| Literature DB >> 25742757 |
Fulvia Ceccarelli1, Carlo Perricone2, Laura Massaro2, Enrica Cipriano2, Cristiano Alessandri2, Francesca Romana Spinelli2, Guido Valesini2, Fabrizio Conti2.
Abstract
The assessment of disease activity in patients affected by Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE) represents an important issue, as recommended by the European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR). Two main types of disease activity measure have been proposed: the global score systems, providing an overall measure of activity, and the individual organ/system assessment scales, assessing disease activity in different organs. All the activity indices included both clinical and laboratory items, related to the disease manifestations. However, there is no gold standard to measure disease activity in patients affected by SLE. In this review, we will analyze the lights and shadows of the disease activity indices, by means of a critical approach. In particular, we will focus on SLE Disease Activity Index (SLEDAI) and British Isles Lupus Assessment Group (BILAG), the most frequently used in randomized controlled trials and observational studies. The evaluation of data from the literature underlined some limitations of these indices, making their application in clinical practice difficult and suggesting the possible use of specific tools in the different subset of SLE patients, in order to capture all the disease features.Entities:
Keywords: BILAG; Disease activity; SLEDAI; Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
Mesh:
Year: 2015 PMID: 25742757 DOI: 10.1016/j.autrev.2015.02.008
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Autoimmun Rev ISSN: 1568-9972 Impact factor: 9.754