BACKGROUND: Without a reliable biopsy technique for pancreatic cysts, consensus-based guidelines are used to guide surgical utilization. The primary objective of this study was to characterize the proportion of operations performed outside of these guidelines. METHODS: A 5-year retrospective review between July 1, 2007, and June 30, 2012, was performed of consecutive patients seen at a single tertiary medical center for a pancreatic cyst. Manual chart review for relevant clinical variables and cyst characteristics was performed. RESULTS: During this period, 148 patients underwent surgery, and of these, 23 (16 %) patients had no high-risk criteria by the 2006 Sendai criteria. None of these harbored high-grade dysplastic or cancerous lesions. A high cyst carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) level (35 %), patient anxiety (26 %), and physician concern (22 %) were explicit reasons to proceed to surgery. An elevated cyst CEA level >192 ng/ml was the most significant predictor (OR 5.14 (95 % confidence interval (CI) 1.47-18.0) for surgery without high-risk criteria. CONCLUSION: A high cyst CEA level was significantly associated with the decision to operate outside of consensus-based guidelines. The misuse of cyst CEA in the management of pancreatic cysts negatively impacts patient anxiety, increases physician uncertainty, and leads to surgery with minimal benefit.
BACKGROUND: Without a reliable biopsy technique for pancreatic cysts, consensus-based guidelines are used to guide surgical utilization. The primary objective of this study was to characterize the proportion of operations performed outside of these guidelines. METHODS: A 5-year retrospective review between July 1, 2007, and June 30, 2012, was performed of consecutive patients seen at a single tertiary medical center for a pancreatic cyst. Manual chart review for relevant clinical variables and cyst characteristics was performed. RESULTS: During this period, 148 patients underwent surgery, and of these, 23 (16 %) patients had no high-risk criteria by the 2006 Sendai criteria. None of these harbored high-grade dysplastic or cancerous lesions. A high cyst carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) level (35 %), patientanxiety (26 %), and physician concern (22 %) were explicit reasons to proceed to surgery. An elevated cyst CEA level >192 ng/ml was the most significant predictor (OR 5.14 (95 % confidence interval (CI) 1.47-18.0) for surgery without high-risk criteria. CONCLUSION: A high cyst CEA level was significantly associated with the decision to operate outside of consensus-based guidelines. The misuse of cyst CEA in the management of pancreatic cysts negatively impacts patientanxiety, increases physician uncertainty, and leads to surgery with minimal benefit.
Authors: Camilo Correa-Gallego; Cristina R Ferrone; Sarah P Thayer; Jennifer A Wargo; Andrew L Warshaw; Carlos Fernández-Del Castillo Journal: Pancreatology Date: 2010-05-17 Impact factor: 3.996
Authors: Walter Gwang-Up Park; Ranjan Mascarenhas; Mario Palaez-Luna; Thomas C Smyrk; Dennis O'Kane; Jonathan E Clain; Michael J Levy; Randall K Pearson; Bret T Petersen; Mark D Topazian; Santhi S Vege; Suresh T Chari Journal: Pancreas Date: 2011-01 Impact factor: 3.327
Authors: Sevdenur Cizginer; Brian G Turner; Brian Turner; A Reyyan Bilge; Cetin Karaca; Martha B Pitman; William R Brugge Journal: Pancreas Date: 2011-10 Impact factor: 3.327
Authors: Gareth Morris-Stiff; Greg Lentz; Sricharan Chalikonda; Michael Johnson; Charles Biscotti; Tyler Stevens; R Matthew Walsh Journal: Surgery Date: 2010-08-24 Impact factor: 3.982
Authors: William R Brugge; Kent Lewandrowski; Elizabeth Lee-Lewandrowski; Barbara A Centeno; Tara Szydlo; Susan Regan; Carlos Fernandez del Castillo; Andrew L Warshaw Journal: Gastroenterology Date: 2004-05 Impact factor: 22.682
Authors: Thomas A Laffan; Karen M Horton; Alison P Klein; Bruce Berlanstein; Stanley S Siegelman; Satomi Kawamoto; Pamela T Johnson; Elliot K Fishman; Ralph H Hruban Journal: AJR Am J Roentgenol Date: 2008-09 Impact factor: 3.959
Authors: Asif Khalid; Maliha Zahid; Sydney D Finkelstein; Julia K LeBlanc; Neeraj Kaushik; Nuzhat Ahmad; William R Brugge; Steven A Edmundowicz; Robert H Hawes; Kevin M McGrath Journal: Gastrointest Endosc Date: 2009-01-18 Impact factor: 9.427
Authors: Michael Sighinolfi; Susan Y Quan; Yvonne Lee; Alvaro Ibaseta; Kimberly Pham; Monica M Dua; George A Poultsides; Brendan C Visser; Jeffery A Norton; Walter G Park Journal: Dig Dis Sci Date: 2017-01-23 Impact factor: 3.199
Authors: Sam L Ivry; Jeremy M Sharib; Dana A Dominguez; Nilotpal Roy; Stacy E Hatcher; Michele T Yip-Schneider; C Max Schmidt; Randall E Brand; Walter G Park; Matthias Hebrok; Grace E Kim; Anthony J O'Donoghue; Kimberly S Kirkwood; Charles S Craik Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2017-04-19 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Vallabh Suresh; Kaleb Byers; Ummadisetti Chinna Rajesh; Francesco Caiazza; Gina Zhu; Charles S Craik; Kimberly Kirkwood; Vincent Jo Davisson; Daniel A Sheik Journal: Diagnostics (Basel) Date: 2022-05-28