OBJECTIVE: The present study was designed to validate the Hindi version of the Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory-20 (MFI-20) in Indian oncology population. METHODS: The original English version of the MFI-20 was translated into Hindi (hMFI-20) using the translation and back translation processes. The hMFI-20 was administered to 200 cancer patients. The item analysis for hMFI-20 was carried out using the corrected item-total correlation. The confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was employed to test whether the original factor structure of MFI-20 is confirmed for the hMFI-20. Further, convergent and discriminant validities were also tested. The reliability of the hMFI-20 was evaluated by computing composite reliability and Cronbach's α coefficient. RESULTS: Corrected item-total correlation value for each of the items of hMFI-20 was greater than 0.6. Results of the CFA (comparative fit indices (CFI) = 0.91, root mean squared residual (RMR) = 0.04, root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA) = 0.028, and χ (2) = 45.68, p > 0.05) indicated that the five-factor model provided a good fit to the data. The findings indicated that hMFI-20 has a good convergent (composite reliability (CR) >0.7; average variance extracted value (AVE) >0.5) and discriminant (maximum shared variance (MSV) < AVE; average shared variance (ASV) < AVE; square root of AVE > inter-factor correlations) validities. The Cronbach's α coefficient for the total hMFI-20 was 0.8 and was more than 0.7 for each of the five factors. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that the hMFI-20 has a high internal consistency and reasonable construct validity. Therefore, the hMFI-20 is a reliable and valid tool to assess the multidimensional fatigue in Indian oncology population. However, we recommend further validation of hMFI-20 in population of cancer patients of different linguistic settings and regions of India.
OBJECTIVE: The present study was designed to validate the Hindi version of the Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory-20 (MFI-20) in Indian oncology population. METHODS: The original English version of the MFI-20 was translated into Hindi (hMFI-20) using the translation and back translation processes. The hMFI-20 was administered to 200 cancerpatients. The item analysis for hMFI-20 was carried out using the corrected item-total correlation. The confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was employed to test whether the original factor structure of MFI-20 is confirmed for the hMFI-20. Further, convergent and discriminant validities were also tested. The reliability of the hMFI-20 was evaluated by computing composite reliability and Cronbach's α coefficient. RESULTS: Corrected item-total correlation value for each of the items of hMFI-20 was greater than 0.6. Results of the CFA (comparative fit indices (CFI) = 0.91, root mean squared residual (RMR) = 0.04, root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA) = 0.028, and χ (2) = 45.68, p > 0.05) indicated that the five-factor model provided a good fit to the data. The findings indicated that hMFI-20 has a good convergent (composite reliability (CR) >0.7; average variance extracted value (AVE) >0.5) and discriminant (maximum shared variance (MSV) < AVE; average shared variance (ASV) < AVE; square root of AVE > inter-factor correlations) validities. The Cronbach's α coefficient for the total hMFI-20 was 0.8 and was more than 0.7 for each of the five factors. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that the hMFI-20 has a high internal consistency and reasonable construct validity. Therefore, the hMFI-20 is a reliable and valid tool to assess the multidimensional fatigue in Indian oncology population. However, we recommend further validation of hMFI-20 in population of cancerpatients of different linguistic settings and regions of India.
Authors: Annalisa Giacalone; Jerry Polesel; Angela De Paoli; Anna Maria Colussi; Ivana Sartor; Renato Talamini; Umberto Tirelli Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2009-09-26 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Yoon Jung Chang; Jung Suk Lee; Chang Geol Lee; Won Sup Lee; Keun Seok Lee; Soo-Mee Bang; Xin Shelley Wang; Tito R Mendoza; Charles S Cleeland; Young Ho Yun Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2007-07 Impact factor: 3.359
Authors: Jin-Mann S Lin; Dana J Brimmer; Elizabeth M Maloney; Ernestina Nyarko; Rhonda Belue; William C Reeves Journal: Popul Health Metr Date: 2009-12-15
Authors: Andreas Hinz; Joachim Weis; Elmar Brähler; Martin Härter; Kristina Geue; Jochen Ernst Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2020-01-17 Impact factor: 3.603