Sofia Papadiochou1, Ioannis Emmanouil2, Ioannis Papadiochos3. 1. Postgraduate student, Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece. Electronic address: sofiapapadiochou@gmail.com. 2. Associate Professor, Department of Removable Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece. 3. Resident, Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Evangelismos Hospital, Athens, Greece.
Abstract
STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: Denture adhesives have been the objective of scientific research for over half a century. Although they are used by denture wearers worldwide, investigations of their effectiveness and biocompatibility have led to controversial conclusions. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to review the literature data with regard to the effectiveness and biocompatibility of denture adhesives as well as the attitudes of both patients and dental professionals toward these materials. MATERIAL AND METHODS: An electronic search of English peer-reviewed dental literature in the Medline database was conducted to evaluate the effectiveness and biocompatibility of denture adhesives. There was no limitation in publication year, so the search included all the available scientific evidence included in that particular database until March 2014. Specific inclusion criteria were used for the selection of the appropriate articles. A manual search of the citations of the obtained articles followed to extend the electronic search. RESULTS: A full text review was carried out for only 32 articles. Of the 32 articles, 21 examined the efficacy of denture adhesives in terms of retention and stability and masticatory performance, 6 evaluated the issue of the biocompatibility of denture adhesives, and 5 presented the attitudes of either professionals or patients toward these materials. CONCLUSIONS: The majority of clinical studies supported the fact that denture adhesives enhance the retention, stability, and masticatory performance of a removable prosthesis. In terms of biocompatibility, long-term in vivo studies to investigate potential harmful effects were lacking. Patients are satisfied with denture adhesives that meet their needs.
STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: Denture adhesives have been the objective of scientific research for over half a century. Although they are used by denture wearers worldwide, investigations of their effectiveness and biocompatibility have led to controversial conclusions. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to review the literature data with regard to the effectiveness and biocompatibility of denture adhesives as well as the attitudes of both patients and dental professionals toward these materials. MATERIAL AND METHODS: An electronic search of English peer-reviewed dental literature in the Medline database was conducted to evaluate the effectiveness and biocompatibility of denture adhesives. There was no limitation in publication year, so the search included all the available scientific evidence included in that particular database until March 2014. Specific inclusion criteria were used for the selection of the appropriate articles. A manual search of the citations of the obtained articles followed to extend the electronic search. RESULTS: A full text review was carried out for only 32 articles. Of the 32 articles, 21 examined the efficacy of denture adhesives in terms of retention and stability and masticatory performance, 6 evaluated the issue of the biocompatibility of denture adhesives, and 5 presented the attitudes of either professionals or patients toward these materials. CONCLUSIONS: The majority of clinical studies supported the fact that denture adhesives enhance the retention, stability, and masticatory performance of a removable prosthesis. In terms of biocompatibility, long-term in vivo studies to investigate potential harmful effects were lacking. Patients are satisfied with denture adhesives that meet their needs.
Authors: Afsoon Fallahi; Nona Khadivi; Nima Roohpour; Andrew M Middleton; Mehdi Kazemzadeh-Narbat; Nasim Annabi; Ali Khademhosseini; Ali Tamayol Journal: Dent Mater Date: 2017-12-06 Impact factor: 5.304
Authors: V H Chalapathi Kumar; Hemchand Surapaneni; V Ravikiran; B Sarat Chandra; Srilatha Balusu; V Naveen Reddy Journal: J Int Soc Prev Community Dent Date: 2016-05-30
Authors: Norberto Martins de Oliveira Junior; Danny Omar Mendoza Marin; Andressa Rosa Perin Leite; Ana Carolina Pero; Marlise Inêz Klein; Marco Antonio Compagnoni Journal: PLoS One Date: 2018-10-10 Impact factor: 3.240