Michael W Sjoding1, Theodore J Iwashyna, Justin B Dimick, Colin R Cooke. 1. 1Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI. 2VA Center for Clinical Management Research, Ann Arbor, MI. 3Institute for Social Research, Ann Arbor, MI. 4Department of Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI. 5Center for Healthcare Outcomes and Policy, Institute for Healthcare Innovation & Policy, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Risk-standardized 30-day mortality and hospital readmission rates for pneumonia are increasingly being tied to hospital reimbursement to incentivize the delivery of high-quality care. Such measures may be susceptible to gaming by recoding patients with pneumonia to a primary diagnosis of sepsis or respiratory failure. We sought to determine the degree to which hospitals can game mortality or readmission measures and change their rankings by recoding patients with pneumonia. DESIGN AND SETTING: Simulated experimental study of 2,906 U.S. acute care hospitals with at least 25 admissions for pneumonia using 2009 Medicare data. PATIENTS: Elderly (age ≥ 65 yr) Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries hospitalized with pneumonia. Patients eligible for recoding to sepsis or respiratory failure were those with a principal International Classification of Diseases, 9th Edition, Clinical Modification, discharge code for pneumonia and secondary codes for respiratory failure or acute organ dysfunction. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: We measured the number of hospitals that improved their pneumonia mortality or readmission rates after recoding eligible patients. When a sample of 100 hospitals with pneumonia mortality rates above the 50th percentile recoded all eligible patients to sepsis or respiratory failure, 90 hospitals (95% CI, 84-95) improved their mortality rate (mean improvement, 1.09%; 95% CI, 0.94-1.28%) and 41 hospitals dropped below the 50th percentile (95% CI, 33-52). When a sample of 100 hospitals with pneumonia readmission rates above the 50th percentile recoded all eligible patients, 66 hospitals (95% CI, 54-75) improved their readmission rate (mean improvement, 0.34%; 95% CI, 0.19-0.45%) and 15 hospitals (95% CI, 9-22) dropped below the 50th percentile. CONCLUSIONS: Hospitals can improve apparent pneumonia mortality and readmission rates by recoding pneumonia patients. Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services should consider changes to their methods used to calculate hospital-level pneumonia outcome measures to make them less susceptible to gaming.
OBJECTIVE: Risk-standardized 30-day mortality and hospital readmission rates for pneumonia are increasingly being tied to hospital reimbursement to incentivize the delivery of high-quality care. Such measures may be susceptible to gaming by recoding patients with pneumonia to a primary diagnosis of sepsis or respiratory failure. We sought to determine the degree to which hospitals can game mortality or readmission measures and change their rankings by recoding patients with pneumonia. DESIGN AND SETTING: Simulated experimental study of 2,906 U.S. acute care hospitals with at least 25 admissions for pneumonia using 2009 Medicare data. PATIENTS: Elderly (age ≥ 65 yr) Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries hospitalized with pneumonia. Patients eligible for recoding to sepsis or respiratory failure were those with a principal International Classification of Diseases, 9th Edition, Clinical Modification, discharge code for pneumonia and secondary codes for respiratory failure or acute organ dysfunction. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: We measured the number of hospitals that improved their pneumonia mortality or readmission rates after recoding eligible patients. When a sample of 100 hospitals with pneumonia mortality rates above the 50th percentile recoded all eligible patients to sepsis or respiratory failure, 90 hospitals (95% CI, 84-95) improved their mortality rate (mean improvement, 1.09%; 95% CI, 0.94-1.28%) and 41 hospitals dropped below the 50th percentile (95% CI, 33-52). When a sample of 100 hospitals with pneumonia readmission rates above the 50th percentile recoded all eligible patients, 66 hospitals (95% CI, 54-75) improved their readmission rate (mean improvement, 0.34%; 95% CI, 0.19-0.45%) and 15 hospitals (95% CI, 9-22) dropped below the 50th percentile. CONCLUSIONS: Hospitals can improve apparent pneumonia mortality and readmission rates by recoding pneumoniapatients. Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services should consider changes to their methods used to calculate hospital-level pneumonia outcome measures to make them less susceptible to gaming.
Authors: Mitchell M Levy; Mitchell P Fink; John C Marshall; Edward Abraham; Derek Angus; Deborah Cook; Jonathan Cohen; Steven M Opal; Jean-Louis Vincent; Graham Ramsay Journal: Crit Care Med Date: 2003-04 Impact factor: 7.598
Authors: T P Meehan; M J Fine; H M Krumholz; J D Scinto; D H Galusha; J T Mockalis; G F Weber; M K Petrillo; P M Houck; J M Fine Journal: JAMA Date: 1997-12-17 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: S F Jencks; T Cuerdon; D R Burwen; B Fleming; P M Houck; A E Kussmaul; D S Nilasena; D L Ordin; D R Arday Journal: JAMA Date: 2000-10-04 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Peter K Lindenauer; Susannah M Bernheim; Jacqueline N Grady; Zhenqiu Lin; Yun Wang; Yongfei Wang; Angela R Merrill; Lein F Han; Michael T Rapp; Elizabeth E Drye; Sharon-Lise T Normand; Harlan M Krumholz Journal: J Hosp Med Date: 2010 Jul-Aug Impact factor: 2.960
Authors: Hallie C Prescott; Kenneth M Langa; Vincent Liu; Gabriel J Escobar; Theodore J Iwashyna Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 2014-07-01 Impact factor: 30.528
Authors: Hallie C Prescott; Tara M Cope; Foster C Gesten; Tatiana A Ledneva; Marcus E Friedrich; Theodore J Iwashyna; Tiffany M Osborn; Christopher W Seymour; Mitchell M Levy Journal: Crit Care Med Date: 2018-05 Impact factor: 7.598
Authors: Thomas S Valley; Michael W Sjoding; Andrew M Ryan; Theodore J Iwashyna; Colin R Cooke Journal: JAMA Date: 2015 Sep 22-29 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Andrew M Ibrahim; Justin B Dimick; Shashank S Sinha; John M Hollingsworth; Ushapoorna Nuliyalu; Andrew M Ryan Journal: JAMA Intern Med Date: 2018-02-01 Impact factor: 21.873
Authors: Jason D Buxbaum; Peter K Lindenauer; Colin R Cooke; Ushapoorna Nuliyalu; Andrew M Ryan Journal: Health Serv Res Date: 2019-10-10 Impact factor: 3.402
Authors: Shruti K Gohil; Chenghua Cao; Michael Phelan; Thomas Tjoa; Chanu Rhee; Richard Platt; Susan S Huang Journal: Clin Infect Dis Date: 2016-01-19 Impact factor: 9.079