Literature DB >> 25740332

Foraging in groups affects giving-up densities: solo foragers quit sooner.

Alexandra J R Carthey1, Peter B Banks.   

Abstract

The giving-up density framework is an elegant and widely adopted mathematical approach to measuring animals' foraging decisions at non-replenishing artificial resource patches. Under this framework, an animal should "give up" when the benefits of foraging are outweighed by the costs (e.g., predation risk, energetic, and/or missed opportunity costs). However, animals of many species may forage in groups, and group size is expected to alter perceived predation risk and hence influence quitting decisions. Yet, most giving-up density studies assume either that individuals forage alone or that giving-up densities are not affected by group foraging. For animals that forage both alone and in groups, differences in giving-up densities due to group foraging rather than experimental variables may substantially alter interpretation. However, no research to date has directly investigated how group foraging affects the giving-up density. We used remote-sensing cameras to identify instances of group foraging in two species of Rattus across three giving-up density experiments to determine whether group foraging influences giving-up densities. Both Rattus species have been observed to vary between foraging alone and in groups. In all three experiments, solo foragers left higher giving-up densities on average than did group foragers. This result has important implications for studies using giving-up densities to investigate perceived risk, the energetic costs of searching, handling time, digestion, and missed opportunity costs, particularly if groups of animals are more likely to experience certain experimental treatments. It is critically important that future giving-up density studies consider the effects of group foraging.

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25740332     DOI: 10.1007/s00442-015-3274-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oecologia        ISSN: 0029-8549            Impact factor:   3.225


  7 in total

1.  Everybody loses: intraspecific competition induces tragedy of the commons in Allenby's gerbils.

Authors:  Oded Berger-Tal; Keren Embar; Burt P Kotler; David Saltz
Journal:  Ecology       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 5.499

2.  Optimal foraging, the marginal value theorem.

Authors:  E L Charnov
Journal:  Theor Popul Biol       Date:  1976-04       Impact factor: 1.570

3.  Ferret odor as a processive stress model in rats: neurochemical, behavioral, and endocrine evidence.

Authors:  C V Masini; S Sauer; S Campeau
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 1.912

4.  Scale-dependent neighborhood effects: shared doom and associational refuge.

Authors:  Sara E Emerson; Joel S Brown; Christopher J Whelan; Kenneth A Schmidt
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2011-10-07       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  On the advantages of flocking.

Authors:  H R Pulliam
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  1973-02       Impact factor: 2.691

6.  Geometry for the selfish herd.

Authors:  W D Hamilton
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  1971-05       Impact factor: 2.691

7.  When does an alien become a native species? A vulnerable native mammal recognizes and responds to its long-term alien predator.

Authors:  Alexandra J R Carthey; Peter B Banks
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-02-15       Impact factor: 3.240

  7 in total
  5 in total

1.  How does the presence of a conspecific individual change the behavioral game that a predator plays with its prey?

Authors:  Reut Vardi; Zvika Abramsky; Burt P Kotler; Ofir Altstein; Michael L Rosenzweig
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2017-05-17       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Group foraging in Socotra cormorants: A biologging approach to the study of a complex behavior.

Authors:  Timothée R Cook; Rob Gubiani; Peter G Ryan; Sabir B Muzaffar
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2017-02-26       Impact factor: 2.912

3.  Size dependency of patch departure behavior: evidence from granivorous rodents.

Authors:  Francesco Cozzoli; Vojsava Gjoni; Alberto Basset
Journal:  Ecology       Date:  2019-07-24       Impact factor: 5.499

4.  Untangling the influence of biotic and abiotic factors on habitat selection by a tropical rodent.

Authors:  Georgia Ward-Fear; Gregory P Brown; David Pearson; Richard Shine
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-06-18       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Flexible resource use strategies of a central-place forager experiencing dynamic risk and opportunity.

Authors:  Kira L Hefty; Kelley M Stewart
Journal:  Mov Ecol       Date:  2019-08-02       Impact factor: 3.600

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.