Literature DB >> 25743418

Efficacy of a novel prebiotic and a commercial probiotic in reducing mortality and production losses due to cold stress and Escherichia coli challenge of broiler chicks 1.

G R Huff1, W E Huff2, N C Rath2, F A El-Gohary3, Z Y Zhou4, S Shini5.   

Abstract

Prebiotics consisting of resistant starch may alter intestinal ecology, thus modulating inflammation and increasing intestinal health through increased cecal production of short-chain fatty acids (SCFA). Probiotics may directly alter the intestinal microbiome, resulting in the same effects. We hypothesize that adding prebiotics and probiotics to feed may protect the gut of young chicks under stress. Studies 1, 2, and 3 evaluated treatments in a cold stress (CS) and Escherichia coli (EC) oral challenge to 430 day-old broiler chicks for 3 wk. In study 1, prebiotics were administered as 15% of the diet during the first week only and consisted of the following: Hi-Maize resistant starch (HM), potato starch (PS), or raw potato (RP). In studies 2 and 3, the PS treatment was identical to study 1, and an additional probiotic treatment (PRO) was administered in feed and water. In study 1, PS protected BW during the first week and decreased the mortality of CS/EC-challenged birds during the first week and wk 3, while RP decreased the mortality of warm-brooded birds challenged with EC during the first week. In study 2, PS decreased and PRO increased the main effect mean (MEM) of the first week BW. PS and PRO numerically decreased the feed conversion ratio (FCR) by 23 and 29 points, respectively, in CS/EC-challenged birds with no effects on mortality. In study 3, PS decreased and PRO increased the first week and wk 3 MEM BW. PS numerically increased FCR by 16 points, while PRO decreased FCR by 2 points. Both PS and PRO tended to increase overall mortality, and PRO significantly increased mortality in the CS/EC challenge. These results suggest that the effects of PS may be too variable in this challenge model for further study; however, the PRO treatment improved production values and may have potential as an alternative to antibiotics during the first weeks after hatch.
© 2015 Poultry Science Association Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Escherichia coli; brooding; cold stress; prebiotic; probiotic

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25743418     DOI: 10.3382/ps/pev068

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Poult Sci        ISSN: 0032-5791            Impact factor:   3.352


  3 in total

Review 1.  Host and Environmental Factors Affecting the Intestinal Microbiota in Chickens.

Authors:  Jannigje G Kers; Francisca C Velkers; Egil A J Fischer; Gerben D A Hermes; J A Stegeman; Hauke Smidt
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2018-02-16       Impact factor: 5.640

2.  Probiotic Bacillus subtilis C-3102 Improves Eggshell Quality after Forced Molting in Aged Laying Hens.

Authors:  Toki Nishiyama; Koichi Nakagawa; Tomokazu Imabayashi; Shun Iwatani; Naoyuki Yamamoto; Nobumichi Tsushima
Journal:  J Poult Sci       Date:  2021-10-25       Impact factor: 1.425

3.  Isolation, characterization, and assessment of lactic acid bacteria toward their selection as poultry probiotics.

Authors:  Rine Christopher Reuben; Pravas Chandra Roy; Shovon Lal Sarkar; Rubayet-Ul Alam; Iqbal Kabir Jahid
Journal:  BMC Microbiol       Date:  2019-11-12       Impact factor: 3.605

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.