Literature DB >> 25742308

A randomized controlled trial comparing the ventilation duration between adaptive support ventilation and pressure assist/control ventilation in medical patients in the ICU.

Cenk Kirakli1, Ilknur Naz2, Ozlem Ediboglu2, Dursun Tatar2, Ahmet Budak2, Emel Tellioglu2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Adaptive support ventilation (ASV) is a closed loop mode of mechanical ventilation (MV) that provides a target minute ventilation by automatically adapting inspiratory pressure and respiratory rate with the minimum work of breathing on the part of the patient. The aim of this study was to determine the effect of ASV on total MV duration when compared with pressure assist/control ventilation.
METHODS: Adult medical patients intubated and mechanically ventilated for > 24 h in a medical ICU were randomized to either ASV or pressure assist/control ventilation. Sedation and medical treatment were standardized for each group. Primary outcome was the total MV duration. Secondary outcomes were the weaning duration, number of manual settings of the ventilator, and weaning success rates.
RESULTS: Two hundred twenty-nine patients were included. Median MV duration until weaning, weaning duration, and total MV duration were significantly shorter in the ASV group (67 [43-94] h vs 92 [61-165] h, P = .003; 2 [2-2] h vs 2 [2-80] h, P = .001; and 4 [2-6] days vs 4 [3-9] days, P = .016, respectively). Patients in the ASV group required fewer total number of manual settings on the ventilator to reach the desired pH and Paco2 levels (2 [1-2] vs 3 [2-5], P < .001). The number of patients extubated successfully on the first attempt was significantly higher in the ASV group (P = .001). Weaning success and mortality at day 28 were comparable between the two groups.
CONCLUSIONS: In medical patients in the ICU, ASV may shorten the duration of weaning and total MV duration with a fewer number of manual ventilator settings. TRIAL REGISTRY: ClinicalTrials.gov; No.: NCT01472302; URL: www.clinicaltrials.gov.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25742308     DOI: 10.1378/chest.14-2599

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chest        ISSN: 0012-3692            Impact factor:   9.410


  5 in total

1.  Automated control of mechanical ventilation during general anaesthesia: study protocol of a bicentric observational study (AVAS).

Authors:  Dirk Schädler; Georg Miestinger; Tobias Becher; Inéz Frerichs; Norbert Weiler; Christoph Hörmann
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-05-10       Impact factor: 2.692

2.  Comparison of adaptive support ventilation and synchronized intermittent mandatory ventilation in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome: A randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Babak Alikiaii; Saeed Abbasi; Hamideh Yari; Mojtaba Akbari; Parviz Kashefi
Journal:  J Res Med Sci       Date:  2022-01-29       Impact factor: 1.852

3.  Comparing the effects of adaptive support ventilation and synchronized intermittent mandatory ventilation on intubation duration and hospital stay after coronary artery bypass graft surgery.

Authors:  Ahmadreza Yazdannik; Hadi Zarei; Gholamreza Massoumi
Journal:  Iran J Nurs Midwifery Res       Date:  2016 Mar-Apr

4.  Comparing the Effect of Adaptive Support Ventilation (ASV) and Synchronized Intermittent Mandatory Ventilation (SIMV) on Respiratory Parameters in Neurosurgical ICU Patients.

Authors:  Mohammadreza Ghodrati; Alireza Pournajafian; Ali Khatibi; Mohammad Niakan; Mohammad Hosein Hemadi; Mohammad Mahdi Zamani
Journal:  Anesth Pain Med       Date:  2016-10-02

5.  Adaptive mechanical ventilation with automated minimization of mechanical power-a pilot randomized cross-over study.

Authors:  Tobias Becher; Anna Adelmeier; Inéz Frerichs; Norbert Weiler; Dirk Schädler
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2019-10-30       Impact factor: 9.097

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.