Literature DB >> 25747007

In vivo functional analysis of the Drosophila melanogaster nicotinic acetylcholine receptor Dα6 using the insecticide spinosad.

Jason Somers1, Joseph Nguyen2, Chris Lumb3, Phil Batterham4, Trent Perry5.   

Abstract

The vinegar fly, Drosophila melanogaster, has been used to identify and manipulate insecticide resistance genes. The advancement of genome engineering technology and the increasing availability of pest genome sequences has increased the predictive and diagnostic capacity of the Drosophila model. The Drosophila model can be extended to investigate the basic biology of the interaction between insecticides and the proteins they target. Recently we have developed an in vivo system that permits the expression and study of key insecticide targets, the nicotinic acetylcholine receptors (nAChRs), in controlled genetic backgrounds. Here this system is used to study the interaction between the insecticide spinosad and a nAChR subunit, Dα6. Reciprocal chimeric subunits were created from Dα6 and Dα7, a subunit that does not respond to spinosad. Using the in vivo system, the Dα6/Dα7 chimeric subunits were tested for their capacity to respond to spinosad. Only the subunits containing the C-terminal region of Dα6 were able to respond to spinosad, thus confirming the importance this region for spinosad binding. A new incompletely dominant, spinosad resistance mechanism that may evolve in pest species is also examined. First generated using chemical mutagenesis, the Dα6(P146S) mutation was recreated using the Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeats (CRISPR)/Cas9 system, the first use of this technology to introduce a resistant mutation into a controlled genetic background. Both alleles present with the same incompletely dominant, spinosad resistance phenotype, proving the P146S replacement to be the causal mutation. The proximity of the P146S mutation to the conserved Cys-loop indicates that it may impair the gating of the receptor. The results of this study enhance the understanding of nAChR structure:function relationships. Crown
Copyright © 2015. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CRISPR; Drosophila melanogaster; Insecticide resistance; Mutagenesis; Nicotinic acetylcholine receptor; Spinosad

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25747007     DOI: 10.1016/j.ibmb.2015.01.018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Insect Biochem Mol Biol        ISSN: 0965-1748            Impact factor:   4.714


  15 in total

1.  Pleiotropic Effects of Loss of the Dα1 Subunit in Drosophila melanogaster: Implications for Insecticide Resistance.

Authors:  Jason Somers; Hang Ngoc Bao Luong; Judith Mitchell; Philip Batterham; Trent Perry
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2016-11-09       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Residue distribution and risk assessment of two macrocyclic lactone insecticides in green onion using micro-liquid-liquid extraction (MLLE) technique coupled with liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry.

Authors:  Farag Malhat; Osama Abdallah
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2019-08-22       Impact factor: 2.513

3.  Deletion of the nicotinic acetylcholine receptor subunit gene Dα1 confers insecticide resistance, but at what cost?

Authors:  Jason Somers; Hang Ngoc Bao Luong; Philip Batterham; Trent Perry
Journal:  Fly (Austin)       Date:  2017-11-22       Impact factor: 2.160

4.  Resistance mutation conserved between insects and mites unravels the benzoylurea insecticide mode of action on chitin biosynthesis.

Authors:  Vassilis Douris; Denise Steinbach; Rafaela Panteleri; Ioannis Livadaras; John Anthony Pickett; Thomas Van Leeuwen; Ralf Nauen; John Vontas
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-12-05       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Slo2/KNa Channels in Drosophila Protect against Spontaneous and Induced Seizure-like Behavior Associated with an Increased Persistent Na+ Current.

Authors:  Nathan Byers; Eu-Teum Hahm; Susan Tsunoda
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2021-09-20       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Low doses of the organic insecticide spinosad trigger lysosomal defects, elevated ROS, lipid dysregulation, and neurodegeneration in flies.

Authors:  Felipe Martelli; Natalia H Hernandes; Zhongyuan Zuo; Julia Wang; Ching-On Wong; Nicholas E Karagas; Ute Roessner; Thusita Rupasinghe; Charles Robin; Kartik Venkatachalam; Trent Perry; Philip Batterham; Hugo J Bellen
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2022-02-22       Impact factor: 8.713

Review 7.  Genome engineering: Drosophila melanogaster and beyond.

Authors:  Koen J T Venken; Alejandro Sarrion-Perdigones; Paul J Vandeventer; Nicholas S Abel; Audrey E Christiansen; Kristi L Hoffman
Journal:  Wiley Interdiscip Rev Dev Biol       Date:  2015-10-08       Impact factor: 5.814

8.  The invertebrate pharmacology of insecticides acting at nicotinic acetylcholine receptors.

Authors:  Andrew J Crossthwaite; Aurelien Bigot; Philippe Camblin; Jim Goodchild; Robert J Lind; Russell Slater; Peter Maienfisch
Journal:  J Pestic Sci       Date:  2017-08-20       Impact factor: 1.519

9.  A three amino acid deletion in the transmembrane domain of the nicotinic acetylcholine receptor α6 subunit confers high-level resistance to spinosad in Plutella xylostella.

Authors:  Jing Wang; Xingliang Wang; Stuart J Lansdell; Jianheng Zhang; Neil S Millar; Yidong Wu
Journal:  Insect Biochem Mol Biol       Date:  2016-02-06       Impact factor: 4.714

10.  A CRISPR/Cas9 mediated point mutation in the alpha 6 subunit of the nicotinic acetylcholine receptor confers resistance to spinosad in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Christoph T Zimmer; William T Garrood; A Mirel Puinean; Manuela Eckel-Zimmer; Martin S Williamson; T G Emyr Davies; Chris Bass
Journal:  Insect Biochem Mol Biol       Date:  2016-04-24       Impact factor: 4.714

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.