| Literature DB >> 25747688 |
Jihad Makhoul1, Leila El-Alti1, Yara Qutteina2, Catherine Nasrallah2, Carol Sakr1, Rima Nakkash3, Khalid Alali2.
Abstract
A recent surge of research universities and human subjects research funding in the Arab world raises concerns about applied research ethics and oversight. In-depth interviews conducted with 52 researchers in Lebanon and Qatar about their research conduct and the problems they face while conducting it indicate that although researchers admit to the added value of institutional review board (IRB) functions, the researchers have several complaints, such as rigid and contextually insensitive requirements, delays, and inadequate resources at IRBs, and a lack of outreach and effective communication with researchers. The study discusses these challenges pointing to the need for socioculturally adaptive regulations and forms and strengthening outreach and communication between IRBs and their users to improve ethical practices. Implications for future research are also presented.Entities:
Keywords: Arab world; IRB; challenges; humans subjects research; qualitative methods; research ethics; researchers’ experience
Mesh:
Year: 2014 PMID: 25747688 DOI: 10.1177/1556264614553170
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics ISSN: 1556-2646 Impact factor: 1.742