Literature DB >> 25747295

Why does geoprivacy matter? The scientific publication of confidential data presented on maps.

Ourania Kounadi1, Michael Leitner2.   

Abstract

We examined published maps containing sensitive data, and the protection methods, if any, that were used. We investigated whether the many published warnings about disclosure risk have been effective in reducing privacy risk. During an 8-year period (2005-2012), 19 journals related to GIScience, geography, spatial crime analysis, and health geography were examined. We identified 41 articles that display actual confidential information and 16 articles where confidential information is protected by the use of a geographical mask. During the investigated time frame, the numbers of articles with unmasked confidential data increased, and in total more than 68,000 home addresses were disclosed. One of the more significant findings of this study is that efforts to instill sensitivity to location privacy and disclosure risk have been relatively unsuccessful.
© The Author(s) 2014.

Keywords:  confidentiality; disclosure analysis; geographical masks; location privacy

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25747295     DOI: 10.1177/1556264614544103

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics        ISSN: 1556-2646            Impact factor:   1.742


  8 in total

1.  Leveraging Differential Privacy in Geospatial Analyses of Standardized Healthcare Data.

Authors:  Daniel R Harris
Journal:  Proc IEEE Int Conf Big Data       Date:  2020-12

2.  Environmental conditions, mobile digital culture, mobile usability, knowledge of app in COVID-19 risk mitigation: A structural equation model analysis.

Authors:  Muhideen Sayibu; Jianxun Chu; Tosin Yinka Akintunde; Olayemi Hafeez Rufai; Tunde Simeon Amosun; Glory George-Ufot
Journal:  Smart Health (Amst)       Date:  2022-05-16

3.  Confidentiality considerations for use of social-spatial data on the social determinants of health: Sexual and reproductive health case study.

Authors:  Danielle F Haley; Stephen A Matthews; Hannah L F Cooper; Regine Haardörfer; Adaora A Adimora; Gina M Wingood; Michael R Kramer
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2016-08-08       Impact factor: 4.634

4.  Street masking: a network-based geographic mask for easily protecting geoprivacy.

Authors:  David Swanlund; Nadine Schuurman; Paul Zandbergen; Mariana Brussoni
Journal:  Int J Health Geogr       Date:  2020-07-06       Impact factor: 3.918

5.  A Geoprivacy by Design Guideline for Research Campaigns That Use Participatory Sensing Data.

Authors:  Ourania Kounadi; Bernd Resch
Journal:  J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics       Date:  2018-04-23       Impact factor: 1.742

Review 6.  Ethical considerations in the use of GPS-based movement tracking in health research - lessons from a care-seeking study in rural west India.

Authors:  Aditi Apte; Vijendra Ingole; Pallavi Lele; Andrew Marsh; Tathagata Bhattacharjee; Siddhivinayak Hirve; Harry Campbell; Harish Nair; Sarah Chan; Sanjay Juvekar
Journal:  J Glob Health       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 4.413

7.  Web-based GIS for spatial pattern detection: application to malaria incidence in Vietnam.

Authors:  Thanh Quang Bui; Hai Minh Pham
Journal:  Springerplus       Date:  2016-07-08

8.  Addressing the data guardian and geospatial scientist collaborator dilemma: how to share health records for spatial analysis while maintaining patient confidentiality.

Authors:  Jayakrishnan Ajayakumar; Andrew J Curtis; Jacqueline Curtis
Journal:  Int J Health Geogr       Date:  2019-12-21       Impact factor: 3.918

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.