| Literature DB >> 25742270 |
Emeline Houël1, German Gonzalez2, Jean-Marie Bessière3, Guillaume Odonne4, Véronique Eparvier5, Eric Deharo2, Didier Stien5.
Abstract
This study examined whether the antidermatophytic activity of essential oils (EOs) can be used as an indicator for the discovery of active natural products against Leishmania amazonensis. The aerial parts of seven plants were hydrodistilled. Using broth microdilution techniques, the obtained EOs were tested against three strains of dermatophytes (Trichophyton mentagrophytes, Microsporum gypseum and Microsporum canis). To compare the EOs antifungal and antiparasitic effects, the EOs activities against axenic amastigotes of L. amazonensis were concurrently evaluated. For the most promising EOs, their antileishmanial activities against parasites infecting peritoneal macrophages of BALB/c mice were measured. The most interesting antifungal candidates were the EOs from Cymbopogon citratus, Otacanthus azureus and Protium heptaphyllum, whereas O. azureus, Piper hispidum and P. heptaphyllum EOs exhibited the lowest 50% inhibitory concentration (IC50) values against axenic amastigotes, thus revealing a certain correspondence between both activities. The P. hispidum EO was identified as the most promising product in the results from the infected macrophages model (IC50: 4.7 µg/mL, safety index: 8). The most abundant compounds found in this EO were sesquiterpenes, notably curzerene and furanodiene. Eventually, the evaluation of the antidermatophytic activity of EOs appears to be an efficient method for identifying new potential drugs for the treatment of L. amazonensis.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 25742270 PMCID: PMC4371224 DOI: 10.1590/0074-02760140332
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz ISSN: 0074-0276 Impact factor: 2.743
Minimum inhibitory concentrations (μg/mL), antileishmanial activity against axenic amastigotes [50% inhibitory concentration (IC50) (μg/mL)] and cytotoxicity [median toxic dose (TD50) (μg/mL), BALB/c mice peritoneal macrophages and VERO cells measured for the selected essential oils (EOs) and the reference antifungal (itraconazole and fluconazole) and antileishmanial (amphotericin B) drugs
| Dermatophytic filamentous fungi |
| Cytotoxicity | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EO |
|
|
| Antifungal activity (score) | IC50 axenic amastigotes | TD50 BALB/c mice peritoneal macrophages | TD50 VERO cells | SI | ||
|
| > 500 | > 500 | > 500 | 0 | 6.3 | 32.5 | 30.7 | 5 | ||
|
| 16 | 8 | 62 | 17 | 5.3 | 25.2 | 10.7 | 5 | ||
|
| 250 | 125 | > 500 | 5 | 6.8 | 50.8 | 93.2 | 7 | ||
|
| 16 | 8 | 125 | 16 | 0.7 | 35.5 | > 100 | 51 | ||
|
| 125 | 62 | 500 | 8 | 3.4 | 35.5 | > 100 | 11 | ||
|
| 62 | 31 | 62 | 13 | 3.7 | 71.2 | > 100 | 19 | ||
|
| 62 | 62 | 500 | 9 | 7.2 | 34.3 | 34.5 | 5 | ||
| Itraconazole | 0.5 | 0.5 | 4 | - | NT | NT | > 10 | NT | ||
| Fluconazole | 8 | 8 | NT | - | NT | NT | 283.2 | NT | ||
| Amphotericin B | NT | NT | NT | - | 0.3 | 3.7 | 1 | 12 | ||
a: antileishmanial selectivity index (SI) defined as SI = TD50 (BALB/c mice peritoneal macrophages)/IC50 (L. amazonensis axenic amastigotes); NT: not tested.
Antileishmanial activity [50% inhibitory concentration (IC50) (μg/mL)] against infected BALB/c mice peritoneal macrophages, safety index for BALB/c mice peritoneal macrophages and infection reduction index at the maximum concentration measured for the three most promising essential oils (EOs) and the reference antileishmanial drug (amphotericin B)
|
| |||
|---|---|---|---|
| EO | IC50 BALB/c mice infected peritoneal macrophages | Safety index on macrophages | Infection reduction index (%) (maximum concentration, µg/mL) |
|
| 16.1 | 2 | 64.7 (20) |
|
| 4.7 | 8 | 97.5 (20) |
|
| 34.9 | 2 | 59.6 (40) |
| Amphotericin B | 0.6 | 6 | (2) |
Main components (> 1 %) of the Piper hispidum essential oil identified by the gas chromatography-mass spectrometry analysis
| RI | Composition (%) | Compound |
| RI Adams (2007) | Houël et al. (2014) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 935 | 1 | α-pinene | 940 | 932 | 936 |
| 980 | 1.4 | β-pinene | 985 | 974 | 981 |
| 1379 | 1.2 | α-copaene | 1381 | 1374 | 1380 |
| 1391 | 2.6 | β-elemene | 1385 | 1389 | 1391 |
| 1423 | 4.7 | β-caryophyllene | 1427 | 1417 | 1424 |
| 1432 | 1.5 | γ-elemene | 1432 | 1434 | - |
| 1434 | 1.2 | β-copaene | - | 1430 | - |
| 1460 | 2.2 | α-humulene | 1462 | 1452 | 1461 |
| 1476 | 1.1 | selina-4,11-diene | 1482 | - | - |
| 1493 | 7.7 | β-selinene | 1496 | 1489 | - |
| 1497 | 15.7 | curzerene | - | 1499 | - |
| 1499 | 10.5 | α-selinene | 1496 | 1498 | 1499 |
| 1515 | 1.1 | γ-cadinene | 1518 | 1513 | - |
| 1519 | 3.4 | δ-cadinene | 1521 | 1522 | - |
| 1524 | 1.4 | calamenene (UI) | - | 1521/1528 | 1524 |
| 1561 | 10.9 | germacrene B | 1567 | 1559 | - |
| 1597 | 1.4 | viridiflorol | - | 1592 | 1599 |
| 1620 | 1.3 | 1,10-di- | - | 1613 | - |
| 1657 | 3.9 | 7- | - | 1662 | - |
| 1660 | 4.6 | junicedranone | - | 1664 | - |
| Total | 78.9 | - | - | - | - |
a: the identified constituents are listed in their order of elution from a non-polar column (Varian FactorFour VF-5ms); b: from curzerene and furanodiene. Quantitative data are affected by thermal rearrangement; c: Cicció and Chaverri (2008); RI: retention indices; UI: undetermined isomer.

Main components of the Piper hispidum essential oil identified by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry.