BACKGROUND: Acute lung injury following trauma remains a significant source of morbidity and mortality. Although multiple trauma studies have used hypoxemia without radiographic adjudication as a surrogate for identifying adult respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) cases, the differences between patients with hypoxemia alone and those with radiographically confirmed ARDS are not well described in the literature. We hypothesized that nonhypoxemic, hypoxemic, and ARDS patients represent distinct groups with unique characteristics and predictors. METHODS: Laboratory, demographic, clinical, and outcomes data were prospectively collected from 621 intubated, critically injured patients at an urban Level 1 trauma center from 2005 to 2013. Hypoxemia was defined as PaO2/FIO2 ratio of 300 or lower. ARDS was adjudicated using Berlin criteria, with blinded two-physician consensus review of chest radiographs. Group comparisons were performed by hypoxemia and ARDS status. Logistic regression analyses were performed to separately assess predictors of hypoxemia and ARDS. RESULTS: Of the 621 intubated patients, 64% developed hypoxemia; 46% of these hypoxemic patients developed ARDS by chest radiograph. Across the three groups (no hypoxemia, hypoxemia, ARDS), there were no significant differences in age, sex, or comorbidities. However, there was an increase in severity of shock, injury, and chest injury by group, with corresponding trends in transfusion requirements and volume of early fluid administration. Outcomes followed a similar stepwise pattern, with pneumonia, multiorgan failure, length of intensive care unit stay, number of ventilator days, and overall mortality highest in ARDS patients. In multiple logistic regression, early plasma transfusion, delayed crystalloid administration, body mass index, and head and chest injury were independent predictors of hypoxemia, while head and chest injury, early crystalloid infusion, and delayed platelet transfusion were independent predictors of ARDS. CONCLUSION: Hypoxemia and ARDS exist on a spectrum of respiratory dysfunction following trauma, with increasing injury severity profiles and resuscitation requirements. However, they also represent distinct clinical states with unique predictors, which require directed research approaches and targeted therapeutic strategies. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic and epidemiologic study, level III.
BACKGROUND:Acute lung injury following trauma remains a significant source of morbidity and mortality. Although multiple trauma studies have used hypoxemia without radiographic adjudication as a surrogate for identifying adult respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) cases, the differences between patients with hypoxemia alone and those with radiographically confirmed ARDS are not well described in the literature. We hypothesized that nonhypoxemic, hypoxemic, and ARDS patients represent distinct groups with unique characteristics and predictors. METHODS: Laboratory, demographic, clinical, and outcomes data were prospectively collected from 621 intubated, critically injured patients at an urban Level 1 trauma center from 2005 to 2013. Hypoxemia was defined as PaO2/FIO2 ratio of 300 or lower. ARDS was adjudicated using Berlin criteria, with blinded two-physician consensus review of chest radiographs. Group comparisons were performed by hypoxemia and ARDS status. Logistic regression analyses were performed to separately assess predictors of hypoxemia and ARDS. RESULTS: Of the 621 intubated patients, 64% developed hypoxemia; 46% of these hypoxemic patients developed ARDS by chest radiograph. Across the three groups (no hypoxemia, hypoxemia, ARDS), there were no significant differences in age, sex, or comorbidities. However, there was an increase in severity of shock, injury, and chest injury by group, with corresponding trends in transfusion requirements and volume of early fluid administration. Outcomes followed a similar stepwise pattern, with pneumonia, multiorgan failure, length of intensive care unit stay, number of ventilator days, and overall mortality highest in ARDS patients. In multiple logistic regression, early plasma transfusion, delayed crystalloid administration, body mass index, and head and chest injury were independent predictors of hypoxemia, while head and chest injury, early crystalloid infusion, and delayed platelet transfusion were independent predictors of ARDS. CONCLUSION:Hypoxemia and ARDS exist on a spectrum of respiratory dysfunction following trauma, with increasing injury severity profiles and resuscitation requirements. However, they also represent distinct clinical states with unique predictors, which require directed research approaches and targeted therapeutic strategies. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic and epidemiologic study, level III.
Authors: Carolyn S Calfee; Michael A Matthay; Mark D Eisner; Neal Benowitz; Mariah Call; Jean-François Pittet; Mitchell J Cohen Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 2011-03-18 Impact factor: 21.405
Authors: Carolyn S Calfee; Diana Gallagher; Jason Abbott; B Taylor Thompson; Michael A Matthay Journal: Crit Care Med Date: 2012-06 Impact factor: 7.598
Authors: Michelle Ng Gong; B Taylor Thompson; Paige Williams; Lucille Pothier; Paul D Boyce; David C Christiani Journal: Crit Care Med Date: 2005-06 Impact factor: 7.598
Authors: Kenji Inaba; Bernardino C Branco; Peter Rhee; Lorne H Blackbourne; John B Holcomb; Pedro G R Teixeira; Ira Shulman; Janice Nelson; Demetrios Demetriades Journal: J Am Coll Surg Date: 2010-04-28 Impact factor: 6.113
Authors: Mark R Looney; John X Nguyen; Yongmei Hu; Jessica A Van Ziffle; Clifford A Lowell; Michael A Matthay Journal: J Clin Invest Date: 2009-10-05 Impact factor: 14.808
Authors: V Marco Ranieri; Gordon D Rubenfeld; B Taylor Thompson; Niall D Ferguson; Ellen Caldwell; Eddy Fan; Luigi Camporota; Arthur S Slutsky Journal: JAMA Date: 2012-06-20 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Elizabeth Y Killien; Brianna Mills; R Scott Watson; Monica S Vavilala; Frederick P Rivara Journal: Crit Care Med Date: 2018-12 Impact factor: 7.598
Authors: Lucy Z Kornblith; Anamaria J Robles; Amanda S Conroy; Brittney J Redick; Benjamin M Howard; Carolyn M Hendrickson; Sara Moore; Mary F Nelson; Farzad Moazed; Rachael A Callcut; Carolyn S Calfee; Mitchell Jay Cohen Journal: J Trauma Acute Care Surg Date: 2019-08 Impact factor: 3.313
Authors: Elizabeth Y Killien; Brianna Mills; Monica S Vavilala; R Scott Watson; Grant E OʼKeefe; Frederick P Rivara Journal: J Trauma Acute Care Surg Date: 2019-05 Impact factor: 3.313
Authors: Benjamin Michael Howard; Lucy Z Kornblith; Brittney J Redick; Amanda S Conroy; Mary F Nelson; Carolyn S Calfee; Rachael A Callcut; Mitchell Jay Cohen Journal: J Trauma Acute Care Surg Date: 2018-01 Impact factor: 3.313
Authors: Carolyn M Hendrickson; Sarah Dobbins; Brittney J Redick; Molly D Greenberg; Carolyn S Calfee; Mitchell Jay Cohen Journal: J Trauma Acute Care Surg Date: 2015-09 Impact factor: 3.313
Authors: Carolyn M Hendrickson; Benjamin M Howard; Lucy Z Kornblith; Amanda S Conroy; Mary F Nelson; Hanjing Zhuo; Kathleen D Liu; Geoffrey T Manley; Michael A Matthay; Carolyn S Calfee; Mitchell J Cohen Journal: J Trauma Acute Care Surg Date: 2016-06 Impact factor: 3.313
Authors: Christopher C Silliman; Marguerite R Kelher; Samina Y Khan; F Bernadette West; Nathan J D McLaughlin; David J Elzi; Kelly England; Jason Bjornsen; Susan A Kuldanek; Anirban Banerjee Journal: Transfusion Date: 2017-09-06 Impact factor: 3.157
Authors: Elizabeth Y Killien; Brianna Mills; R Scott Watson; Monica S Vavilala; Frederick P Rivara Journal: Crit Care Med Date: 2019-02 Impact factor: 7.598
Authors: Geoffrey R Nunns; John R Stringham; Fabia Gamboni; Ernest E Moore; Miguel Fragoso; Gregory R Stettler; Christopher C Silliman; Anirban Banerjee Journal: J Surg Res Date: 2018-05-05 Impact factor: 2.192
Authors: Rolf Rossaint; Bertil Bouillon; Vladimir Cerny; Timothy J Coats; Jacques Duranteau; Enrique Fernández-Mondéjar; Daniela Filipescu; Beverley J Hunt; Radko Komadina; Giuseppe Nardi; Edmund A M Neugebauer; Yves Ozier; Louis Riddez; Arthur Schultz; Jean-Louis Vincent; Donat R Spahn Journal: Crit Care Date: 2016-04-12 Impact factor: 9.097