Shane R Durkin1,2, Lachlan D M Farmer3, Susith Kulasekara4, Jagjit Gilhotra1,2. 1. Discipline of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, The University of Adelaide, Level 8, East Wing, Royal Adelaide Hospital, North Terrace, Adelaide, SA, 5000, Australia. 2. Adelaide Eye and Retina Centre, 18 North Terrace, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia. 3. Discipline of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, The University of Adelaide, Level 8, East Wing, Royal Adelaide Hospital, North Terrace, Adelaide, SA, 5000, Australia. lachlan.farmer@gmail.com. 4. Vitreoretina Fellow, Department of Ophthalmology, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
Abstract
PURPOSE: We investigated visual acuity outcomes and their associations in the setting of retinal pigment epithelium tear (RPET) following the use of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) agents. METHODS: This retrospective review included all patients treated for neovascular age-related macular degeneration (AMD) with an anti-VEGF agent who subsequently developed an RPET. All patients who developed an RPET were identified and outcome measures data were recorded and analysed. The main outcome measures were best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and spectral domain optical coherence tomography characteristics. RESULTS: Among the 14 participants identified, a subfoveal RPET was associated with the loss of one or more lines of vision from baseline (p = 0.03). There was no association between the size of the RPET and BCVA at the time of the RPET or final BCVA. The development of a disciform scar was associated both with a BCVA at the time of the RPET of < 6/24 (p = 0.02) and a final BCVA of < 6/24 (p = 0.02). Ongoing treatment with an anti-VEGF agent following an RPET saw five patients (35.7 %) have an improvement in their BCVA and all patients maintained their BCVA following the RPET with ongoing anti-VEGF treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Visual decline following an RPET is associated with subfoveal location of the RPET (p = 0.03) and later development of a disciform scar. These data also suggest that the ongoing use of an anti-VEGF agent may stabilise vision in some patients following an RPET and for some patients there may be an improvement in visual acuity despite the RPET, depending on its location.
PURPOSE: We investigated visual acuity outcomes and their associations in the setting of retinal pigment epithelium tear (RPET) following the use of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) agents. METHODS: This retrospective review included all patients treated for neovascular age-related macular degeneration (AMD) with an anti-VEGF agent who subsequently developed an RPET. All patients who developed an RPET were identified and outcome measures data were recorded and analysed. The main outcome measures were best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and spectral domain optical coherence tomography characteristics. RESULTS: Among the 14 participants identified, a subfoveal RPET was associated with the loss of one or more lines of vision from baseline (p = 0.03). There was no association between the size of the RPET and BCVA at the time of the RPET or final BCVA. The development of a disciform scar was associated both with a BCVA at the time of the RPET of < 6/24 (p = 0.02) and a final BCVA of < 6/24 (p = 0.02). Ongoing treatment with an anti-VEGF agent following an RPET saw five patients (35.7 %) have an improvement in their BCVA and all patients maintained their BCVA following the RPET with ongoing anti-VEGF treatment. CONCLUSIONS:Visual decline following an RPET is associated with subfoveal location of the RPET (p = 0.03) and later development of a disciform scar. These data also suggest that the ongoing use of an anti-VEGF agent may stabilise vision in some patients following an RPET and for some patients there may be an improvement in visual acuity despite the RPET, depending on its location.
Authors: Clement K Chan; Prema Abraham; Carsten H Meyer; Gregg T Kokame; Peter K Kaiser; Michael E Rauser; Jeffrey G Gross; Asha S D Nuthi; Steven G Lin; Noha S Daher Journal: Retina Date: 2010-02 Impact factor: 4.256
Authors: David M Brown; Peter K Kaiser; Mark Michels; Gisele Soubrane; Jeffrey S Heier; Robert Y Kim; Judy P Sy; Susan Schneider Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2006-10-05 Impact factor: 91.245