Literature DB >> 25740093

Predicting difficult airways: 3-3-2 rule or 3-3 rule?

T Yu1, B Wang, X J Jin, R R Wu, H Wu, J J He, W D Yao, Y H Li.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The goal of this study was to assess the value of the 3-3 rule and the 3-3-1 rule in predicting difficult airways.
METHODS: The authors conducted an observational study over a 6-month period. For each consenting adult patient undergoing general anesthesia, preoperative patient characteristics and data regarding difficult airway assessments and airway outcomes were collected. The 3-3-2 rule, 3-3-1 rule and 3-3 rule were included in preoperative difficult airway assessments. The 3-3-1 rule is defined as an interincisor distance (IID) less than three fingers, a hyoid-mental distance (HMD) less than three fingers, and a hyoid-thyroid cartilage distance (HTD) less than one finger.
RESULTS: Among the 732 patients who were successfully recruited in this study, 67 patients had difficult laryngoscopy (DL) (9.2 %), and 25 patients had difficult intubation (DI) (3.4 % of the total). All of the DI patients were also DL patients (25/67, 37.3 %). The AUC of the 3-3-2, 3-3, and 3-3-1 rules for predicting difficult laryngoscopy were 0.702, 0.709, and 0.631, respectively. Significant differences between the 3-3-2 and 3-3-1 rules as well as between the 3-3 and 3-3-1 rules were evident. The AUC values for the 3-3-2, 3-3, and 3-3-1 rules for predicting DI were 0.830, 0.822, and 0.725, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: The 3-3 rule and the 3-3-2 rule are similar regarding their ability to predict difficult airways. A HTD less than two fingers or one finger is not predictive of DV or DI.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25740093     DOI: 10.1007/s11845-015-1276-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ir J Med Sci        ISSN: 0021-1265            Impact factor:   1.568


  20 in total

Review 1.  Airway challenges in critical care.

Authors:  J P Nolan; F E Kelly
Journal:  Anaesthesia       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 6.955

2.  Predicting difficult intubation in apparently normal patients: a meta-analysis of bedside screening test performance.

Authors:  Toshiya Shiga; Zen'ichiro Wajima; Tetsuo Inoue; Atsuhiro Sakamoto
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 7.892

3.  Diagnostic predictor of difficult laryngoscopy: the hyomental distance ratio.

Authors:  Jin Huh; Hwa-Yong Shin; Seong-Hyop Kim; Tae-Kyoon Yoon; Duk-Kyung Kim
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 5.108

4.  The diagnostic value of the upper lip bite test combined with sternomental distance, thyromental distance, and interincisor distance for prediction of easy laryngoscopy and intubation: a prospective study.

Authors:  Zahid Hussain Khan; Mostafa Mohammadi; Mohammad R Rasouli; Fahimeh Farrokhnia; Razmeh Hussain Khan
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 5.108

5.  [Comparison of different tests to determine difficult intubation in pediatric patients].

Authors:  Mehmet Turan Inal; Dilek Memiş; Sevtap Hekimoglu Sahin; Isıl Gunday
Journal:  Rev Bras Anestesiol       Date:  2014-08-28       Impact factor: 0.964

Review 6.  Complications and failure of airway management.

Authors:  T M Cook; S R MacDougall-Davis
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 9.166

7.  Difficult tracheal intubation in obstetrics.

Authors:  R S Cormack; J Lehane
Journal:  Anaesthesia       Date:  1984-11       Impact factor: 6.955

8.  A clinical sign to predict difficult tracheal intubation: a prospective study.

Authors:  S R Mallampati; S P Gatt; L D Gugino; S P Desai; B Waraksa; D Freiberger; P L Liu
Journal:  Can Anaesth Soc J       Date:  1985-07

9.  A comparison of the upper lip bite test (a simple new technique) with modified Mallampati classification in predicting difficulty in endotracheal intubation: a prospective blinded study.

Authors:  Zahid Hussain Khan; Arash Kashfi; Elham Ebrahimkhani
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 5.108

10.  Sensitivity of palm print, modified mallampati score and 3-3-2 rule in prediction of difficult intubation.

Authors:  Ata Mahmoodpoor; Hassan Soleimanpour; Kavous Shahsavari Nia; Jafar Rahimi Panahi; Mohammadreza Afhami; Samad Ej Golzari; Karim Majani
Journal:  Int J Prev Med       Date:  2013-09
View more
  5 in total

1.  A Prospective Study to Correlate Difficult Intubation with Difficult Laryngeal Exposure for Microlaryngeal Surgery using Various Grading Scales of Difficult Intubation.

Authors:  Nupur Kapoor Nerurkar; Anupriya Hajela; Asitama Sarkar; Pradnya Kulkarni
Journal:  Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2022-05-16

2.  Nomograms for predicting difficult airway based on ultrasound assessment.

Authors:  Bin Wang; Weidong Yao; Qi Xue; Mingfang Wang; Jianling Xu; Yongquan Chen; Ye Zhang
Journal:  BMC Anesthesiol       Date:  2022-01-13       Impact factor: 2.217

Review 3.  Airway physical examination tests for detection of difficult airway management in apparently normal adult patients.

Authors:  Dominik Roth; Nathan L Pace; Anna Lee; Karen Hovhannisyan; Alexandra-Maria Warenits; Jasmin Arrich; Harald Herkner
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2018-05-15

4.  The Relationship between Orotracheal Intubation Difficulty Scoring Systems and Anthropometric Factors.

Authors:  Maryam Motamedi; Maleheh Soltani; Marzieh Amiri; Elham Memary
Journal:  Adv J Emerg Med       Date:  2018-11-29

5.  A clinical prediction rule to identify difficult intubation in children with Robin sequence requiring mandibular distraction osteogenesis based on craniofacial CT measures.

Authors:  Zhe Mao; Na Zhang; Yingqiu Cui
Journal:  BMC Anesthesiol       Date:  2019-11-21       Impact factor: 2.217

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.