Literature DB >> 25746196

Patients' impression of change following treatment for chronic pain: global, specific, a single dimension, or many?

Whitney Scott1, Lance M McCracken2.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: The Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) measure has frequently been used as an indicator of meaningful change in treatments for chronic pain. However, limited research has examined the validity of PGIC items despite their wide adoption in clinical trials for pain. Additionally, research has not yet examined predictors of PGIC ratings following psychologically based treatment for pain. The purpose of the present study was to examine the validity, factor structure, and predictors of PGIC ratings following an interdisciplinary psychologically based treatment for chronic pain. Patients with chronic pain (N = 476) completed standard assessments of pain, daily functioning, and depression before and after a 4-week treatment program based on the principles of acceptance and commitment therapy. Following the program, patients rated 1 item assessing their impression of change overall and several items assessing their impression of more specific changes: physical and social functioning, work-related activities, mood, and pain. Results indicated that the global and specific impression of change items represent a single component. In the context of the acceptance and commitment therapy-based treatment studied here, overall PGIC ratings appeared to be influenced to a greater degree by patients' experienced improvements in physical activities and mood than by improvements in pain. The findings suggest that in addition to a single overall PGIC rating, domain-specific items may be relevant for some treatment trials. PERSPECTIVE: This article reports on the validity and predictors of patients' impression of change ratings following interdisciplinary psychologically based treatment for pain. In addition to a single overall PGIC rating, domain-specific items may be important for clinicians and researchers to consider depending on the focus of treatment.
Copyright © 2015 American Pain Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Chronic pain; Patient Impression of Change (PIC); acceptance of pain; outcome; psychological treatment

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25746196     DOI: 10.1016/j.jpain.2015.02.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pain        ISSN: 1526-5900            Impact factor:   5.820


  36 in total

1.  Analgesic reduction during an interdisciplinary pain management programme: treatment effects and processes of change.

Authors:  Beth J Guildford; Aisling Daly-Eichenhardt; Bethany Hill; Karen Sanderson; Lance M McCracken
Journal:  Br J Pain       Date:  2017-10-02

2.  The chronic pain skills study: Protocol for a randomized controlled trial comparing hypnosis, mindfulness meditation and pain education in Veterans.

Authors:  Rhonda M Williams; Dawn M Ehde; Melissa Day; Aaron P Turner; Shahin Hakimian; Kevin Gertz; Marcia Ciol; Alisha McCall; Carrie Kincaid; Mark W Pettet; David Patterson; Pradeep Suri; Mark P Jensen
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2020-01-09       Impact factor: 2.226

3.  Prescription Opioid Taper Support for Outpatients With Chronic Pain: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Mark D Sullivan; Judith A Turner; Cory DiLodovico; Angela D'Appollonio; Kari Stephens; Ya-Fen Chan
Journal:  J Pain       Date:  2016-11-28       Impact factor: 5.820

Review 4.  A Comparative Meta-Analysis of Unidisciplinary Psychology and Interdisciplinary Treatment Outcomes Following Acceptance and Commitment Therapy for Adults with Chronic Pain.

Authors:  Kevin E Vowles; Melissa Pielech; Karlyn A Edwards; Mindy L McEntee; Robert W Bailey
Journal:  J Pain       Date:  2019-11-02       Impact factor: 5.820

Review 5.  Clinical Features, Neuroimaging, and Levodopa-Responsiveness in Holmes' Tremor: A Video-Based Case-Series with a Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Anumeha Mishra; Sanjay Pandey
Journal:  Mov Disord Clin Pract       Date:  2022-07-07

6.  Focused Evidence Review: Psychometric Properties of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures for Chronic Musculoskeletal Pain.

Authors:  Elizabeth S Goldsmith; Brent C Taylor; Nancy Greer; Maureen Murdoch; Roderick MacDonald; Lauren McKenzie; Christina E Rosebush; Timothy J Wilt
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2018-05       Impact factor: 5.128

7.  Developing a real-world evidence base for prescribed cannabis in the United Kingdom: preliminary findings from Project Twenty21.

Authors:  C Sakal; M Lynskey; A K Schlag; D J Nutt
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2021-05-10       Impact factor: 4.530

8.  LOAD-intensity and time-under-tension of exercises for men who have Achilles tendinopathy (the LOADIT trial): a randomised feasibility trial.

Authors:  Fatmah Hasani; Terry Haines; Shannon E Munteanu; Peter Schoch; Bill Vicenzino; Peter Malliaras
Journal:  BMC Sports Sci Med Rehabil       Date:  2021-05-25

9.  Efficacy of a combination of hypnosis and transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation for chronic non-cancer pain: A randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Louise Tonye-Geoffroy; Stéphanie Mauboussin Carlos; Sophie Tuffet; Hélène Fromentin; Laurence Berard; Judith Leblanc; Françoise Laroche
Journal:  J Adv Nurs       Date:  2021-03-30       Impact factor: 3.187

10.  MIS-TLIF versus O-TLIF for single-level degenerative stenosis: study protocol for randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Olga N Leonova; Evgeny A Cherepanov; Aleksandr V Krutko
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2021-03-05       Impact factor: 2.692

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.