Literature DB >> 25749881

Hospital Evaluations by Social Media: A Comparative Analysis of Facebook Ratings among Performance Outliers.

McKinley Glover1, Omid Khalilzadeh2, Garry Choy2, Anand M Prabhakar3, Pari V Pandharipande2,4, G Scott Gazelle2,4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: An increasing number of hospitals and health systems utilize social media to allow users to provide feedback and ratings. The correlation between ratings on social media and more conventional hospital quality metrics remains largely unclear, raising concern that healthcare consumers may make decisions on inaccurate or inappropriate information regarding quality.
OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to examine the extent to which hospitals utilize social media and whether user-generated metrics on Facebook(®) correlate with a Hospital Compare(®) metric, specifically 30-day all cause unplanned hospital readmission rates. DESIGN AND PARTICIPANTS: This was a retrospective cross-sectional study conducted among all U.S. hospitals performing outside the confidence interval for the national average on 30-day hospital readmission rates as reported on Hospital Compare. Participants were 315 hospitals performing better than U.S. national rate on 30-day readmissions and 364 hospitals performing worse than the U.S. national rate. MAIN MEASURES: The study analyzed ratings of hospitals on Facebook's five-star rating scale, 30-day readmission rates, and hospital characteristics including beds, teaching status, urban vs. rural location, and ownership type. KEY
RESULTS: Hospitals performing better than the national average on 30-day readmissions were more likely to use Facebook than lower-performing hospitals (93.3 % vs. 83.5 %; p < 0.01). The average rating for hospitals with low readmission rates (4.15 ± 0.31) was higher than that for hospitals with higher readmission rates (4.05 ± 0.41, p < 0.01). Major teaching hospitals were 14.3 times more likely to be in the high readmission rate group. A one-star increase in Facebook rating was associated with increased odds of the hospital belonging to the low readmission rate group by a factor of 5.0 (CI: 2.6-10.3, p <  0.01), when controlling for hospital characteristics and Facebook-related variables.
CONCLUSIONS: Hospitals with lower rates of 30-day hospital-wide unplanned readmissions have higher ratings on Facebook than hospitals with higher readmission rates. These findings add strength to the concept that aggregate measures of patient satisfaction on social media correlate with more traditionally accepted measures of hospital quality.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Consumer health informatics; Patient satisfaction; Performance measurement

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25749881      PMCID: PMC4579224          DOI: 10.1007/s11606-015-3236-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gen Intern Med        ISSN: 0884-8734            Impact factor:   5.128


  25 in total

1.  Patient privacy and social media.

Authors:  Amy L Hader; Evan D Brown
Journal:  AANA J       Date:  2010-08

2.  Choosing the best hospital: the limitations of public quality reporting.

Authors:  Michael B Rothberg; Elizabeth Morsi; Evan M Benjamin; Penelope S Pekow; Peter K Lindenauer
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2008 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 6.301

3.  Public reporting, consumerism, and patient empowerment.

Authors:  Robert S Huckman; Mark A Kelley
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2013-10-16       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  Social media in disaster risk reduction and crisis management.

Authors:  David E Alexander
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2013-12-04       Impact factor: 3.525

5.  Social media: a brave new world for doctors.

Authors:  Stacey L Gulick
Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 5.532

6.  Take two aspirin and tweet me in the morning: how Twitter, Facebook, and other social media are reshaping health care.

Authors:  Carleen Hawn
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2009 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 6.301

Review 7.  Systematic review: the evidence that publishing patient care performance data improves quality of care.

Authors:  Constance H Fung; Yee-Wei Lim; Soeren Mattke; Cheryl Damberg; Paul G Shekelle
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2008-01-15       Impact factor: 25.391

Review 8.  Social media and rating sites as tools to understanding quality of care: a scoping review.

Authors:  Lise M Verhoef; Tom H Van de Belt; Lucien J L P G Engelen; Lisette Schoonhoven; Rudolf B Kool
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2014-02-20       Impact factor: 5.428

9.  Use of social media across US hospitals: descriptive analysis of adoption and utilization.

Authors:  Heather M Griffis; Austin S Kilaru; Rachel M Werner; David A Asch; John C Hershey; Shawndra Hill; Yoonhee P Ha; Allison Sellers; Kevin Mahoney; Raina M Merchant
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2014-11-27       Impact factor: 5.428

10.  Tweets about hospital quality: a mixed methods study.

Authors:  Felix Greaves; Antony A Laverty; Daniel Ramirez Cano; Karo Moilanen; Stephen Pulman; Ara Darzi; Christopher Millett
Journal:  BMJ Qual Saf       Date:  2014-04-19       Impact factor: 7.035

View more
  24 in total

1.  From Public to Social Reporting of Hospital Quality.

Authors:  Tara Lagu; Felix Greaves
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 5.128

2.  What Words Convey: The Potential for Patient Narratives to Inform Quality Improvement.

Authors:  Rachel Grob; Mark Schlesinger; Lacey Rose Barre; Naomi Bardach; Tara Lagu; Dale Shaller; Andrew M Parker; Steven C Martino; Melissa L Finucane; Jennifer L Cerully; Alina Palimaru
Journal:  Milbank Q       Date:  2019-03       Impact factor: 4.911

3.  Americans' Growing Exposure To Clinician Quality Information: Insights And Implications.

Authors:  Mark J Schlesinger; Lise Rybowski; Dale Shaller; Steven Martino; Andrew M Parler; Rachel Grob; Melissa Finucane; Jennifer Cerully
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2019-03       Impact factor: 6.301

4.  Physician Beliefs About Online Reporting of Quality and Experience Data.

Authors:  Tara Lagu; Jacqueline Haskell; Emily Cooper; Daniel A Harris; Anne Murray; Rebekah L Gardner
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2019-08-28       Impact factor: 5.128

5.  Rate Your Addiction Treatment Facility: Exploring the Quality Chasm Online.

Authors:  Kevin M Chen; David A Fiellin
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2020-06       Impact factor: 5.128

6.  (Can't Get No) Patient Satisfaction: The Predictive Power of Demographic, GI, and Psychological Factors in IBS Patients.

Authors:  Brian M Quigley; Christopher C Sova; Darren M Brenner; Laurie A Keefer; Michael D Sitrin; Christopher D Radziwon; Susan S Krasner; Jeffrey M Lackner
Journal:  J Clin Gastroenterol       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 3.062

7.  Online Reviews of Specialized Drug Treatment Facilities-Identifying Potential Drivers of High and Low Patient Satisfaction.

Authors:  Anish K Agarwal; Vivien Wong; Arthur M Pelullo; Sharath Guntuku; Daniel Polsky; David A Asch; Jonathan Muruako; Raina M Merchant
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2020-06       Impact factor: 5.128

8.  Yelp Reviews Of Hospital Care Can Supplement And Inform Traditional Surveys Of The Patient Experience Of Care.

Authors:  Benjamin L Ranard; Rachel M Werner; Tadas Antanavicius; H Andrew Schwartz; Robert J Smith; Zachary F Meisel; David A Asch; Lyle H Ungar; Raina M Merchant
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 6.301

9.  Automatic gender detection in Twitter profiles for health-related cohort studies.

Authors:  Yuan-Chi Yang; Mohammed Ali Al-Garadi; Jennifer S Love; Jeanmarie Perrone; Abeed Sarker
Journal:  JAMIA Open       Date:  2021-06-23

Review 10.  Patient Education and Engagement through Social Media.

Authors:  Sravya Chirumamilla; Martha Gulati
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rev       Date:  2021
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.