Johanna Louise Reichert1, Silvia Erika Kober2, Christa Neuper3, Guilherme Wood2. 1. Department of Psychology, University of Graz, Austria. Electronic address: johanna.reichert@uni-graz.at. 2. Department of Psychology, University of Graz, Austria; BioTechMed-Graz, Austria. 3. Department of Psychology, University of Graz, Austria; Laboratory of Brain-Computer Interfaces, Institute for Knowledge Discovery, Graz University of Technology, Austria; BioTechMed-Graz, Austria.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Instrumental conditioning of EEG activity (EEG-IC) is a promising method for improvement and rehabilitation of cognitive functions. However, it has been found that even healthy adults are not always able to learn how to regulate their brain activity during EEG-IC. In the present study, the role of a neurophysiological predictor of EEG-IC learning performance, the resting-state power of sensorimotor rhythm (rs-SMR, 12-15Hz), was investigated. METHODS: Eyes-open and eyes-closed rs-SMR power was assessed before N=28 healthy adults underwent 10 training sessions of instrumental SMR conditioning (ISC), in which participants should learn to voluntarily increase their SMR power by means of audio-visual feedback. A control group of N=19 participants received gamma (40-43Hz) or sham EEG-IC. RESULTS: N=19 of the ISC participants could be classified as "responders" as they were able to increase SMR power during training sessions, while N=9 participants ("non-responders") were not able to increase SMR power. Rs-SMR power in responders before start of ISC was higher in widespread parieto-occipital areas than in non-responders. A discriminant analysis indicated that eyes-open rs-SMR power in a central brain region specifically predicted later ISC performance, but not an increase of SMR in the control group. CONCLUSIONS: Together, these findings indicate that rs-SMR power is a specific and easy-to-measure predictor of later ISC learning performance. SIGNIFICANCE: The assessment of factors that influence the ability to regulate brain activity is of high relevance, as it could be used to avoid potentially frustrating and expensive EEG-IC training sessions for participants who have a low chance of success.
OBJECTIVE: Instrumental conditioning of EEG activity (EEG-IC) is a promising method for improvement and rehabilitation of cognitive functions. However, it has been found that even healthy adults are not always able to learn how to regulate their brain activity during EEG-IC. In the present study, the role of a neurophysiological predictor of EEG-IC learning performance, the resting-state power of sensorimotor rhythm (rs-SMR, 12-15Hz), was investigated. METHODS: Eyes-open and eyes-closed rs-SMR power was assessed before N=28 healthy adults underwent 10 training sessions of instrumental SMR conditioning (ISC), in which participants should learn to voluntarily increase their SMR power by means of audio-visual feedback. A control group of N=19 participants received gamma (40-43Hz) or sham EEG-IC. RESULTS: N=19 of the ISC participants could be classified as "responders" as they were able to increase SMR power during training sessions, while N=9 participants ("non-responders") were not able to increase SMR power. Rs-SMR power in responders before start of ISC was higher in widespread parieto-occipital areas than in non-responders. A discriminant analysis indicated that eyes-open rs-SMR power in a central brain region specifically predicted later ISC performance, but not an increase of SMR in the control group. CONCLUSIONS: Together, these findings indicate that rs-SMR power is a specific and easy-to-measure predictor of later ISC learning performance. SIGNIFICANCE: The assessment of factors that influence the ability to regulate brain activity is of high relevance, as it could be used to avoid potentially frustrating and expensive EEG-IC training sessions for participants who have a low chance of success.
Authors: Johanna L Reichert; Silvia E Kober; Daniela Schweiger; Peter Grieshofer; Christa Neuper; Guilherme Wood Journal: Front Hum Neurosci Date: 2016-07-15 Impact factor: 3.169
Authors: Jacek Rogala; Katarzyna Jurewicz; Katarzyna Paluch; Ewa Kublik; Ryszard Cetnarski; Andrzej Wróbel Journal: Front Hum Neurosci Date: 2016-06-17 Impact factor: 3.169