Literature DB >> 25743456

Cost considerations in implementing a screening and surveillance strategy for Barrett's oesophagus.

John M Inadomi1.   

Abstract

There is increasing concern over the rising costs of healthcare leading to debate regarding the use of resources to implement preventive strategies. Oesophageal adenocarcinoma and its precursor, Barrett's oesophagus provides an excellent opportunity to highlight this issue since cancer is uncommon even among individuals with documented Barrett's oesophagus. This review provides a brief introduction to economic analysis in healthcare and summarizes published studies of the cost-effectiveness of strategies to reduce mortality from cancer. Current best estimates highlight the cost-effectiveness of endoscopic ablation among patients with Barrett's oesophagus and high-grade dysplasia and the low cost-effectiveness of ablation among patients without dysplasia. The cost-effectiveness of ablation among patients with Barrett's and low-grade dysplasia is poorly defined due to the ambiguity of diagnosing dysplasia, the unknown risk of cancer among patients with low-grade dysplasia, and the uncertain durability of ablation to maintain remission from metaplasia and dysplasia and prevent cancer.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Barrett oesophagus; Endoscopy; Mass screening; Oesophageal neoplasms

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25743456     DOI: 10.1016/j.bpg.2014.12.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol        ISSN: 1521-6918            Impact factor:   3.043


  7 in total

1.  Barrett's Esophagus With Low-Grade Dysplasia: Ablate or Wait?

Authors:  Sravanthi Parasa; Prateek Sharma
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2017-01-17       Impact factor: 10.864

Review 2.  Screening and Surveillance for Barrett's Esophagus: Is It Cost-Effective?

Authors:  John M Inadomi; Nina Saxena
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 3.199

Review 3.  Systematic Analysis and Critical Appraisal of the Quality of the Scientific Evidence and Conflicts of Interest in Practice Guidelines (2005-2013) for Barrett's Esophagus.

Authors:  Joseph D Feuerstein; Natalia E Castillo; Mona Akbari; Edward Belkin; Jeffrey J Lewandowski; Christine M Hurley; Samuel Lloyd; Daniel A Leffler; Adam S Cheifetz
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2016-06-15       Impact factor: 3.199

4.  Cancer incidence and mortality risks in a large US Barrett's oesophagus cohort.

Authors:  Michael B Cook; Sally B Coburn; Jameson R Lam; Philip R Taylor; Jennifer L Schneider; Douglas A Corley
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2017-01-04       Impact factor: 23.059

5.  Esophageal Acid Clearance During Random Swallowing Is Faster in Patients with Barrett's Esophagus Than in Healthy Controls.

Authors:  Christian Lottrup; Anne L Krarup; Hans Gregersen; Per Ejstrud; Asbjørn M Drewes
Journal:  J Neurogastroenterol Motil       Date:  2016-10-30       Impact factor: 4.924

Review 6.  Natural History of Barrett's Esophagus.

Authors:  Ernst J Kuipers; Manon C Spaander
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 3.199

Review 7.  Recent advances in understanding and preventing oesophageal cancer.

Authors:  James Franklin; Janusz Jankowski
Journal:  F1000Res       Date:  2020-04-21
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.