Literature DB >> 25746024

Longitudinal assessment of inflammation in recipients of continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices.

Liza Grosman-Rimon1, Ira Jacobs2, Laura C Tumiati3, Michael A McDonald3, Stacey Pollock Bar-Ziv2, Avi Fuks3, Hiroyuki Kawajiri3, Julieta Lazarte3, Arash Ghashghai3, Daniel J Shogilev3, David Z Cherney4, Vivek Rao5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The long-term effects of continuous-flow left ventricular assist device (CF-LVAD) support on trends of inflammatory markers over time are unknown. We examined the hypothesis that the levels of inflammatory markers in CF-LVAD recipients are higher than in healthy controls and that these levels increase over time with long-term CF-LVAD support.
METHODS: We examined the levels of inflammatory markers longitudinally at baseline before CF-LVAD implantation and at 3, 6, and 9 months after implantation. We then compared the levels of inflammatory markers to those in a healthy control group.
RESULTS: Compared with baseline values before CF-LVAD implantation, left ventricular end-diastolic diameter (LVEDd) and left ventricular end-systolic diameter (LVESd) decreased significantly at 3, 6, and 9 months after CF-LVAD implantation. Brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) levels dropped significantly after CF-LVAD implantation but did not normalize. Improvements in ejection fraction at 3, 6, and 9 months after CF-LVAD implantation did not reach significance. Monocyte chemoattractant protein-1, interferon γ-induced protein, and C-reactive protein levels were higher in the CF-LVAD recipients at each of the time points (baseline before CF-LVAD implantation and 3, 6, and 9 months after implantation) compared with levels in healthy controls. In CF-LVAD recipients, serum interleukin-8, tumour necrosis factor-α, and macrophage inflammatory protein-β increased significantly at 9 months, and macrophage-derived chemokine increased at 6 months after CF-LVAD implantation compared with baseline.
CONCLUSIONS: Despite improvements in LV dimensions and BNP levels, markers of inflammation remained higher in CF-LVAD recipients. High levels of inflammation in CF-LVAD recipients may result from heart failure preconditioning or the long-term device support, or both. Because inflammation may be detrimental to CF-LVAD recipients, future studies should determine whether inflammatory pathways are reversible.
Copyright © 2015 Canadian Cardiovascular Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25746024     DOI: 10.1016/j.cjca.2014.12.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can J Cardiol        ISSN: 0828-282X            Impact factor:   5.223


  10 in total

Review 1.  Biomarkers to Predict Reverse Remodeling and Myocardial Recovery in Heart Failure.

Authors:  Shweta R Motiwala; Hanna K Gaggin
Journal:  Curr Heart Fail Rep       Date:  2016-10

2.  Gut microbiota, endotoxemia, inflammation, and oxidative stress in patients with heart failure, left ventricular assist device, and transplant.

Authors:  Melana Yuzefpolskaya; Bruno Bohn; Mojdeh Nasiri; Amelia M Zuver; Drew D Onat; Eugene A Royzman; Joseph Nwokocha; Melissa Mabasa; Alberto Pinsino; Danielle Brunjes; Antonia Gaudig; Autumn Clemons; Pauline Trinh; Stephania Stump; Marla J Giddins; Veli K Topkara; A Reshad Garan; Koji Takeda; Hiroo Takayama; Yoshifumi Naka; Maryjane A Farr; Renu Nandakumar; Anne-Catrin Uhlemann; Paolo C Colombo; Ryan T Demmer
Journal:  J Heart Lung Transplant       Date:  2020-02-13       Impact factor: 10.247

Review 3.  Left ventricular assist device-induced reverse remodeling: it's not just about myocardial recovery.

Authors:  Karolina K Marinescu; Nir Uriel; Douglas L Mann; Daniel Burkhoff
Journal:  Expert Rev Med Devices       Date:  2016-12-22       Impact factor: 3.166

4.  Association of pro-inflammatory cytokines and monocyte subtypes in older and younger patients on clinical outcomes after mechanical circulatory support device implantation.

Authors:  Joanna M Schaenman; Maura Rossetti; Tiffany Sidwell; Victoria Groysberg; Gemalene Sunga; Emily Liang; Sitaram Vangala; Eleanor Chang; Maral Bakir; Galyna Bondar; Martin Cadeiras; Murray Kwon; Elaine F Reed; Mario Deng
Journal:  Hum Immunol       Date:  2018-11-14       Impact factor: 2.850

5.  Delayed febrile response with bloodstream infections in patients with continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices.

Authors:  Christopher A Wrobel; Mark H Drazner; Colby R Ayers; David D Pham; Ricardo M La Hoz; Justin L Grodin; Sonia Garg; Pradeep P A Mammen; Robert M Morlend; Faris Araj; Alpesh A Amin; William K Cornwell; Jennifer T Thibodeau
Journal:  J Investig Med       Date:  2019-01-29       Impact factor: 2.895

6.  18F-FDG PET/CT-imaging of left ventricular assist device infection: a retrospective quantitative intrapatient analysis.

Authors:  Philipp Kanapinn; Wolfgang Burchert; Hermann Körperich; Jan Körfer
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2018-01-16       Impact factor: 5.952

7.  Phase 3 DREAM-HF Trial of Mesenchymal Precursor Cells in Chronic Heart Failure.

Authors:  Kenneth M Borow; Alex Yaroshinsky; Barry Greenberg; Emerson C Perin
Journal:  Circ Res       Date:  2019-07-18       Impact factor: 17.367

Review 8.  The Inflammatory Response to Ventricular Assist Devices.

Authors:  Gemma Radley; Ina Laura Pieper; Sabrina Ali; Farah Bhatti; Catherine A Thornton
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2018-11-15       Impact factor: 7.561

Review 9.  Biomarkers in Patients with Left Ventricular Assist Device: An Insight on Current Evidence.

Authors:  Carlotta Sciaccaluga; Nicolò Ghionzoli; Giulia Elena Mandoli; Flavio D'Ascenzi; Marta Focardi; Serafina Valente; Matteo Cameli
Journal:  Biomolecules       Date:  2022-02-19

10.  Left ventricular assist device bioinformatics identify possible hubgenes and regulatory networks involved in the myocardium of patients with left ventricular assist device.

Authors:  Maryam Ajmal; Aisha Ajmal; Maryam Rizvi; Umar Salim; Lei Huang
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2022-09-29
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.