PURPOSE: The purpose of this single-group pilot study was to evaluate the feasibility, acceptability, and initial outcomes of a novel approach to delivering weight loss treatment in primary care using peer coaches and targeting predominantly African American patients with diabetes or prediabetes. METHODS: Participants (N = 33) were recruited from a family medicine practice for a 6-month lifestyle intervention. Eligible patients were obese adults (body mass index [BMI] ≥30 kg/m(2)) with ≥1 additional cardiometabolic risk factor(s), including (1) elevated hemoglobin A1C or diagnosed diabetes, (2) elevated blood pressure, (3) elevated triglycerides, and/or (4) low high-density lipoprotein. The intervention included a combination of 12 group-based office visits with health professionals plus 12 individual phone contacts with peer coaches. Outcomes included weight loss, program adherence, and program satisfaction. RESULTS: Participants (mean age = 56 ± 10 years; BMI = 42.9 ± 11.0 kg/m(2)) were predominantly female (88%) and African American (85%). Treatment resulted in a significant mean weight loss of -4.5 ± 7.2 kg, and approximately 27% of participants lost ≥5% of their initial body weight. Participants completed approximately 50% of the group visits and 40% of the telephone calls with peer coaches. Participants rated both components of the intervention favorably. CONCLUSIONS: Results of this pilot study indicated that a primary care weight management program including group-based visits and peer-delivered telephone contacts achieved significant weight loss among predominantly African American patients with weight-related comorbidities, including diabetes and prediabetes. Additional research is needed to examine the long-term outcomes of this novel approach and to identify program components supporting patients' success.
PURPOSE: The purpose of this single-group pilot study was to evaluate the feasibility, acceptability, and initial outcomes of a novel approach to delivering weight loss treatment in primary care using peer coaches and targeting predominantly African American patients with diabetes or prediabetes. METHODS:Participants (N = 33) were recruited from a family medicine practice for a 6-month lifestyle intervention. Eligible patients were obese adults (body mass index [BMI] ≥30 kg/m(2)) with ≥1 additional cardiometabolic risk factor(s), including (1) elevated hemoglobin A1C or diagnosed diabetes, (2) elevated blood pressure, (3) elevated triglycerides, and/or (4) low high-density lipoprotein. The intervention included a combination of 12 group-based office visits with health professionals plus 12 individual phone contacts with peer coaches. Outcomes included weight loss, program adherence, and program satisfaction. RESULTS:Participants (mean age = 56 ± 10 years; BMI = 42.9 ± 11.0 kg/m(2)) were predominantly female (88%) and African American (85%). Treatment resulted in a significant mean weight loss of -4.5 ± 7.2 kg, and approximately 27% of participants lost ≥5% of their initial body weight. Participants completed approximately 50% of the group visits and 40% of the telephone calls with peer coaches. Participants rated both components of the intervention favorably. CONCLUSIONS: Results of this pilot study indicated that a primary care weight management program including group-based visits and peer-delivered telephone contacts achieved significant weight loss among predominantly African American patients with weight-related comorbidities, including diabetes and prediabetes. Additional research is needed to examine the long-term outcomes of this novel approach and to identify program components supporting patients' success.
Authors: Michael D Jensen; Donna H Ryan; Caroline M Apovian; Jamy D Ard; Anthony G Comuzzie; Karen A Donato; Frank B Hu; Van S Hubbard; John M Jakicic; Robert F Kushner; Catherine M Loria; Barbara E Millen; Cathy A Nonas; F Xavier Pi-Sunyer; June Stevens; Victor J Stevens; Thomas A Wadden; Bruce M Wolfe; Susan Z Yanovski; Harmon S Jordan; Karima A Kendall; Linda J Lux; Roycelynn Mentor-Marcel; Laura C Morgan; Michael G Trisolini; Janusz Wnek; Jeffrey L Anderson; Jonathan L Halperin; Nancy M Albert; Biykem Bozkurt; Ralph G Brindis; Lesley H Curtis; David DeMets; Judith S Hochman; Richard J Kovacs; E Magnus Ohman; Susan J Pressler; Frank W Sellke; Win-Kuang Shen; Sidney C Smith; Gordon F Tomaselli Journal: Circulation Date: 2013-11-12 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: S L Norris; F M Chowdhury; K Van Le; T Horsley; J N Brownstein; X Zhang; L Jack; D W Satterfield Journal: Diabet Med Date: 2006-05 Impact factor: 4.359
Authors: U Hølund; A Thomassen; G Boysen; P Charles; E F Eriksen; K Overvad; B Petersson; B Sandström; M Vittrup Journal: Am J Clin Nutr Date: 1997-06 Impact factor: 7.045
Authors: Thomas A Wadden; Delia Smith West; Linda Delahanty; John Jakicic; Jack Rejeski; Don Williamson; Robert I Berkowitz; David E Kelley; Christine Tomchee; James O Hill; Shiriki Kumanyika Journal: Obesity (Silver Spring) Date: 2006-05 Impact factor: 5.002
Authors: Aurélie Bocquier; Pierre Verger; Arnaud Basdevant; Gérard Andreotti; Jean Baretge; Patrick Villani; Alain Paraponaris Journal: Obes Res Date: 2005-04
Authors: Michael G Perri; Marian C Limacher; Patricia E Durning; David M Janicke; Lesley D Lutes; Linda B Bobroff; Martha Sue Dale; Michael J Daniels; Tiffany A Radcliff; A Daniel Martin Journal: Arch Intern Med Date: 2008-11-24
Authors: Alicia R Ruelaz; Pamela Diefenbach; Barbara Simon; Andy Lanto; David Arterburn; Paul G Shekelle Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2007-04 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Elizabeth B Lynch; Rebecca Liebman; Jennifer Ventrelle; Elizabeth F Avery; DeJuran Richardson Journal: Prev Chronic Dis Date: 2014-05-29 Impact factor: 2.830
Authors: Sandra Wittleder; Shea Smith; Binhuan Wang; Jeannette M Beasley; Stephanie L Orstad; Victoria Sweat; Allison Squires; Laura Wong; Yixin Fang; Paula Doebrich; Damara Gutnick; Craig Tenner; Scott E Sherman; Melanie Jay Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2021-02-26 Impact factor: 2.692
Authors: Elizabeth A Sturgiss; Nicholas Elmitt; Emily Haesler; Chris van Weel; Kirsty A Douglas Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2018-02-16 Impact factor: 2.692