Literature DB >> 25746913

Assessing temporal modulation sensitivity using electrically evoked auditory steady state responses.

Robert Luke1, Lieselot Van Deun2, Michael Hofmann2, Astrid van Wieringen2, Jan Wouters2.   

Abstract

Temporal cues are important for cochlear implant (CI) users when listening to speech. Users with greater sensitivity to temporal modulations show better speech recognition and modifications to stimulation parameters based on modulation sensitivity have resulted in improved speech understanding. Behavioural measures of temporal sensitivity require cooperative participants and a large amount of time. These limitations have motivated the desire for an objective measure with which to appraise temporal sensitivity for CI users. Electrically evoked auditory steady state responses (EASSRs) are neural responses to periodic electrical stimulation that have been used to predict threshold (T) levels. In this study we evaluate the use of EASSRs as a tool for assessing temporal modulation sensitivity. Modulation sensitivity was assessed behaviourally using modulation detection thresholds (MDTs) for a 20 Hz rate. On the same stimulation sites, EASSRS were measured using sinusoidally amplitude modulated pulse trains at 4 and 40 Hz. Measurements were taken using a bipolar configuration on 12 electrode pairs over 5 participants. Results showed that EASSR amplitudes and signal-to-noise ratios (SNRs) were significantly related to the MDTs. Larger EASSRs corresponded with sites of improved modulation sensitivity. This relation was driven by across-subject variation. This result indicates that EASSRs may be used as an objective measure of site-specific temporal sensitivity for CI users.
Copyright © 2015 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25746913     DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2015.02.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hear Res        ISSN: 0378-5955            Impact factor:   3.208


  6 in total

1.  Effects of aging and hearing loss on perceptual and electrophysiological measures of pulse-rate discrimination.

Authors:  Lindsay DeVries; Samira Anderson; Matthew J Goupell; Ed Smith; Sandra Gordon-Salant
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2022-03       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Analysis methods for measuring passive auditory fNIRS responses generated by a block-design paradigm.

Authors:  Robert Luke; Eric Larson; Maureen J Shader; Hamish Innes-Brown; Lindsey Van Yper; Adrian K C Lee; Paul F Sowman; David McAlpine
Journal:  Neurophotonics       Date:  2021-05-22       Impact factor: 3.593

3.  Acoustic Change Responses to Amplitude Modulation in Cochlear Implant Users: Relationships to Speech Perception.

Authors:  Ji-Hye Han; Andrew Dimitrijevic
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2020-02-18       Impact factor: 4.677

4.  Stimulus-evoked phase-locked activity along the human auditory pathway strongly varies across individuals.

Authors:  Robin Gransier; Michael Hofmann; Astrid van Wieringen; Jan Wouters
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-01-08       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Characterizing Cochlear implant artefact removal from EEG recordings using a real human model.

Authors:  Jaime A Undurraga; Lindsey Van Yper; Manohar Bance; David McAlpine; Deborah Vickers
Journal:  MethodsX       Date:  2021-04-25

6.  Electrophysiological assessment of temporal envelope processing in cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Robin Gransier; Robert P Carlyon; Jan Wouters
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-09-21       Impact factor: 4.379

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.