Literature DB >> 25742207

MDDScore: confirmation of a blood test to aid in the diagnosis of major depressive disorder.

John A Bilello1, Linda M Thurmond, Katie M Smith, Bo Pi, Robert Rubin, Suzin M Wright, Floyd Taub, Michael E Henry, Richard C Shelton, George I Papakostas.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Previously, a biomarker panel was developed for use as an aid to major depressive disorder (MDD) diagnosis; it consisted of 9 biomarkers associated with the neurotrophic, metabolic, inflammatory, and hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis pathways. This panel and associated algorithm produced good clinical sensitivity and specificity (92% and 81%, respectively) in differentiating MDD patients from individuals without MDD. To further validate the panel, we performed a prospective study using a larger set of new prospectively acquired MDD patients and a similarly collected population of nondepressed subjects. The addition of gender and body mass index (BMI) effects to the algorithm was also evaluated.
METHOD: Blood samples were obtained from MDD patients (n = 68) clinically evaluated at multiple sites in 2011 and 2012 using standard psychiatric assessment tools and structured clinical interviews according to DSM-IV criteria. Blood samples (n = 86) from nondepressed subjects were obtained as controls. MDD and nondepressed samples were randomized into independent training (n = 102) and validation sets (n = 52). Analytes in sera were quantified by immunoassay.
RESULTS: Training set biomarker data were used to develop a logistic regression model that included gender and BMI in a manner that allowed for their interaction with the biochemical analytes. For the training set, the sensitivity and specificity of the test (with 95% CI) were 93% (0.80-0.98) and 95% (0.85-0.99), respectively. This method (designated the MDDScore) was then applied to the independent validation set and had a sensitivity and specificity of 96% (0.77-0.98) and 86% (0.66-0.95), respectively. The overall accuracy for the training set was 94%; the validation set accuracy was 91%.
CONCLUSION: Examination of a randomized independent set of samples confirms the ability of the previously established biomarker panel to identify persons with MDD; the accuracy was over 90%. The improved model that adds gender and BMI to the previously established panel of 9 biomarkers is robust and simple; it provides the most rigorously tested, objective diagnostic test for MDD to date. © Copyright 2015 Physicians Postgraduate Press, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25742207     DOI: 10.4088/JCP.14m09029

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Psychiatry        ISSN: 0160-6689            Impact factor:   4.384


  15 in total

Review 1.  Depression and coronary heart disease.

Authors:  Robert M Carney; Kenneth E Freedland
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2016-11-17       Impact factor: 32.419

2.  The Combination of Serum BDNF, Cortisol and IFN-Gamma Can Assist the Diagnosis of Major Depressive Disorder.

Authors:  Suzhen Chen; Yuqun Zhang; Yonggui Yuan
Journal:  Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat       Date:  2021-08-26       Impact factor: 2.570

3.  Sex Differences in Serum Markers of Major Depressive Disorder in the Netherlands Study of Depression and Anxiety (NESDA).

Authors:  Jordan M Ramsey; Jason D Cooper; Mariska Bot; Paul C Guest; Femke Lamers; Cynthia S Weickert; Brenda W J H Penninx; Sabine Bahn
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-05-27       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 4.  Biological and Clinical Implications of Comorbidities in Parkinson's Disease.

Authors:  Jose A Santiago; Virginie Bottero; Judith A Potashkin
Journal:  Front Aging Neurosci       Date:  2017-12-04       Impact factor: 5.750

5.  Serum proteins mediate depression's association with dementia.

Authors:  Donald R Royall; Safa Al-Rubaye; Ram Bishnoi; Raymond F Palmer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-06-08       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Gene expression-based biological test for major depressive disorder: an advanced study.

Authors:  Shin-Ya Watanabe; Shusuke Numata; Jun-Ichi Iga; Makoto Kinoshita; Hidehiro Umehara; Kazuo Ishii; Tetsuro Ohmori
Journal:  Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat       Date:  2017-02-21       Impact factor: 2.570

7.  Integrative transcriptomic meta-analysis of Parkinson's disease and depression identifies NAMPT as a potential blood biomarker for de novo Parkinson's disease.

Authors:  Jose A Santiago; Alyssa M Littlefield; Judith A Potashkin
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-09-29       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Multivariate techniques enable a biochemical classification of children with autism spectrum disorder versus typically-developing peers: A comparison and validation study.

Authors:  Daniel P Howsmon; Troy Vargason; Robert A Rubin; Leanna Delhey; Marie Tippett; Shannon Rose; Sirish C Bennuri; John C Slattery; Stepan Melnyk; S Jill James; Richard E Frye; Juergen Hahn
Journal:  Bioeng Transl Med       Date:  2018-06-19

Review 9.  Is there Progress? An Overview of Selecting Biomarker Candidates for Major Depressive Disorder.

Authors:  Juan Joseph Young; Tim Silber; Davide Bruno; Isaac Robert Galatzer-Levy; Nunzio Pomara; Charles Raymond Marmar
Journal:  Front Psychiatry       Date:  2016-04-25       Impact factor: 4.157

10.  Combined serum levels of multiple proteins in tPA-BDNF pathway may aid the diagnosis of five mental disorders.

Authors:  Suzhen Chen; Haitang Jiang; Yang Liu; Zhenhua Hou; Yingying Yue; Yuqun Zhang; Fuying Zhao; Zhi Xu; Yinghui Li; Xiaodong Mou; Lei Li; Tianyu Wang; Jingjing Zhao; Chongyang Han; Yuxiu Sui; Ming Wang; Zhong Yang; Yan Lu; Yifeng Zhu; Jianhua Li; Xinhua Shen; Fei Sun; Qingsong Chen; Huanxin Chen; Yonggui Yuan
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-07-31       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.