Literature DB >> 25744285

Validation of the Hindi version of the Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory-20 (MFI-20) in Indian cancer patients.

Priyanka Chandel1, Armiya Sultan, Khan Abraruzzaman Khan, Vivek Choudhary, Arti Parganiha.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The present study was designed to validate the Hindi version of the Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory-20 (MFI-20) in Indian oncology population.
METHODS: The original English version of the MFI-20 was translated into Hindi (hMFI-20) using the translation and back translation processes. The hMFI-20 was administered to 200 cancer patients. The item analysis for hMFI-20 was carried out using the corrected item-total correlation. The confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was employed to test whether the original factor structure of MFI-20 is confirmed for the hMFI-20. Further, convergent and discriminant validities were also tested. The reliability of the hMFI-20 was evaluated by computing composite reliability and Cronbach's α coefficient.
RESULTS: Corrected item-total correlation value for each of the items of hMFI-20 was greater than 0.6. Results of the CFA (comparative fit indices (CFI) = 0.91, root mean squared residual (RMR) = 0.04, root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA) = 0.028, and χ (2) = 45.68, p > 0.05) indicated that the five-factor model provided a good fit to the data. The findings indicated that hMFI-20 has a good convergent (composite reliability (CR) >0.7; average variance extracted value (AVE) >0.5) and discriminant (maximum shared variance (MSV) < AVE; average shared variance (ASV) < AVE; square root of AVE > inter-factor correlations) validities. The Cronbach's α coefficient for the total hMFI-20 was 0.8 and was more than 0.7 for each of the five factors.
CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that the hMFI-20 has a high internal consistency and reasonable construct validity. Therefore, the hMFI-20 is a reliable and valid tool to assess the multidimensional fatigue in Indian oncology population. However, we recommend further validation of hMFI-20 in population of cancer patients of different linguistic settings and regions of India.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25744285     DOI: 10.1007/s00520-015-2661-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Support Care Cancer        ISSN: 0941-4355            Impact factor:   3.603


  27 in total

1.  Fatigue patterns observed in patients receiving chemotherapy and radiotherapy.

Authors:  A L Schwartz; L M Nail; S Chen; P Meek; A M Barsevick; M E King; L S Jones
Journal:  Cancer Invest       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 2.176

2.  Validation of the Taiwanese version of the Brief Fatigue Inventory.

Authors:  Chia-Chin Lin; Ai-Ping Chang; Mei-Ling Chen; Charles S Cleeland; Tito R Mendoza; Xin Shelley Wang
Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 3.612

3.  Fatigue in patients receiving chemotherapy: patterns of change.

Authors:  A Richardson; E Ream; J Wilson-Barnett
Journal:  Cancer Nurs       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 2.592

4.  The Karnofsky Performance Status Scale. An examination of its reliability and validity in a research setting.

Authors:  V Mor; L Laliberte; J N Morris; M Wiemann
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1984-05-01       Impact factor: 6.860

5.  Assessing cancer-related fatigue: the psychometric properties of the Revised Piper Fatigue Scale in Italian cancer inpatients.

Authors:  Annalisa Giacalone; Jerry Polesel; Angela De Paoli; Anna Maria Colussi; Ivana Sartor; Renato Talamini; Umberto Tirelli
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2009-09-26       Impact factor: 3.603

6.  The relationship between cancer-related fatigue and patient satisfaction with quality of life in cancer.

Authors:  Digant Gupta; Christopher G Lis; James F Grutsch
Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage       Date:  2007-05-25       Impact factor: 3.612

7.  The Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory (MFI) psychometric qualities of an instrument to assess fatigue.

Authors:  E M Smets; B Garssen; B Bonke; J C De Haes
Journal:  J Psychosom Res       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 3.006

8.  Assessment of clinical relevant fatigue level in cancer.

Authors:  Yoon Jung Chang; Jung Suk Lee; Chang Geol Lee; Won Sup Lee; Keun Seok Lee; Soo-Mee Bang; Xin Shelley Wang; Tito R Mendoza; Charles S Cleeland; Young Ho Yun
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 3.359

9.  Distribution and determinants of patient satisfaction in oncology with a focus on health related quality of life.

Authors:  Christopher G Lis; Mark Rodeghier; James F Grutsch; Digant Gupta
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2009-10-21       Impact factor: 2.655

10.  Further validation of the Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory in a US adult population sample.

Authors:  Jin-Mann S Lin; Dana J Brimmer; Elizabeth M Maloney; Ernestina Nyarko; Rhonda Belue; William C Reeves
Journal:  Popul Health Metr       Date:  2009-12-15
View more
  5 in total

1.  Psychometric Properties of the Hindi Version of the Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder, and Hand: A Pilot Study.

Authors:  Saurabh P Mehta; Ramesh Tiruttani; Manraj N Kaur; Joy MacDermid; Rania Karim
Journal:  Rehabil Res Pract       Date:  2015-12-31

2.  The reliability and validity of The Turkish version of Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory-20 for the evaluation of different dimensions of fatigue in patients with fibromyalgia.

Authors:  Fatma Başoğlu; Julide Öncü; Banu Kuran; Hasan Kerem Alptekin
Journal:  Turk J Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2020-06-24

3.  Application of the Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory to Ethiopian Cancer Patients.

Authors:  Yemataw Wondie; Andreas Hinz
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2021-12-02

4.  Validity and reliability of the Traditional Chinese version of the Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory in general population.

Authors:  Li-Ling Chuang; Yu-Fen Chuang; Miao-Ju Hsu; Ying-Zu Huang; Alice M K Wong; Ya-Ju Chang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-05-10       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Fatigue in cancer patients: comparison with the general population and prognostic factors.

Authors:  Andreas Hinz; Joachim Weis; Elmar Brähler; Martin Härter; Kristina Geue; Jochen Ernst
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2020-01-17       Impact factor: 3.603

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.