Literature DB >> 25740450

Noninvasive Differential Diagnosis of Pulmonary Nodules Using the Standardized Uptake Value Index.

Satoshi Shiono1, Naoki Yanagawa, Masami Abiko, Toru Sato.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: We previously showed that the standardized uptake value (SUV) index, which was defined as the ratio of the maximum SUV of the tumor to mean SUV of the liver, was a surrogate marker of lung cancer aggressiveness. In this study of patients with pulmonary nodules (PNs), we explored whether the SUV index could be used to differentiate small malignant from small benign PNs.
METHODS: A total of 284 patients with solitary PNs ≤2 cm in size underwent positron emission tomography/computed tomography and surgery. The associations between pathological findings and clinical factors were evaluated.
RESULTS: The median SUV indices of lung cancer, metastatic PNs and benign nodules were 1.2, 1.5, and 0.6, respectively (P <0.01). A SUV index cut-off value of 1.2 was used to differentiate benign from malignant nodules. When patients were grouped according to SUV index cut-off values of <1.2 or ≥1.2, the following cases were false-negative: lung adenocarcinoma (P <0.01), kidney as primary site (P <0.01), and metastatic PNs with long disease-free survival (P = 0.02).
CONCLUSIONS: As a noninvasive diagnostic marker, the SUV index was found to be useful for differentiating benign from malignant small PNs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25740450      PMCID: PMC4989969          DOI: 10.5761/atcs.oa.14-00241

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg        ISSN: 1341-1098            Impact factor:   1.520


  20 in total

Review 1.  Receiver operating characteristic curve in diagnostic test assessment.

Authors:  Jayawant N Mandrekar
Journal:  J Thorac Oncol       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 15.609

2.  Index for rating diagnostic tests.

Authors:  W J YOUDEN
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1950-01       Impact factor: 6.860

3.  Positron emission tomography for predicting recurrence in stage I lung adenocarcinoma: standardized uptake value corrected by mean liver standardized uptake value.

Authors:  Satoshi Shiono; Masami Abiko; Toshimasa Okazaki; Masato Chiba; Hiroshi Yabuki; Toru Sato
Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2011-04-19       Impact factor: 4.191

4.  The IASLC Lung Cancer Staging Project: proposals for the revision of the TNM stage groupings in the forthcoming (seventh) edition of the TNM Classification of malignant tumours.

Authors:  Peter Goldstraw; John Crowley; Kari Chansky; Dorothy J Giroux; Patti A Groome; Ramon Rami-Porta; Pieter E Postmus; Valerie Rusch; Leslie Sobin
Journal:  J Thorac Oncol       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 15.609

5.  Preoperative F-18 fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography maximal standardized uptake value predicts survival after lung cancer resection.

Authors:  Robert J Downey; Timothy Akhurst; Mithat Gonen; Alain Vincent; Manjit S Bains; Steven Larson; Valerie Rusch
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2004-08-15       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 6.  Primary tumor standardized uptake value (SUVmax) measured on fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) is of prognostic value for survival in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): a systematic review and meta-analysis (MA) by the European Lung Cancer Working Party for the IASLC Lung Cancer Staging Project.

Authors:  Thierry Berghmans; Michèle Dusart; Marianne Paesmans; Claude Hossein-Foucher; Irene Buvat; Catherine Castaigne; Arnaud Scherpereel; Céline Mascaux; Michel Moreau; Martine Roelandts; Stéphane Alard; Anne-Pascale Meert; Edward F Patz; Jean-Jacques Lafitte; Jean-Paul Sculier
Journal:  J Thorac Oncol       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 15.609

7.  Preoperative staging of lung cancer with combined PET-CT.

Authors:  Barbara Fischer; Ulrik Lassen; Jann Mortensen; Søren Larsen; Annika Loft; Anne Bertelsen; Jesper Ravn; Paul Clementsen; Asbjørn Høgholm; Klaus Larsen; Torben Rasmussen; Susanne Keiding; Asger Dirksen; Oke Gerke; Birgit Skov; Ida Steffensen; Hanne Hansen; Peter Vilmann; Grete Jacobsen; Vibeke Backer; Niels Maltbaek; Jesper Pedersen; Henrik Madsen; Henrik Nielsen; Liselotte Højgaard
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2009-07-02       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  Ratio of positron emission tomography uptake to tumor size in surgically resected non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Brendon M Stiles; Abu Nasar; Farooq Mirza; Subroto Paul; Paul C Lee; Jeffrey L Port; Timothy E McGraw; Nasser K Altorki
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2012-09-20       Impact factor: 4.330

9.  Reproducibility of semi-quantitative parameters in FDG-PET using two different PET scanners: influence of attenuation correction method and examination interval.

Authors:  Tomohito Kamibayashi; Tatsuro Tsuchida; Yoshiki Demura; Tetsuya Tsujikawa; Hidehiko Okazawa; Takashi Kudoh; Hirohiko Kimura
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2008-04-12       Impact factor: 3.488

10.  A comparison of the diagnostic accuracy of 18F-FDG PET and CT in the characterization of solitary pulmonary nodules.

Authors:  James W Fletcher; Steven M Kymes; Michael Gould; Naomi Alazraki; R Edward Coleman; Val J Lowe; Charles Marn; George Segall; Lyn A Thet; Kelvin Lee
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2008-01-16       Impact factor: 10.057

View more
  1 in total

1.  Correlation analysis between the SUVmax of FDG-PET/CT and clinicopathological characteristics in oral squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Dong Zheng; Lixuan Niu; Wenpeng Liu; Changgang Zheng; Ruyi Yan; Liyan Gong; Zhongxing Dong; Ke Li; Jun Fei
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2019-03-05       Impact factor: 2.419

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.