Literature DB >> 25748209

Visual Acuity and Experience with Magnification Devices in Swiss Dental Practices.

M Eichenberger, P Perrin, S T Ramseyer, A Lussi.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The aims of the present study in Swiss dental practices were 1) to provide an update on the prevalence of different magnification devices, 2) to examine the relationship between self-assessed and objectively measured visual acuity, and 3) to evaluate the visual performance of dentists in the individually optimized clinical situation of their respective practices. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Sixty-nine dentists from 40 randomly selected private practices (n=20, <40 years; n=49, ≥40 years) participated in the study. A questionnaire was provided to evaluate the self-assessed near visual acuity and the experience with magnification devices. The objective near visual acuity was measured under standardized conditions on a negatoscope. The clinical situation, including the use of habitual optical aids, was evaluated with visual tests on a phantom head.
RESULTS: A total of 64% of the dentists owned a dental loupe: 45% Galilean loupes, 16% Keplerian loupes, and 3% single lens loupes. In total, 19% of the questioned dentists owned a microscope in addition to the loupes. The correlation between the self-assessed and the objective visual performance of the dentists was weak (Spearman rank correlation coefficient=0.25). In the habitual clinical situation, magnification devices (p=0.03) and the dentist's age (p=0.0012) had a significant influence on the visual performance.
CONCLUSIONS: Many dentists were not aware of their visual handicaps. Optical aids such as loupes or microscopes should be used early enough to compensate for individual or age-related visual deficiencies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25748209     DOI: 10.2341/14-103-C

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oper Dent        ISSN: 0361-7734            Impact factor:   2.440


  11 in total

1.  [Effects of loupes and microscope on laminate veneer preparation].

Authors:  Y J Ge; X Q Liu
Journal:  Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban       Date:  2019-02-18

2.  Evaluation of five methods to identify composite restorations in human teeth on a forensic purpose-an ex vivo comparative study.

Authors:  Florence C Auderset; Thomas Connert; Christian Meller; Andreas Filippi; Dorothea C Dagassan-Berndt
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2022-08-10       Impact factor: 2.791

3.  Application of medical magnifying loupes in diagnosis of oral mucosal diseases.

Authors:  Yuting Zhang; Peiyang Yuan; Han Jiang; Xuemei Qiu; Jiongke Wang; Xiaobo Luo; Hongxia Dan; Yu Zhou; Xin Zeng; Lu Jiang; Qianming Chen
Journal:  Zhejiang Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban       Date:  2021-04-25

4.  Awareness, Attitude, and Prevalence of usage of magnification devices among the dental practitioners in the state of Andhra Pradesh - A questionnaire-based study.

Authors:  Gautami Subhadra Penmetsa; Loda Princee Mani; Gadde Praveen; Chini Dorai Dwarakanath; S Suresh
Journal:  J Indian Soc Periodontol       Date:  2017 Sep-Oct

5.  Effect of magnification devices on dental students' visual acuity.

Authors:  Danielle Wajngarten; Patrícia Petromilli Nordi Sasso Garcia
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-03-27       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Minimal invasive microscopic tooth preparation in esthetic restoration: a specialist consensus.

Authors:  Haiyang Yu; Yuwei Zhao; Junying Li; Tian Luo; Jing Gao; Hongchen Liu; Weicai Liu; Feng Liu; Ke Zhao; Fei Liu; Chufan Ma; Juergen M Setz; Shanshan Liang; Lin Fan; Shanshan Gao; Zhuoli Zhu; Jiefei Shen; Jian Wang; Zhimin Zhu; Xuedong Zhou
Journal:  Int J Oral Sci       Date:  2019-10-02       Impact factor: 6.344

7.  Ergonomic working posture in simulated dental clinical conditions: effect of magnification on the operator's experience.

Authors:  Danielle Wajngarten; Júlia Margato Pazos; Patricia Petromilli Nordi Sasso Garcia
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2021-04-08       Impact factor: 2.984

8.  Magnification effect on fine motor skills of dental students.

Authors:  Danielle Wajngarten; Júlia Margato Pazos; Vinícius Perassoli Menegazzo; Juliana Pimentel Duarte Novo; Patrícia Petromilli Nordi Sasso Garcia
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-11-08       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Effect of magnification factor by Galilean loupes on working posture of dental students in simulated clinical procedures: associations between direct and observational measurements.

Authors:  Júlia Margato Pazos; Simone Cecilio Hallak Regalo; Paulo de Vasconcelos; Juliana Alvares Duarte Bonini Campos; Patricia Petromilli Nordi Sasso Garcia
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2022-03-10       Impact factor: 2.984

Review 10.  Magnification in endodontics: A review of its application and acceptance among dental practitioners.

Authors:  Jun Fay Low; Tuti Ningseh Mohd Dom; Safura Anita Baharin
Journal:  Eur J Dent       Date:  2018 Oct-Dec
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.