Kristin M Khalaf1, Karin S Coyne1, Denise R Globe1, Edward P Armstrong1, Daniel C Malone1, Jack Burks1. 1. Allergan, Inc, Irvine, CA, USA (KMK, DRG); Evidera, Bethesda, MD, USA (KSC); University of Arizona College of Pharmacy, Tucson, AZ, USA (KMK, EPA, DCM); and Florida International University, Miami, FL, USA (JB). Dr. Khalaf is now with Xcenda, Palm Harbor, FL, USA. Dr. Globe is now with Novartis Pharmaceuticals, East Hanover, NJ, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: This study was conducted to assess self-reported prevalence and management of lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS), along with drivers of treatment seeking, among patients with multiple sclerosis (MS). METHODS: An online, cross-sectional survey was administered to US-residing participants with self-reported MS to assess presence of LUTS, including urinary incontinence (UI). Participants experiencing LUTS were asked additional questions related to management and current therapies. Multivariate logistic regression identified drivers of treatment-seeking behavior. RESULTS: A total of 1052 participants completed the survey; 1047 were included in the analysis. Nine hundred sixty-six participants (92%) reported at least one LUTS, the most common being post-micturition dribble (64.9%), urinary urgency (61.7%), and a feeling of incomplete emptying (60.7%). Eight hundred twenty-six (79%) reported having some type of UI. Of those with any type of LUTS, 70% (n = 680) had previously discussed urinary symptoms with a health-care provider (HCP), while only 32% (n = 311) had seen an HCP in the past year. Logistic regression found urgency (odds ratio [OR] 1.20 [95% confidence interval (CI), 1.00-1.44]), intermittent urine stream (OR 1.40 [95% CI, 1.15-1.69]), and urgency UI (OR 1.78 [95% CI, 1.22-2.60]) to be significant predictors of seeking treatment. Of those who had discussed LUTS with an HCP, 480 (70.6%) were currently receiving at least one LUTS treatment; the most common treatments were reducing fluid intake, pelvic exercises, oral anticholinergic medications, and avoiding certain foods/alcohol. CONCLUSIONS: LUTS are commonly experienced among people with MS but are largely untreated. Proper LUTS assessment and work-up is warranted in MS patients.
BACKGROUND: This study was conducted to assess self-reported prevalence and management of lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS), along with drivers of treatment seeking, among patients with multiple sclerosis (MS). METHODS: An online, cross-sectional survey was administered to US-residing participants with self-reported MS to assess presence of LUTS, including urinary incontinence (UI). Participants experiencing LUTS were asked additional questions related to management and current therapies. Multivariate logistic regression identified drivers of treatment-seeking behavior. RESULTS: A total of 1052 participants completed the survey; 1047 were included in the analysis. Nine hundred sixty-six participants (92%) reported at least one LUTS, the most common being post-micturition dribble (64.9%), urinary urgency (61.7%), and a feeling of incomplete emptying (60.7%). Eight hundred twenty-six (79%) reported having some type of UI. Of those with any type of LUTS, 70% (n = 680) had previously discussed urinary symptoms with a health-care provider (HCP), while only 32% (n = 311) had seen an HCP in the past year. Logistic regression found urgency (odds ratio [OR] 1.20 [95% confidence interval (CI), 1.00-1.44]), intermittent urine stream (OR 1.40 [95% CI, 1.15-1.69]), and urgency UI (OR 1.78 [95% CI, 1.22-2.60]) to be significant predictors of seeking treatment. Of those who had discussed LUTS with an HCP, 480 (70.6%) were currently receiving at least one LUTS treatment; the most common treatments were reducing fluid intake, pelvic exercises, oral anticholinergic medications, and avoiding certain foods/alcohol. CONCLUSIONS: LUTS are commonly experienced among people with MS but are largely untreated. Proper LUTS assessment and work-up is warranted in MSpatients.
Authors: Paul Abrams; Linda Cardozo; Magnus Fall; Derek Griffiths; Peter Rosier; Ulf Ulmsten; Philip van Kerrebroeck; Arne Victor; Alan Wein Journal: Neurourol Urodyn Date: 2002 Impact factor: 2.696
Authors: Vernon F Schabert; Tamara Bavendam; Erica L Goldberg; Jeffrey N Trocio; Linda Brubaker Journal: Am J Manag Care Date: 2009-03 Impact factor: 2.229
Authors: L D Jacobs; D L Cookfair; R A Rudick; R M Herndon; J R Richert; A M Salazar; J S Fischer; D E Goodkin; C V Granger; J H Simon; J J Alam; D M Bartoszak; D N Bourdette; J Braiman; C M Brownscheidle; M E Coats; S L Cohan; D S Dougherty; R P Kinkel; M K Mass; F E Munschauer; R L Priore; P M Pullicino; B J Scherokman; R H Whitham Journal: Ann Neurol Date: 1996-03 Impact factor: 10.422
Authors: Benoit Peyronnet; Lauren B Krupp; W Stuart Reynolds; Xavier Gamé; Gérard Amarenco; Jean-Nicolas Cornu; Lana Zhovtis Ryerson; Carrie Lyn Sammarco; Jonathan E Howard; Robert W Charlson; Roger R Dmochowski; Benjamin M Brucker Journal: Rev Urol Date: 2019
Authors: Mark Tullman; Emmanuel Chartier-Kastler; Alfred Kohan; Veronique Keppenne; Benjamin M Brucker; Blair Egerdie; Meryl Mandle; Jean Paul Nicandro; Brenda Jenkins; Pierre Denys Journal: Neurology Date: 2018-07-20 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: Giulia I Lane; Yang Mao-Draayer; Paholo Barboglio-Romo; J Quentin Clemens; Priyanka Gupta; Rod Dunn; Yongmei Qin; Anne P Cameron; John T Stoffel Journal: BMC Urol Date: 2020-05-27 Impact factor: 2.264