Andrzej Bozek1, Beata Ignasiak2, Alicja Kasperska-Zajac3, Wojciech Scierski4, Alicja Grzanka3, Jerzy Jarzab3. 1. Clinical Department of Internal Disease, Dermatology, and Allergology in Zabrze, Medical University of Silesia, Katowice, Poland. Electronic address: andrzejbozek@o2.pl. 2. Outpatient Clinic of Allergy, Swietochlowice, Poland. 3. Clinical Department of Internal Disease, Dermatology, and Allergology in Zabrze, Medical University of Silesia, Katowice, Poland. 4. Clinical Department of Laryngology in Zabrze, Medical University of Silesia, Katowice, Poland.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Local allergic rhinitis (LAR) is characterized by the production of specific IgE in the nasal mucosa and a positive response to a nasal provocation test in the absence of atopy by conventional measurements. There is no information about LAR in elderly people, just as there is little information about allergic rhinitis (AR) in this age group. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the prevalence of LAR, AR, and non-AR in elderly patients with rhinitis. METHODS: In 219 patients with a mean (SD) age of 65.81 (5.88), skin prick tests, serum total specific IgE, and nasal provocation tests against common aeroallergens were performed. In addition, nasal specific IgE was measured in the nasal lavage at baseline and after provocation. For monitoring nasal symptoms, a visual analog scale was used. RESULTS: Of the 219 patients, 46 (21.0%) had LAR, 88 (40.2%) had AR, and 85 (38.8%) were diagnosed as having non-AR. Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus was the main sensitizing aeroallergen in patients with LAR (29 patients [63.0%]) and with AR (48 patients [56.4%]). No significant differences were found between the visual analog scale score and the type of AR (local or nonlocal) and the types of allergens. Clinical responses during the nasal provocation test were associated with significant increases in nasal IgE (Spearman correlation test, R = 0.89, P < .05). Polysensitization was more predominant in patients with AR than in those with LAR (P < .05). CONCLUSION: The results indicate that LAR and AR are common in elderly patients. However, in this age group, these conditions are often underdiagnosed.
BACKGROUND: Local allergic rhinitis (LAR) is characterized by the production of specific IgE in the nasal mucosa and a positive response to a nasal provocation test in the absence of atopy by conventional measurements. There is no information about LAR in elderly people, just as there is little information about allergic rhinitis (AR) in this age group. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the prevalence of LAR, AR, and non-AR in elderly patients with rhinitis. METHODS: In 219 patients with a mean (SD) age of 65.81 (5.88), skin prick tests, serum total specific IgE, and nasal provocation tests against common aeroallergens were performed. In addition, nasal specific IgE was measured in the nasal lavage at baseline and after provocation. For monitoring nasal symptoms, a visual analog scale was used. RESULTS: Of the 219 patients, 46 (21.0%) had LAR, 88 (40.2%) had AR, and 85 (38.8%) were diagnosed as having non-AR. Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus was the main sensitizing aeroallergen in patients with LAR (29 patients [63.0%]) and with AR (48 patients [56.4%]). No significant differences were found between the visual analog scale score and the type of AR (local or nonlocal) and the types of allergens. Clinical responses during the nasal provocation test were associated with significant increases in nasal IgE (Spearman correlation test, R = 0.89, P < .05). Polysensitization was more predominant in patients with AR than in those with LAR (P < .05). CONCLUSION: The results indicate that LAR and AR are common in elderly patients. However, in this age group, these conditions are often underdiagnosed.
Authors: Sarah K Wise; Sandra Y Lin; Elina Toskala; Richard R Orlandi; Cezmi A Akdis; Jeremiah A Alt; Antoine Azar; Fuad M Baroody; Claus Bachert; G Walter Canonica; Thomas Chacko; Cemal Cingi; Giorgio Ciprandi; Jacquelynne Corey; Linda S Cox; Peter Socrates Creticos; Adnan Custovic; Cecelia Damask; Adam DeConde; John M DelGaudio; Charles S Ebert; Jean Anderson Eloy; Carrie E Flanagan; Wytske J Fokkens; Christine Franzese; Jan Gosepath; Ashleigh Halderman; Robert G Hamilton; Hans Jürgen Hoffman; Jens M Hohlfeld; Steven M Houser; Peter H Hwang; Cristoforo Incorvaia; Deborah Jarvis; Ayesha N Khalid; Maritta Kilpeläinen; Todd T Kingdom; Helene Krouse; Desiree Larenas-Linnemann; Adrienne M Laury; Stella E Lee; Joshua M Levy; Amber U Luong; Bradley F Marple; Edward D McCoul; K Christopher McMains; Erik Melén; James W Mims; Gianna Moscato; Joaquim Mullol; Harold S Nelson; Monica Patadia; Ruby Pawankar; Oliver Pfaar; Michael P Platt; William Reisacher; Carmen Rondón; Luke Rudmik; Matthew Ryan; Joaquin Sastre; Rodney J Schlosser; Russell A Settipane; Hemant P Sharma; Aziz Sheikh; Timothy L Smith; Pongsakorn Tantilipikorn; Jody R Tversky; Maria C Veling; De Yun Wang; Marit Westman; Magnus Wickman; Mark Zacharek Journal: Int Forum Allergy Rhinol Date: 2018-02 Impact factor: 3.858
Authors: Carmen Rondón; Ibon Eguíluz-Gracia; Mohamed H Shamji; Janice A Layhadi; María Salas; María José Torres; Paloma Campo Journal: Curr Allergy Asthma Rep Date: 2018-10-13 Impact factor: 4.806