Annemieke Van Haver1, Karel De Roo2, Matthieu De Beule3, Luc Labey4, Patrick De Baets5, David Dejour6, Tom Claessens7, Peter Verdonk8. 1. Department of Industrial Technology and Construction, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium Department of Construction and Production, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium Monica Orthopaedic Research (MORE) Institute, Antwerp, Belgium mvhaver@hotmail.com. 2. Department of Physical medicine and orthopaedic surgery, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium. 3. Department of Civil Engineering, IBiTech-bioMMeda, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium. 4. Department of Mechanical Engineering-Division of Biomechanics, Catholic University Leuven, Leuven, Belgium. 5. Department of Construction and Production, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium. 6. Department of Orthopaedics, Lyon-Ortho-Clinic, Clinique de la Sauvegarde, Lyon, France. 7. Department of Industrial Technology and Construction, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium. 8. Department of Physical medicine and orthopaedic surgery, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium Antwerp Orthopedic Center, Monica Hospitals, Antwerp, Belgium.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Trochlear dysplasia appears in different geometrical variations. The Dejour classification is widely used to grade the severity of trochlear dysplasia and to decide on treatment. PURPOSE: To investigate the effect of trochlear dysplasia on patellofemoral biomechanics and to determine if different types of trochlear dysplasia have different effects on patellofemoral biomechanics. STUDY DESIGN: Controlled laboratory study. METHODS: Trochlear dysplasia was simulated in 4 cadaveric knees by replacing the native cadaveric trochlea with different types of custom-made trochlear implants, manufactured with 3-dimensional printing. For each knee, 5 trochlear implants were designed: 1 implant simulated the native trochlea (control condition), and 4 implants simulated 4 types of trochlear dysplasia. The knees were subjected to 3 biomechanical tests: a squat simulation, an open chain extension simulation, and a patellar stability test. The patellofemoral kinematics, contact area, contact pressure, and stability were compared between the control condition (replica implants) and the trochlear dysplastic condition and among the subgroups of trochlear dysplasia. RESULTS: The patellofemoral joint in the trochlear dysplastic group showed increased internal rotation, lateral tilt, and lateral translation; increased contact pressures; decreased contact areas; and decreased stability when compared with the control group. Within the trochlear dysplastic group, the implants graded as Dejour type D showed the largest deviations for the kinematical parameters, and the implants graded as Dejour types B and D showed the largest deviations for the patellofemoral contact areas and pressures. CONCLUSION: Patellofemoral kinematics, contact area, contact pressure, and stability are significantly affected by trochlear dysplasia. Of all types of trochlear dysplasia, the models characterized with a pronounced trochlear bump showed the largest deviations in patellofemoral biomechanics. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Investigating the relationship between the shape of the trochlea and patellofemoral biomechanics can provide insight into the short-term effects (maltracking, increased pressures, and instability) and long-term effects (osteoarthritis) of different types of trochlear dysplasia. Furthermore, this investigation provides an empirical explanation for better treatment outcomes of trochleoplasty for Dejour types B and D dysplasia.
BACKGROUND:Trochlear dysplasia appears in different geometrical variations. The Dejour classification is widely used to grade the severity of trochlear dysplasia and to decide on treatment. PURPOSE: To investigate the effect of trochlear dysplasia on patellofemoral biomechanics and to determine if different types of trochlear dysplasia have different effects on patellofemoral biomechanics. STUDY DESIGN: Controlled laboratory study. METHODS:Trochlear dysplasia was simulated in 4 cadaveric knees by replacing the native cadaveric trochlea with different types of custom-made trochlear implants, manufactured with 3-dimensional printing. For each knee, 5 trochlear implants were designed: 1 implant simulated the native trochlea (control condition), and 4 implants simulated 4 types of trochlear dysplasia. The knees were subjected to 3 biomechanical tests: a squat simulation, an open chain extension simulation, and a patellar stability test. The patellofemoral kinematics, contact area, contact pressure, and stability were compared between the control condition (replica implants) and the trochlear dysplastic condition and among the subgroups of trochlear dysplasia. RESULTS: The patellofemoral joint in the trochlear dysplastic group showed increased internal rotation, lateral tilt, and lateral translation; increased contact pressures; decreased contact areas; and decreased stability when compared with the control group. Within the trochlear dysplastic group, the implants graded as Dejour type D showed the largest deviations for the kinematical parameters, and the implants graded as Dejour types B and D showed the largest deviations for the patellofemoral contact areas and pressures. CONCLUSION: Patellofemoral kinematics, contact area, contact pressure, and stability are significantly affected by trochlear dysplasia. Of all types of trochlear dysplasia, the models characterized with a pronounced trochlear bump showed the largest deviations in patellofemoral biomechanics. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Investigating the relationship between the shape of the trochlea and patellofemoral biomechanics can provide insight into the short-term effects (maltracking, increased pressures, and instability) and long-term effects (osteoarthritis) of different types of trochlear dysplasia. Furthermore, this investigation provides an empirical explanation for better treatment outcomes of trochleoplasty for Dejour types B and D dysplasia.
Authors: P Kaiser; F Loth; R Attal; M Kummann; P Schuster; F Riechelmann; M Schlumberger Journal: Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc Date: 2019-07-02 Impact factor: 4.342
Authors: Mo Saffarini; Jacobus H Müller; Giuseppe La Barbera; Gerjon Hannink; Kyung Jin Cho; Cécile Toanen; David Dejour Journal: Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc Date: 2017-03-07 Impact factor: 4.342
Authors: Riccardo G Gobbi; Marco K Demange; Luiz Francisco Rodrigues de Ávila; José de Arimatéia Batista Araújo Filho; Ramon Alfredo Moreno; Marco Antônio Gutierrez; Marina de Sá Rebelo; Luis Eduardo Passarelli Tírico; José Ricardo Pécora; Gilberto Luis Camanho Journal: Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc Date: 2016-08-20 Impact factor: 4.342
Authors: Peter Balcarek; Stephan Rehn; Nick R Howells; Jonathan D Eldridge; Keisuke Kita; David Dejour; Manfred Nelitz; Ingo J Banke; Delphine Lambrecht; Markus Harden; Tim Friede Journal: Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc Date: 2016-10-27 Impact factor: 4.342
Authors: Elizabeth A Arendt; Massimo Berruto; Giuseppe Filardo; Mario Ronga; Stefano Zaffagnini; Jack Farr; Paolo Ferrua; Alberto Grassi; Vincenzo Condello Journal: Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc Date: 2016-04-27 Impact factor: 4.342