Literature DB >> 25747298

Exploring determinants of surrogate decision-maker confidence: an example from the ICU.

Dragana Bolcic-Jankovic1, Brian R Clarridge2, Jessica L LeBlanc2, Rumel S Mahmood2, Anthony M Roman2, Bradley D Freeman3.   

Abstract

This article is an exploratory data analysis of the determinants of confidence in a surrogate decision maker who has been asked to permit an intensive care unit (ICU) patient's participation in genetic research. We pursue the difference between surrogates' and patients' confidence that the surrogate can accurately represent the patient's wishes. The article also explores whether greater confidence leads to greater agreement between patients and surrogates. Our data come from a survey conducted in three hospital ICUs. We interviewed 445 surrogates and 214 patients. The only thing that influences patients' confidence in their surrogate's decision is whether they had prior discussions with him or her; however, there are more influences operating on the surrogate's self-confidence. More confident surrogates are more likely to match their patients' wishes. Patients are more likely to agree to research participation than their surrogates would allow. The surrogates whose response did not match as closely were less trusting of the hospital staff, were less likely to allow patient participation if there were no direct benefits to the patient, had given less thought about the way genetic research is conducted, and were much less likely to have a person in their life who they would trust to make decisions for them if they were incapacitated.
© The Author(s) 2014.

Entities:  

Keywords:  agreement; confidence; critical care; patient; surrogate decision maker

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25747298     DOI: 10.1177/1556264614545036

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics        ISSN: 1556-2646            Impact factor:   1.742


  4 in total

1.  Processes of consent in research for adults with impaired mental capacity nearing the end of life: systematic review and transparent expert consultation (MORECare_Capacity statement).

Authors:  C J Evans; E Yorganci; P Lewis; J Koffman; K Stone; I Tunnard; B Wee; W Bernal; M Hotopf; I J Higginson
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2020-07-22       Impact factor: 8.775

2.  Does difficulty functioning in the surrogate role equate to vulnerability in critical illness research? Use of path analysis to examine the relationship between difficulty providing substituted judgment and receptivity to critical illness research participation.

Authors:  Brian R Clarridge; Dragana Bolcic-Jankovic; Jessica LeBlanc; Rumel S Mahmood; Carie R Kennedy; Bradley D Freeman
Journal:  J Crit Care       Date:  2015-07-26       Impact factor: 3.425

3.  Advances and challenges in conducting ethical trials involving populations lacking capacity to consent: A decade in review.

Authors:  Victoria Shepherd
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2020-06-08       Impact factor: 2.226

4.  Defining Familial Interactions and Networks: An Exploratory Qualitative Study on Family Networks and Surrogate Decision-Making.

Authors:  Sarah V Harvey; Adam Y Adenwala; Meghan B Lane-Fall
Journal:  Crit Care Explor       Date:  2021-07-29
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.