| Literature DB >> 25742265 |
Fernanda Fraga Campos1, Policarpo A Sales Junior2, Alvaro José Romanha2, Márcio S S Araújo2, Ezequias P Siqueira2, Jarbas M Resende3, Tânia M A Alves2, Olindo A Martins-Filho2, Vera Lúcia dos Santos4, Carlos A Rosa4, Carlos L Zani2, Betania Barros Cota2.
Abstract
Aiming to identify new sources of bioactive secondary metabolites, we isolated 82 endophytic fungi from stems and barks of the native Brazilian tree Caesalpinia echinata Lam. (Fabaceae). We tested their ethyl acetate extracts in several in vitro assays. The organic extracts from three isolates showed antibacterial activity against Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli [minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) 32-64 μg/mL]. One isolate inhibited the growth of Salmonella typhimurium (MIC 64 μg/mL) and two isolates inhibited the growth of Klebsiella oxytoca (MIC 64 μg/mL), Candida albicans and Candida tropicalis (MIC 64-128 μg/mL). Fourteen extracts at a concentration of 20 μg/mL showed antitumour activities against human breast cancer and human renal cancer cells, while two isolates showed anti-tumour activities against human melanoma cancer cells. Six extracts were able to reduce the proliferation of human peripheral blood mononuclear cells, indicating some degree of selective toxicity. Four isolates were able to inhibit Leishmania (Leishmania) amazonensis and one isolate inhibited Trypanosoma cruzi by at least 40% at 20 μg/mL. The trypanocidal extract obtained from Fusarium sp. [KF611679] culture was subjected to bioguided fractionation, which revealed beauvericin as the compound responsible for the observed toxicity of Fusarium sp. to T. cruzi. This depsipeptide showed a half maximal inhibitory concentration of 1.9 μg/mL (2.43 μM) in a T. cruzi cellular culture assay.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 25742265 PMCID: PMC4371219 DOI: 10.1590/0074-02760140243
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz ISSN: 0074-0276 Impact factor: 2.743
Table I Identification of endophytic fungi isolated from Caesalpinia echinata Lam. (Fabaceae) using primers internal transcribed spacer (ITS)1 and ITS4
| WC | Closest related species | Similarity(%) | Base pairs analysed(n) | Identification and GenBankaccessions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 25 |
| 100 | 523 |
|
| 45 |
| 100 | 461 |
|
| 46 |
| 100 | 509 |
|
| 9 |
| 100 | 357 |
|
| 58 |
| 99 | 481 |
|
| 2 |
| 100 | 495 |
|
| 6 |
| 100 | 360 |
|
| 33 |
| 100 | 509 |
|
| 24 |
| 100 | 566 |
|
| 1 |
| 99 | 497 |
|
| 11 |
| 96 | 515 |
|
| 41 |
| 100 | 411 |
|
| 55 |
| 100 | 473 |
|
| 84 |
| 99 | 516 |
|
WC: working code.
Table II Number of isolates from different plant parts
| Plant part | Samples(n) | Fungi isolated(n) | Morphotypes(n) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Barks | 10 | 34 | 14 |
| Stems | 13 | 48 | 10 |
| Total | - | 82 | - |
Table III In vitro antimicrobial activities of extracts from endophytic fungi of Caesalpinia echinata Lam. (Fabaceae)
| Fungal isolate (WC) | Microorganisms | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) (µg/mL) | ||||||||
| SA | EC | BC | ST | PA | KO | CA | CT | |
|
| 32 | 64 | > 256 | 64 | > 256 | 64 | > 256 | > 256 |
|
| 64 | 32 | > 256 | > 256 | > 256 | > 256 | > 256 | > 256 |
|
| > 256 | > 256 | > 256 | > 256 | > 256 | > 256 | > 256 | > 256 |
|
| > 256 | > 256 | > 256 | > 256 | > 256 | > 256 | 64 | 128 |
|
| > 256 | > 256 | > 256 | > 256 | > 256 | > 256 | > 256 | > 256 |
|
| > 256 | > 256 | > 256 | > 256 | > 256 | > 256 | > 256 | > 256 |
|
| > 256 | > 256 | > 256 | > 256 | > 256 | > 256 | > 256 | > 256 |
|
| 64 | > 256 | > 256 | > 256 | > 256 | > 256 | 128 | 128 |
|
| 32 | 64 | > 256 | > 256 | > 256 | 64 | > 256 | > 256 |
|
| > 256 | > 256 | > 256 | > 256 | > 256 | > 256 | > 256 | > 256 |
|
| > 256 | > 256 | > 256 | > 256 | > 256 | > 256 | > 256 | > 256 |
|
| > 256 | > 256 | > 256 | > 256 | > 256 | > 256 | > 256 | > 256 |
|
| > 256 | > 256 | > 256 | > 256 | > 256 | > 256 | > 256 | > 256 |
|
| 64 | > 256 | > 256 | > 256 | > 256 | > 256 | > 256 | > 256 |
| Controls | ||||||||
| Amphotericin B | NT | NT | NT | NT | NT | NT | 0.12 | 1.2 |
| Chloramphenicol | 16 | 8 | 16 | 16 | 8 | 8 | NT | NT |
BC: Bacillus cereus; CA: Candida albicans; CT: Candida tropicalis; EC: Escherichia coli; KO: Klebsiella oxytoca; NT: not tested; PA: Pseudomonas aeruginosa; SA: Staphylococcus aureus; ST: Salmonella typhimurium; WC: working code. Values in bold mean extracts with MIC values = 128 µg/mL.
Table IV In vitro antiprotozoan, cytotoxic and antiproliferative activities of extracts from endophytic fungi of Caesalpinia echinata Lam. (Fabaceae)
| Fungal isolate | Tumour cell lineages(%) | PBMC(%) | Protozoan(%) | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UACC-62 | TK-10 | MCF-7 | Mortality | Proliferation decreased | LA | TC | |||
|
| - | 103 ± 9 | - | - | - | - | - | ||
|
| 75 ± 7 | 47 ± 10 | 67 ± 9 | - | - | - | - | ||
|
| - | 97 ± 5 | 60 ± 17 | - | 15 ± 7 | - | - | ||
|
| - | 98 ± 5 | 88 ± 4 | - | 15 ± 8 | 45 ± 0 | 92 ± 4 | ||
|
| - | - | 48 ± 10 | 49 ± 26 | - | 45± 4 | - | ||
|
| - | 54 ± 14 | 68 ± 4 | NT | NT | - | - | ||
|
| - | 95 ± 7 | 93 ± 0 | NT | NT | - | - | ||
|
| 102 ± 7 | 96 ± 15 | 60 ± 11 | - | 37 ± 15 | 77 ± 3 | - | ||
|
| - | 95 ± 9 | 60 ± 7 | - | 20 ± 13 | - | - | ||
|
| - | 60 ± 1 | 57 ± 9 | - | - | - | - | ||
|
| - | 113 ± 3 | 47 ± 8 | NT | NT | 51 ± 1 | - | ||
|
| - | 43± 6 | - | - | 20 ± 15 | - | - | ||
|
| - | 92 ± 4 | 58 ± 0 | - | - | - | - | ||
|
| - | 51±9 | 48 ± 8 | NT | NT | - | - | ||
| Controls | |||||||||
| AMB | NT | NT | NT | NT | NT | 82 ± 3 | NT | ||
| BNZ | NT | NT | NT | NT | NT | NT | 86 ± 8 | ||
| ETO | 176 ± 9 | 185 ± 9 | 100 ± 5 | 33 ± 14 | NT | NT | NT | ||
| DEX | NT | NT | NT | 18 ± 13 | - | NT | NT | ||
| ALL | NT | NT | NT | - | 21 ± 14 | NT | NT | ||
all extracts were tested at 20 µg/mL. Results were expressed in terms of percentage of the inhibition. ALL: allopurinol tested at 20 µg/mL; AMB: amphotericin B tested at 0.02 µg/mL; BNZ: benznidazole tested at 1.0 µg/mL = 3.8 µM; DEX: dexamethasone tested at 20 µg/mL; ETO: etoposide tested at 1.6 µg/mL in tumour cell lineages and at 20 µg/mL in human peripheral blood mononuclear cell (PBMC); LA: amastigotes forms of Leishmania (Leishmania) amazonensis; MCF-7: human breast cancer; NT: not tested; TC: amastigote and trypomastigote forms of Trypanosoma cruzi; TK-10: human renal cancer; UACC-62: human melanoma cancer; WC: working code; -: inactive;
Fig. 1total-ion chromatogram (A) of beauvericin (B). Column RP-18, 150 mm × 2.1 mm i.d.; mobile phase [A: H2O; B: methanol) with 0.1% formic acid; 1%B-100%B in 13 min, 100%B in 4 min, 100%B-1%B in 0.5 min, 1%B in 11.5 min flow rate 200 µL/min-1. Electrospray ionisation-(+)-MS/MS of (B) (precursor m/z 784.4179 [M + H]+) and main fragments (C).
Fig. 2high performance liquid chromatographic coupled to an ultraviolet (UV) detector profile of ethyl acetate Fusarium sp. (working code 9). UV detection at 220 nm (A) and 254 nm (B). Column RP-18, 250 mm × 4.6 mm i.d.; mobile phase (A: H2O; B: acetonitrile) with 0.1% trifluoroacetic acid; 10%B-100%B in 30 min, 100%B in 10 min, flow rate of 1.0 mL/min. The ethyl acetate extract (5 mg/mL) and beauvericin (1,200 µg/mL).