-01-16

10.  Does the presence of a trainee compromise success of biliary cannulation at ERCP?

Authors:  John Warwick Frost; Arun Kurup; Sharan Shetty; Neil Fisher
Journal:  Endosc Int Open       Date:  2017-06-23
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.