Anna M Mersov1, David E Crane2, Michael A Chappell3, Sandra E Black4, Bradley J MacIntosh5. 1. Department of Speech Language Pathology, University of Toronto, 160-500 University Avenue, Toronto, ON M5G 1V7, Canada; Canadian Partnership for Stroke Recovery, Canada. 2. Canadian Partnership for Stroke Recovery, Canada. 3. Institute of Biomedical Engineering, University of Oxford, Headington, Oxford OX3 7DQ, UK. 4. Canadian Partnership for Stroke Recovery, Canada; LC Campbell Cognitive Neurology Research Unit, Brain Science Research Program, Canada. 5. Department of Medical Biophysics, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5G 2M9, Canada; Canadian Partnership for Stroke Recovery, Canada; Physical Sciences, Sunnybrook Research Institute, Canada. Electronic address: bmac@sri.utoronto.ca.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Voxel-based analyses are pervasive across the range of neuroimaging techniques. In the case of perfusion imaging using arterial spin labelling (ASL), a low signal-to-noise technique, there is a tradeoff between the contrast-to-noise required to detect a perfusion abnormality and its spatial localisation. In exploratory studies, the use of an a priori region of interest (ROI), which has the benefit of averaging multiple voxels, may not be justified. Thus the question considered in this study pertains to the sample size that is required to detect a voxel-level perfusion difference between groups and two algorithms are considered. NEW METHOD: Empirical 3T ASL data were acquired from 25 older adults and simulations were performed based on the group template cerebral blood flow (CBF) images. General linear model (GLM) and permutation-based algorithms were tested for their ability to detect a predefined hypoperfused ROI. Simulation parameters included: inter and intra-subject variability, degree of hypoperfusion and sample size. The true positive rate was used as a measure of sensitivity. RESULTS: For a modest group perfusion difference, i.e., 10%, 37 participants per group were required when using the permutation-based algorithm, whereas 20 participants were required for the GLM-based algorithm. COMPARISON WITH EXISTING METHODS: This study advances the perfusion power calculation literature by considering a voxel-wise analysis with correction for multiple comparison. CONCLUSIONS: The sample size requirement to detect group differences decreased exponentially in proportion to increased degree of hypoperfusion. In addition, sensitivity to detect a perfusion abnormality was influenced by the choice of algorithm.
BACKGROUND: Voxel-based analyses are pervasive across the range of neuroimaging techniques. In the case of perfusion imaging using arterial spin labelling (ASL), a low signal-to-noise technique, there is a tradeoff between the contrast-to-noise required to detect a perfusion abnormality and its spatial localisation. In exploratory studies, the use of an a priori region of interest (ROI), which has the benefit of averaging multiple voxels, may not be justified. Thus the question considered in this study pertains to the sample size that is required to detect a voxel-level perfusion difference between groups and two algorithms are considered. NEW METHOD: Empirical 3T ASL data were acquired from 25 older adults and simulations were performed based on the group template cerebral blood flow (CBF) images. General linear model (GLM) and permutation-based algorithms were tested for their ability to detect a predefined hypoperfused ROI. Simulation parameters included: inter and intra-subject variability, degree of hypoperfusion and sample size. The true positive rate was used as a measure of sensitivity. RESULTS: For a modest group perfusion difference, i.e., 10%, 37 participants per group were required when using the permutation-based algorithm, whereas 20 participants were required for the GLM-based algorithm. COMPARISON WITH EXISTING METHODS: This study advances the perfusion power calculation literature by considering a voxel-wise analysis with correction for multiple comparison. CONCLUSIONS: The sample size requirement to detect group differences decreased exponentially in proportion to increased degree of hypoperfusion. In addition, sensitivity to detect a perfusion abnormality was influenced by the choice of algorithm.
Keywords:
Arterial spin labelling; Cerebral blood flow; General linear model; Group comparison; Permutation testing; Region of interest; True positive rate
Authors: Wilby Williamson; Adam J Lewandowski; Nils D Forkert; Ludovica Griffanti; Thomas W Okell; Jill Betts; Henry Boardman; Timo Siepmann; David McKean; Odaro Huckstep; Jane M Francis; Stefan Neubauer; Renzo Phellan; Mark Jenkinson; Aiden Doherty; Helen Dawes; Eleni Frangou; Christina Malamateniou; Charlie Foster; Paul Leeson Journal: JAMA Date: 2018-08-21 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Karen M Barlow; Kartik Iyer; Tingting Yan; Alex Scurfield; Helen Carlson; Yang Wang Journal: J Neurotrauma Date: 2021-02-03 Impact factor: 4.869