Literature DB >> 25746796

Monitoring in vivo (re)modeling: a computational approach using 4D microCT data to quantify bone surface movements.

Annette I Birkhold1, Hajar Razi2, Richard Weinkamer3, Georg N Duda4, Sara Checa5, Bettina M Willie6.   

Abstract

Bone undergoes continual damage repair and structural adaptation to changing external loads with the aim of maintaining skeletal integrity throughout life. The ability to monitor bone (re)modeling would allow for a better understanding in how various pathologies and interventions affect bone turnover and subsequent bone strength. To date, however, current methods to monitor bone (re)modeling over time and in space are limited. We propose a novel method to visualize and quantify bone turnover, based on in vivo microCT imaging and a 4D computational approach. By in vivo tracking of spatially correlated formation and resorption sites over time it classifies bone restructuring into (re)modeling sequences, the spatially and temporally linked sequences of formation, resorption and quiescent periods on the bone surface. The microCT based method was validated using experimental data from an in vivo mouse tibial loading model and ex vivo data of the mouse tibia. In this application, the method allows the visualization of time-resolved cortical (re)modeling and the quantification of short-term and long-term modeling on the endocortical and periosteal surface at the mid-diaphysis of loaded and control mice tibiae. Both short-term and long-term modeling processes, independent formation and resorption events, could be monitored and modeling (spatially not correlated formation and resorption) and remodeling (resorption followed by new formation at the same site) could be distinguished on the bone surface. This novel method that combines in vivo microCT with a computational approach is a powerful tool to monitor bone turnover in animal models now and is waiting to be applied to human patients in the near future.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bone; Micro-Ct; Monitoring; Mouse; Remodeling

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25746796     DOI: 10.1016/j.bone.2015.02.027

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bone        ISSN: 1873-2763            Impact factor:   4.398


  21 in total

Review 1.  Bone Homeostasis and Repair: Forced Into Shape.

Authors:  Alesha B Castillo; Philipp Leucht
Journal:  Curr Rheumatol Rep       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 4.592

2.  Experimental studies of bone mechanoadaptation: bridging in vitro and in vivo studies with multiscale systems.

Authors:  Genevieve N Brown; Rachel L Sattler; X Edward Guo
Journal:  Interface Focus       Date:  2016-02-06       Impact factor: 3.906

Review 3.  In vivo Visualisation and Quantification of Bone Resorption and Bone Formation from Time-Lapse Imaging.

Authors:  Patrik Christen; Ralph Müller
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 5.096

4.  In vivo monitoring of bone microstructure by propagation-based phase-contrast computed tomography using monochromatic synchrotron light.

Authors:  Takeshi Matsumoto; Ryota Shimizu; Kentaro Uesugi
Journal:  Lab Invest       Date:  2019-10-22       Impact factor: 5.662

5.  Mechanical regulation of bone formation and resorption around implants in a mouse model of osteopenic bone.

Authors:  Zihui Li; Duncan Betts; Gisela Kuhn; Michael Schirmer; Ralph Müller; Davide Ruffoni
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2019-03-29       Impact factor: 4.118

6.  A new approach to analyzing regenerated bone quality in the mouse digit amputation model using semi-automatic processing of microCT data.

Authors:  Kevin F Hoffseth; Jennifer Simkin; Emily Busse; Kennon Stewart; James Watt; Andrew Chapple; Aaron Hargrove; Mimi C Sammarco
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2020-12-02       Impact factor: 4.398

Review 7.  Mechanical Stimuli in the Local In Vivo Environment in Bone: Computational Approaches Linking Organ-Scale Loads to Cellular Signals.

Authors:  Graeme R Paul; Angad Malhotra; Ralph Müller
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 5.096

Review 8.  Murine Axial Compression Tibial Loading Model to Study Bone Mechanobiology: Implementing the Model and Reporting Results.

Authors:  Russell P Main; Sandra J Shefelbine; Lee B Meakin; Matthew J Silva; Marjolein C H van der Meulen; Bettina M Willie
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2019-10-23       Impact factor: 3.102

9.  Activation, development, and attenuation of modeling- and remodeling-based bone formation in adult rats.

Authors:  Wenzheng Wang; Wei-Ju Tseng; Hongbo Zhao; Tala Azar; Shaopeng Pei; Xi Jiang; Nathaniel Dyment; X Sherry Liu
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2021-07-09       Impact factor: 15.304

10.  The Periosteal Bone Surface is Less Mechano-Responsive than the Endocortical.

Authors:  Annette I Birkhold; Hajar Razi; Georg N Duda; Richard Weinkamer; Sara Checa; Bettina M Willie
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-03-23       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.