Literature DB >> 25747433

Computed tomography scan versus upper gastrointestinal fluoroscopy for diagnosis of staple line leak following bariatric surgery.

Jason Bingham1, Robert Shawhan2, Ross Parker2, Jay Wigboldy2, Vance Sohn2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The best radiographic modality to diagnose staple line leaks following bariatric surgery remains controversial. Two common studies used are upper gastrointestinal (UGI) fluoroscopy and computed tomography (CT). This study sought to determine the better modality in detecting clinically significant postoperative leaks.
METHODS: This retrospective review was performed of patients undergoing imaging for suspected staple line leaks following bariatric surgery. These studies were reinterpreted by 2 radiologists who were blinded to the original findings.
RESULTS: Six hundred nineteen radiographic "leak tests" were selectively performed following bariatric procedures at our institution between January 2005 and December 2011. CT was found to have a sensitivity of 95% (95% confidence interval [CI] 81.8 to 99.1) and a specificity of 100% (95% CI 93.1 to 100) in diagnosing postoperative leaks, while UGI demonstrated a sensitivity of 79.4% (95% CI 61.6 to 90.0) and a specificity of 95% (95% CI 85.2 to 98.7).
CONCLUSION: CT is a superior modality compared with UGI for detecting staple line leaks following bariatric surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Anastomotic leak; Bariatric surgery; Computed tomography; Upper GI fluoroscopy

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25747433     DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2015.01.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Surg        ISSN: 0002-9610            Impact factor:   2.565


  7 in total

1.  Diagnostic Laparoscopy or CT Scan to Diagnose the Leak Following Bariatric Surgery.

Authors:  A Hussain; S El-Hasani
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 4.129

2.  Early Routine Upper Gastrointestinal Contrast Study Following Bariatric Surgery: an Indispensable Postoperative Care or a Medicolegal Heritage?

Authors:  Francesco Pennestrì; Francesca Prioli; Luca Sessa; Pierpaolo Gallucci; Luigi Ciccoritti; Piero Giustacchini; Brunella Barbaro; Maria Gabriella Brizi; Pietro Princi; Rocco Bellantone; Marco Raffaelli
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 4.129

3.  Feasibility of optimized ultralow-dose pulsed fluoroscopy for upper gastrointestinal tract examinations: a phantom study with clinical correlation.

Authors:  Jakob Weiss; Andreas Pomschar; Carsten Rist; Klement Neumaier; Minglun Li; Wilhelm Flatz; Kolja Thierfelder; Mike Notohamiprodjo
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2017-07-22       Impact factor: 3.469

4.  Efficacy of Postoperative Upper Gastrointestinal Series (UGI) and Computed Tomography (CT) Scan in Bariatric Surgery: a Meta-analysis on 7516 Patients.

Authors:  Mario Musella; Valeria Cantoni; Roberta Green; Wanda Acampa; Nunzio Velotti; Paola Maietta; Alberto Cuocolo
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 4.129

5.  Comparison of Imaging Modalities for Detecting Complications in Bariatric Surgery.

Authors:  Sergio Susmallian; Eduard Folb; Royi Barnea; Asnat Raziel
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 4.129

6.  Computed Tomography Assessment of Gastric Band Slippage.

Authors:  Jeremy R Burt; Madison R Kocher; Lauren Snider; Jeffrey Waltz; Jordan Heston Chamberlin; Gilberto J Aquino; Vincent Giovagnoli; Megan Mercer; Nicholas Feranec
Journal:  Visc Med       Date:  2022-05-06

7.  Comparison of upper gastrointestinal fluoroscopy versus computed tomography for evaluation of post-operative leak in a bariatric surgery patient.

Authors:  Tim Xu; Nicholas Rosculet; Kimberley Steele; Martin Auster
Journal:  BJR Case Rep       Date:  2016-07-22
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.