Literature DB >> 25746541

Acute type B aortic dissection with communicating vs. non-communicating false lumen.

Koichi Akutsu1, Hideaki Yoshino, Tetsuya Tobaru, Kenichi Hagiya, Yusuke Watanabe, Keiji Tanaka, Nobuya Koyama, Takeshi Yamamoto, Ken Nagao, Morimasa Takayama.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In practice, patients with acute aortic dissection (AAD) are generally divided into 2 groups according to the status of the false lumen: non-communicating or communicating. The similarities and differences between the 2 groups, however, have not been fully determined in a large population. METHODS AND 
RESULTS: We studied 502 patients with Stanford type B AAD. Clinical background at symptom onset was compared, and similarities and differences characterized, for patients with non-communicating (NC group, n=288) vs. communicating (C group, n=214) false lumens. Time of day (00.00-06.00 hours, 06.00-12.00 hours, 12.00-18.00 hours, and 18.00-24.00 hours) and extent of physical activity (extreme exertion, slight exertion, at rest, and sleeping) at symptom onset were similar between groups. Patients in the NC group were older (mean age, 71±11 years vs. 64±14 years, P<0.01) and had lower prevalence of distally extended aortic dissection (26% vs. 8%, P<0.01) and deaths in hospital (2% vs. 7%, P=0.011) than those in the C group.
CONCLUSIONS: At symptom onset, clinical circumstances and physical activity were similar between the groups, and old age and a background of DeBakey IIIa aortic dissection may be associated with determination of false lumen status. The outcome in the NC group was better than in the C group.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25746541     DOI: 10.1253/circj.CJ-14-0828

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circ J        ISSN: 1346-9843            Impact factor:   2.993


  6 in total

1.  Is systolic blood pressure high in patients with acute aortic dissection on first medical contact before hospital transfer?

Authors:  Koichi Akutsu; Hideaki Yoshino; Tomoki Shimokawa; Hitoshi Ogino; Takashi Kunihara; Toshiyuki Takahashi; Michio Usui; Kazuhiro Watanabe; Tetsuya Tobaru; Kenichi Hagiya; Wataru Shimizu; Tetsuya Niino; Mitsuhiro Kawata; Hiroshi Masuhara; Yoshinori Watanabe; Nobuko Yoshida; Takeshi Yamamoto; Ken Nagao; Morimasa Takayama
Journal:  Heart Vessels       Date:  2019-05-06       Impact factor: 2.037

2.  Serum Ceruloplasmin Is the Candidate Predictive Biomarker for Acute Aortic Dissection and Is Related to Thrombosed False Lumen: a Propensity Score-Matched Observational Case-Control Study.

Authors:  Changcheng Ma; Haibin Zhao; Feng Shi; Mu Li; Xun Liu; Chao Ji; Yanshuo Han
Journal:  Biol Trace Elem Res       Date:  2020-06-05       Impact factor: 3.738

Review 3.  Update on the Therapeutic Strategy of Type B Aortic Dissection.

Authors:  Shuichiro Kaji
Journal:  J Atheroscler Thromb       Date:  2017-11-10       Impact factor: 4.928

4.  Serum amyloid a protein as a potential biomarker in predicting acute onset and association with in-hospital death in acute aortic dissection.

Authors:  Yuchen He; Changcheng Ma; Jia Xing; Shiyue Wang; Chao Ji; Yanshuo Han; Jian Zhang
Journal:  BMC Cardiovasc Disord       Date:  2019-12-03       Impact factor: 2.298

5.  Aortic Agatston score correlates with the progression of acute type A aortic dissection.

Authors:  Yasushi Tashima; Shinichi Iwakoshi; Takeshi Inoue; Noriyuki Nakamura; Taichi Sano; Naoyuki Kimura; Takashi Inoue; Koichi Adachi; Atsushi Yamaguchi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-02-11       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Sex-Related Differences in Clinical Features and In-Hospital Outcomes of Type B Acute Aortic Dissection: A Registry Study.

Authors:  Toshiyuki Takahashi; Hideaki Yoshino; Koichi Akutsu; Tomoki Shimokawa; Hitoshi Ogino; Takashi Kunihara; Michio Usui; Kazuhiro Watanabe; Mitsuhiro Kawata; Hiroshi Masuhara; Manabu Yamasaki; Takeshi Yamamoto; Ken Nagao; Morimasa Takayama
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2022-05-02       Impact factor: 6.106

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.