Literature DB >> 25741746

Methods to test visual attention online.

Amanda Yung1, Pedro Cardoso-Leite2, Gillian Dale3, Daphne Bavelier4, C Shawn Green3.   

Abstract

Online data collection methods have particular appeal to behavioral scientists because they offer the promise of much larger and much more representative data samples than can typically be collected on college campuses. However, before such methods can be widely adopted, a number of technological challenges must be overcome--in particular in experiments where tight control over stimulus properties is necessary. Here we present methods for collecting performance data on two tests of visual attention. Both tests require control over the visual angle of the stimuli (which in turn requires knowledge of the viewing distance, monitor size, screen resolution, etc.) and the timing of the stimuli (as the tests involve either briefly flashed stimuli or stimuli that move at specific rates). Data collected on these tests from over 1,700 online participants were consistent with data collected in laboratory-based versions of the exact same tests. These results suggest that with proper care, timing/stimulus size dependent tasks can be deployed in web-based settings.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25741746      PMCID: PMC4354665          DOI: 10.3791/52470

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vis Exp        ISSN: 1940-087X            Impact factor:   1.355


  10 in total

1.  Enumeration versus multiple object tracking: the case of action video game players.

Authors:  C S Green; D Bavelier
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2005-12-15

2.  Conducting behavioral research on Amazon's Mechanical Turk.

Authors:  Winter Mason; Siddharth Suri
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2012-03

3.  Tracking multiple independent targets: evidence for a parallel tracking mechanism.

Authors:  Z W Pylyshyn; R W Storm
Journal:  Spat Vis       Date:  1988

Review 4.  The useful field of view test: a new technique for evaluating age-related declines in visual function.

Authors:  K Ball; C Owsley
Journal:  J Am Optom Assoc       Date:  1993-01

5.  The difficulties of executing simple algorithms: why brains make mistakes computers don't.

Authors:  Gary Lupyan
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2013-12

6.  The weirdest people in the world?

Authors:  Joseph Henrich; Steven J Heine; Ara Norenzayan
Journal:  Behav Brain Sci       Date:  2010-06-15       Impact factor: 12.579

7.  Amazon's Mechanical Turk: A New Source of Inexpensive, Yet High-Quality, Data?

Authors:  Michael Buhrmester; Tracy Kwang; Samuel D Gosling
Journal:  Perspect Psychol Sci       Date:  2011-02-03

8.  Differential development of visual attention skills in school-age children.

Authors:  Matthew W G Dye; Daphne Bavelier
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2009-10-30       Impact factor: 1.886

9.  Temporal properties of liquid crystal displays: implications for vision science experiments.

Authors:  Tobias Elze; Thomas G Tanner
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-09-11       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Evaluating Amazon's Mechanical Turk as a tool for experimental behavioral research.

Authors:  Matthew J C Crump; John V McDonnell; Todd M Gureckis
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-03-13       Impact factor: 3.240

  10 in total
  2 in total

1.  Action video game play facilitates "learning to learn".

Authors:  Ru-Yuan Zhang; Adrien Chopin; Kengo Shibata; Zhong-Lin Lu; Susanne M Jaeggi; Martin Buschkuehl; C Shawn Green; Daphne Bavelier
Journal:  Commun Biol       Date:  2021-10-14

2.  Conducting perception research over the internet: a tutorial review.

Authors:  Andy T Woods; Carlos Velasco; Carmel A Levitan; Xiaoang Wan; Charles Spence
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2015-07-23       Impact factor: 2.984

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.