| Literature DB >> 25748551 |
Julien Adjedj1, Gabor G Toth2, Bernard De Bruyne3.
Abstract
Until recently, our understanding of coronary artery disease (CAD) has been largely based on a purely anatomical approach as derived from the invasive angiogram. The confirmation of the diagnosis of "significant" CAD, the assessment of its extent, the risk stratification of patients, the therapeutic decisions, the definition of study end-points, and the validation of non-invasive testing, all mainly relied on "eyeballing" the angiogram, i.e. a subjective evaluation of the presence of at least 50% (or 70%) diameter stenosis.With the development of invasive, wire-based, means to quantify coronary pressure and flow with high spatial resolution, one realized that purely angiographic metrics correlated poorly with functional information. Currently, it is admitted that both anatomical and functional information are needed to define CAD and to optimize its management. In the present review, we summarize the main characteristics of invasive functional indices of ischemia and perfusion.Entities:
Keywords: Coronary angiogram; Coronary artery disease; Coronary flow reserve; Fractional flow reserve; Index of microvascular resistance; Ischemic testing; Microcirculation
Mesh:
Year: 2015 PMID: 25748551 DOI: 10.1016/j.pcad.2015.03.002
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Prog Cardiovasc Dis ISSN: 0033-0620 Impact factor: 8.194