| Literature DB >> 25741219 |
Huae Xu1, Xiaolin Li2, Wenqiu Ding3, Xiaoning Zeng3, Hui Kong3, Hong Wang3, Weiping Xie3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Duguelin is a rotenoid extracted from plants and has potent antitumor effects in vitro and in vivo. However, the mechanism underlying the antitumor effect remains unclear. Our preliminary study showed that Deguelin is effective to stimulate the generation of Reactive Oxygen Species (ROS). In the current study, we evaluated the in vitro cytotoxicity of Deguelin against lung cancer cells and studied whether a ROS scavenger, N-acetyl-cysteine (NAC), can reverse the inhibitory effect of Deguelin.Entities:
Keywords: Akt; Apoptosis; Deguelin; Lung cancer; ROS
Year: 2015 PMID: 25741219 PMCID: PMC4349657 DOI: 10.1186/s12935-015-0166-4
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Cancer Cell Int ISSN: 1475-2867 Impact factor: 5.722
Figure 1Intracellular ROS induction and in vitro cytotoxicity of Deguelin. A: Quantitative intracellular DCF fluorescence intensity of NCI-1975 cells induced by Deguelin with or without the presence of NAC. # represents p < 0.05 vs the corresponding dose between cells without and with the treatment of NAC. ** represents p < 0.01 vs the control cells. Data are presented as mean ± SD (n = 3). B: Cell cytotoxicity test of Deguelin with or without the presence of NAC in NCI-1975 cells after 24 h incubation. # represents p < 0.05 vs the corresponding dose between cells without and with the treatment of NAC. * represents p < 0.05 vs the control cells. Data are represented as Mean ± SD (n = 3).
Figure 2Influence of Deguelin on the cell proliferation. A: Hoechest and Edu dual staining of NCI-1975 cells under the treatment of a series of Deguelin with or without the presence of NAC. A: Image of dual staining of cells treated by Deguelin only. B: Image of dual staining of cells treated by Deguelin with the presence of NAC (500 μM). C: Quantification of proliferative cells under the treatment of Deguelin with or without the presence of NAC. # represents p < 0.05 vs the corresponding dose between cells without and with the treatment of NAC. ** represents p < 0.01 vs the control cells. Data are presented as mean ± SD (n = 3).
Figure 3Apoptosis induced by Deguelin. A: Apoptosis rates induced by Deguelin with or without the co-treatment of NAC by FACS. B: Quantification of apoptotic cells induced by Deguelin with or without the co-treatment of NAC. # represents p < 0.05 vs the corresponding dose between cells without and with the treatment of NAC. ** represents p < 0.01 vs the control cells. Data are presented as mean ± SD (n = 3).
Figure 4Relative protein expression under the treatment of Deguelin. A: Gel image of Western blot analysis showing the related protein expression in NCI-1975 cells exposed to Deguelin (5 and 20 μM) with or without the presence of NAC. B: Bar graph representing the semi-quantification of gel image (p-Akt/Akt) normalizing the band with the GAPDH control. # represents p < 0.05 vs the corresponding dose between cells without and with the treatment of NAC. ** represents p < 0.01 vs the control cells. Data are presented as mean ± SD (n = 3). C: Bar graph representing the semi-quantification of gel image (p-GSK3β/GSK3β) normalizing the band with the GAPDH control. # represents p < 0.05 vs the corresponding dose between cells without and with the treatment of NAC. ** represents p < 0.01 vs the control cells. Data are presented as mean ± SD (n = 3). D: Bar graph representing the semi-quantification of gel image (Caspase-3) normalizing the band with the GAPDH control. # represents p < 0.05 vs the corresponding dose between cells without and with the treatment of NAC. ** represents p < 0.01 vs the control cells. Data are presented as mean ± SD (n = 3).