Literature DB >> 25750031

A high-efficiency recombineering system with PCR-based ssDNA in Bacillus subtilis mediated by the native phage recombinase GP35.

Zhaopeng Sun1, Aihua Deng, Ting Hu, Jie Wu, Qinyun Sun, Hua Bai, Guoqiang Zhang, Tingyi Wen.   

Abstract

Bacillus subtilis and its closely related species are important strains for industry, agriculture, and medicine. However, it is difficult to perform genetic manipulations using the endogenous recombination machinery. In many bacteria, phage recombineering systems have been employed to improve recombineering frequencies. To date, an efficient phage recombineering system for B. subtilis has not been reported. Here, we, for the first time, identified that GP35 from the native phage SPP1 exhibited a high recombination activity in B. subtilis. On this basis, we developed a high-efficiency GP35-meditated recombineering system. Taking single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) as a recombineering substrate, ten recombinases from diverse sources were investigated in B. subtilis W168. GP35 showed the highest recombineering frequency (1.71 ± 0.15 × 10(-1)). Besides targeting the purine nucleoside phosphorylase gene (deoD), we also demonstrated the utility of GP35 and Beta from Escherichia coli lambda phage by deleting the alpha-amylase gene (amyE) and uracil phosphoribosyltransferase gene (upp). In all three genetic loci, GP35 exhibited a higher frequency than Beta. Moreover, a phylogenetic tree comparing the kinship of different recombinase hosts with B. subtilis was constructed, and the relationship between the recombineering frequency and the kinship of the host was further analyzed. The results suggested that closer kinship to B. subtilis resulted in higher frequency in B. subtilis. In conclusion, the recombinase from native phage or prophage can significantly promote the genetic recombineering frequency in its host, providing an effective genetic tool for constructing genetically engineered strains and investigating bacterial physiology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25750031     DOI: 10.1007/s00253-015-6485-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Microbiol Biotechnol        ISSN: 0175-7598            Impact factor:   4.813


  15 in total

1.  Recombineering and MAGE.

Authors:  Timothy M Wannier; Peter N Ciaccia; Andrew D Ellington; Gabriel T Filsinger; Farren J Isaacs; Kamyab Javanmardi; Michaela A Jones; Aditya M Kunjapur; Akos Nyerges; Csaba Pal; Max G Schubert; George M Church
Journal:  Nat Rev Methods Primers       Date:  2021-01-14

2.  Recombineering in Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  Kelsi Penewit; Stephen J Salipante
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2022

3.  Improved bacterial recombineering by parallelized protein discovery.

Authors:  Timothy M Wannier; Akos Nyerges; Helene M Kuchwara; Márton Czikkely; Dávid Balogh; Gabriel T Filsinger; Nathaniel C Borders; Christopher J Gregg; Marc J Lajoie; Xavier Rios; Csaba Pál; George M Church
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-05-28       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  A highly precise and portable genome engineering method allows comparison of mutational effects across bacterial species.

Authors:  Ákos Nyerges; Bálint Csörgő; István Nagy; Balázs Bálint; Péter Bihari; Viktória Lázár; Gábor Apjok; Kinga Umenhoffer; Balázs Bogos; György Pósfai; Csaba Pál
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-02-16       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Characterizing the portability of phage-encoded homologous recombination proteins.

Authors:  Gabriel T Filsinger; Timothy M Wannier; Felix B Pedersen; Isaac D Lutz; Julie Zhang; Devon A Stork; Anik Debnath; Kevin Gozzi; Helene Kuchwara; Verena Volf; Stan Wang; Xavier Rios; Christopher J Gregg; Marc J Lajoie; Seth L Shipman; John Aach; Michael T Laub; George M Church
Journal:  Nat Chem Biol       Date:  2021-01-18       Impact factor: 15.040

6.  Development of a New Recombineering System for Agrobacterium Species.

Authors:  Zhilong Bian; Shanshan Li; Runyu Yang; Jia Yin; Youming Zhang; Qiang Tu; Jun Fu; Ruijuan Li
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2022-01-19       Impact factor: 5.005

7.  A standardized workflow for surveying recombinases expands bacterial genome-editing capabilities.

Authors:  Deirdre E Ricaurte; Esteban Martínez-García; Ákos Nyerges; Csaba Pál; Víctor de Lorenzo; Tomás Aparicio
Journal:  Microb Biotechnol       Date:  2017-11-02       Impact factor: 5.813

8.  Efficient and Scalable Precision Genome Editing in Staphylococcus aureus through Conditional Recombineering and CRISPR/Cas9-Mediated Counterselection.

Authors:  Kelsi Penewit; Elizabeth A Holmes; Kathyrn McLean; Mingxin Ren; Adam Waalkes; Stephen J Salipante
Journal:  MBio       Date:  2018-02-20       Impact factor: 7.867

9.  Mycoplasma pneumoniae Genome Editing Based on Oligo Recombineering and Cas9-Mediated Counterselection.

Authors:  Carlos Piñero-Lambea; Eva Garcia-Ramallo; Sira Martinez; Javier Delgado; Luis Serrano; Maria Lluch-Senar
Journal:  ACS Synth Biol       Date:  2020-06-22       Impact factor: 5.110

10.  Molecular Mechanisms That Contribute to Horizontal Transfer of Plasmids by the Bacteriophage SPP1.

Authors:  Ana Valero-Rello; María López-Sanz; Alvaro Quevedo-Olmos; Alexei Sorokin; Silvia Ayora
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2017-09-22       Impact factor: 5.640

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.